similar to: SVD on very large data matrix

This is kind of like asking for a solution to x+1=x+1. Go back to linear algebra and look up Singular Value Decomposition, and decide if you really want to proceed. See also ?svd and package irlba. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On April 20, 2016 4:22:34 AM PDT, A A via R-help <r-help at r-project.org> wrote: > > > >I have a situation in R where I would like

--=====================_24736660==_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable SVD-Error on R 1.1.0 Windows 98 I get the following error applying svd on a positive definite matrix : > sk2 [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [1,] 1.0460139783 0.084356992 -2.810553e-04

Hello! I suppose this is more a matrix theory question than a question on R, but I will give it a try... I am using La.svd to compute the singular value decomposition (SVD) of a variance matrix, i.e., a symmetric nonnegative definite square matrix. Let S be my variance matrix, and S = U D V' be its SVD. In my numerical experiments I always got U = V. Is this necessarily the case? Or I might

Hi: I create a hermitian matrix and then perform its singular value decomposition. But when I put it back, I don't get the original hermitian matrix. I am having the same problem with spectral value decomposition as well. I am using R 1.7.0 on Windows. Here is my code: X <- matrix(rnorm(16)+1i*rnorm(16),4) X <- X + t(X) X[upper.tri(X)] <- Conj(X[upper.tri(X)]) Y <-

Lately I'm getting this error quite a bit: Error in La.svd(x, nu, nv) : error code 1 from Lapack routine 'dgesdd' I'm running R 2.5.0 on a 64 bit Intel machine running Fedora (8 I think). Maybe the 64 bit platform is more fragile about declaring convergence. I'm seeing way more of these errors than I ever have before. From R-Help I see that this issue comes up from time to

I am trying to perform Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) on a Term Document Matrix I created using the 'tm' package. Eventually I want to do a Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA). There are 5677 documents with 771 terms (the DTM is 771 x 5677). When I try to do the SVD, it runs out of memory. I am using a 12GB Dual core Machine with Windows XP and don't think I can increase the memory

Dear R-helpers, could anybody explain me briefly what is the difference between eigenvectors returned by 'eigen' and 'svd' functions and how they are related? Thanks in advance Ondrej Mikula

Hello List, i need help for eigen and svd functions. I have a non-symmetric square matrix. These matrix is not positive (some eigenvalues are negative). I want to diagonalise these matrix. So, I use svd and eigen and i compare the results. eigen give me the "good" eigenvalues (positive and negative). I compare with another software and the results are the same. BUT, when i use svd,

Dear R-users, I computed determinant of a square matrix "var.r" using the SVD output: detr _ 1 d _ svd(var.r)$d for (i in 1:length(d)) { detr _ detr*d[i] } print(detr) 30.20886 BUT when I tried : det(var.r) I got : -30.20886 Is this because SVD output will only give absolute of the eigenvalues ?, If this is the case how can I get the original eigenvalues? Thanks, Agus

Dear R-users, I have one question about using SVD to get an inverse matrix of covariance matrix Sometimes I met many singular values d are close to 0: look this example $d [1] 4.178853e+00 2.722005e+00 2.139863e+00 1.867628e+00 1.588967e+00 [6] 1.401554e+00 1.256964e+00 1.185750e+00 1.060692e+00 9.932592e-01 [11] 9.412768e-01 8.530497e-01 8.211395e-01 8.077817e-01 7.706618e-01 [16]

On two laptops running 32-bit kubuntu, I have found that svd(), invoked within R 2.9.1 as supplied with the current ubuntu package, returns very incorrect results when presented with complex-valued input. One of the laptops is a Dell D620, the other a MacBook Pro. I've also verified the problem on a 32-bit desktop. On these same systems, R compiled from source provides apparently

Hi All, I performed an svd on a matrix X and saved the first three column of the left singular matrix U. ( I assume that they correspond to the projection of the matrix on the first three eigen vectors that corresponds to the first three largest eigenvalues). I would like to know how much variance is explained by the first eigenvectors? how can I find that. Thanks for your help -- View this

Hello,=0D =0D I just noticed that the "svd" function does not work properly for some=0D sparse matrices.=0D When I replace the 0 by very small noises (let's say 10^-16), it then=0D works.=0D The test I've performed is to compared the singular values to the eigen=0D values (as I work with squarred matrices).=0D =0D Here is the code (I may be wrong!):=0D =0D

I have a situation in R where I would like to find any x (if one exists) that solves the linear system of equations Ax = b, where A is square, sparse, and singular, and b is a vector. Here is some code that mimics my issue with a relatively simple A and b, along with three other methods of solving this system that I found online, two of which give me an error and one of which succeeds on the

Hi folks, I know, this is a fairly common question and I am really disappointed that I could not find a solution. I am trying to calculate Mahanalobis distances in a data frame, where I have several hundreds groups and several hundreds of variables. Whatever I do, however I subset it I get the "system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number" error. I know what it means

At 01:37 PM 5/10/00 +0200, ralle wrote: >Hi, >I have a problem understanding what is going on with eigen() for >nonsymmetric matrices. >Example: >h<-rnorm(6) >> dim(h)<-c(2,3) >> c<-rnorm(6) "c" is not a great choice of identifier! >> dim(c)<-c(3,2) >> Pi<-h %*% c >> eigen(Pi)$values >[1] 1.56216542 0.07147773 These could

Error in La.svd(x, nu, nv) : error code 1 from Lapack routine ‘dgesdd’ what resources are there to track down errors like this [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hey, All In principal component analysis (PCA), we want to know how many percentage the first principal component explain the total variances among the data. Assume the data matrix X is zero-meaned, and I used the following procedures: C = covriance(X) %% calculate the covariance matrix; [EVector,EValues]=eig(C) %% L = diag(EValues) %%L is a column vector with eigenvalues as the elements percent

Dear R list users, the singluar value decomposition of a symmetric matrix M is UDV^(T), where U = V. La.svd(M) gives as output three elements: the diagonal of D and the two orthogonal matrices u and vt (which is already the transpose of v). I noticed that the transpose of vt is not exactly u. Why is that? thank you for your attention and your help Stefano AVVISO IMPORTANTE: Questo messaggio di

Hello, I have a question that is not directly related to R ... but I try to do it in R ;-) : I would like to generate a matrix Q satisfying (for a given Z, X and W) the two following conditions: t(Q)%*%Q=Z (1) XQ=W (2) where: Q is m rows and r columns X is p rows and m columns D is p rows and r columns C is r rows and r columns with m>p,r e.g: m=6, p=2 r=3