similar to: Composite Quantile Regression

HOgg 0.4.1 Released ------------------- The HOgg package provides a commandline tool for manipulating Ogg files, and a corresponding Haskell library. HOgg is in hackage, or on the web at: http://www.kfish.org/~conrad/software/hogg/ This is the fourth public release. The focus is on correctness of Ogg parsing, production and editing. The capabilities of the hogg commandline tool are roughly on

Can I fix the checksum with a hex editor? Sent from my iPhone On Jun 25, 2009, at 3:23 PM, Monty Montgomery <monty at xiph.org> wrote: > Confirmed--- the checksum on the second page (the comment page where > the album art was added) is incorrect. Vorbis players are not allowed > to decode any stream in which one of the setup headers is corrupt, and > a bad checksum counts as

Hi I am trying to convert SAS codes to R, but some of the result are quite different from SAS. When I ran proc mixed, I have an option ddfm=bw followed by the model. How can I show this method in R?(I am thinking that this maybe the reason that I can't get the similar results) below is my SAS codes: proc mixed data=test covtest empirical; class pair grade team school; model score = trt

Hi again, thank you for your previous answers. Just another question, though ... I get the following variance components after fitting a mixed model. Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Corr PlantID TreatmCtrl 0.51784 0.71961 TreatmNoAccess 4.77469 2.18511 -0.063 TreatmNoKeel 4.22726 2.05603 0.513 0.751 TreatmNoSpur 0.45918

Hi All, I am trying to shift from running mixed models in SAS using PROC MIXED to using lme4 package in R. In trying to match the coefficients of R output to that of SAS output, I came across this problem. The dataset I am using is this one: http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_mixed_sect034.htm If I run the following code: proc mixed data=rc

Hi Is there a tool to verify and fix the checksum in a Speex file. I have seen somewhere a tool like "hoog.." Were can I get it Thanks for your time Saju -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20100120/79e209ad/attachment.htm

I have over 1,000 ogg vorbis files that are no longer playable or editable. I believe the main cause was a MediaMonkey plugin that automatically fetched album art and added it to the header. The plugin itself just uses the generic MediaMonkey metadata facility, but something happened -- perhaps when the album art bitmap image was too large -- that caused the files to no longer work.

On 02/10/2007, Ian Malone <ibmalone@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin Leese wrote: > > 2. Following on from 1, a tool which inputs an > > Ogg containier with one or more streams, and > > outputs a new Ogg container with the same > > streams plus an Ogg Skeleton stream stuffed > > in front would be very helpful. The tool could > > also

On 02/10/2007, Ian Malone <ibmalone@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin Leese wrote: > > 2. Following on from 1, a tool which inputs an > > Ogg containier with one or more streams, and > > outputs a new Ogg container with the same > > streams plus an Ogg Skeleton stream stuffed > > in front would be very helpful. The tool could > > also

Is there an updated version of the fileutils df that will show mounted ext3 partitions? I'm using fileutils-4.1. -- Curtis Hogg [buckminst@inconnu.isu.edu] ---------------------------------------------- T-shirt Of The Day: I'm the person your mother warned you about. ---------------------------------------------- Email 1 - buckminst@inconnu.isu.edu Email 2 - buckminst@hotmail.com WWW -

Dear list, The name of R-language is too short and is not friendly to search engines. Do you think it can be renamed to something like "Rsio" or "Radio" ? Thank you so much for this useful software! Best wishes. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Conrad Parker wrote: > Here's some instructions for installing hogg on a current Ubuntu 8.10 > (or Debian unstable? testing?) system, ie. if you don't already have > haskell's cabal system installed: > > $ sudo apt-get install ghc6 > $ wget http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cabal-install/0.6.0/cabal-install-0.6.0.tar.gz > $ tar zxf

Conrad Parker wrote, on 6/20/2009 10:24 PM: >> How about another approach -- is there a tool that will verify the page >> checksums? oggz-validate doesn't seem to do this. If the page checksums >> are okay, then doesn't that suggest the streams are also recoverable? > If the page checksums are bad then the page will get rejected by > libogg, and oggz-validate

Dear R-gurus, I am pretty much new on R. I am trying to to do a repeated analysis of a linear mixed model with R, and I consistently fail... The problem is: Cow is the random factor, treatment is the fixed factor. The dependent variable is milk yield, which is measured several times (repeatedly over time), thus there is another variable which is time (i.e. week). The model would be

After some attempt to implement reduce-add in LLVM, I found out a easier way to detect reduce-add without introducing new IR operations. The basic idea is annotating phi node instead of add (so that it is easier to handle other reduction operations). In PHINode class, we can add a flag indicating if the phi node is a reduction one (the flag can be set in loop vectorizer for vectorized phi nodes).

Adam Rosi-Kessel wrote, on 6/19/2009 3:56 PM: > Conrad Parker wrote, on 6/18/2009 3:15 PM: >> Hopefully at some point the vorbis data in the file becomes valid. >> Perhaps we just need to know the original encoding settings to create >> a new file with valid codebooks and splice them together: oggz-dump -r >> should be ok for that, just take the first 3 packets of the

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Cong, > > After reading the original RFC and this update, I'm still not entirely sure I understand the semantics of the flag you're proposing to add. Does it having something to do with the ordering of the reduction operations? The flag is only useful for vectorized reduction for now. I'll give

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Xinliang David Li" <davidxl at google.com> > To: "Cong Hou" <congh at google.com> > Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 5:17:58 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Introducing a vector reduction add

Hello, I have got a linear model that looks like this: lm(criterion ~ variable.A*variable.a + variable.B*variable.b + variable.C *variable.c) The output computed with stdCoeff() seems to be all right, but it does not show the coefficients of the interaction of the first pair of variables. Instead, it shows "NA": (Intercept) NA

Hi All, I'm working with some SAS code to analyze an experiment set up as follows: 66 subjects (colonies) treated with a random treatment (1-8) and measured at three time points. The data structure looks like: input colony tmt y1 y2 y3; y=y1; date=*1*; output; y=y2; date=*2*; output; y=y3; date=*3*; output; datalines; 1