similar to: Deviance in Zero inflated models

Dear all, I am using gamlss (Package gamlss version 4.0-0, R version 2.10.1, Windows XP Service Pack 3 on a HP EliteBook) to relate bird counts to habit variables. However, most models fail because “the global deviance is increasing” and I am not sure what causes this behaviour. The dataset consists of counts of birds (duck) and 5 habit variables measured in the field (n= 182). The dependent

Dear list, I'm wondering if anyone can help me calculate the deviance of either a zeroinfl or hurdle model from package pscl? Even if someone could point me to the correct formula for calculating the deviance, I could do the rest on my own. I am trying to calculate a pseudo-R-squared measure based on the R^{2}_{DEV} of [1], so I need to be able to calculate the deviance of the full and null

Dear R users, I want to apply zero inflated models with continuous and categorical variables and I used pscl package from R and the zeroinf() function. My question are the follow: a) The value of fitted.values is mu or (1-p)*mu? where p is the probability of zero came form a zero point mass b) If mu is zero, how do i know if it is a zero from the zero point mass or from the count process?

Dear R crew: I think I am in the right mailing list. I have a very simple dataset consisting of two variables: cestode intensity and chick size (defined as CAPI). Intensity is clearly overdispersed, with way too many zeroes. I'm interested in looking at the association between these two variables, i.e. how well does chick size predict tape intensity? I fit a zero inflated negat. binomial

Running a binary logit model on the data df <- data.frame(y=sample(letters[1:3], 100, repl=T), x=rnorm(100)) reveals some residual deviance: summary(glm(y ~ ., data=df, family=binomial("logit"))) However, running a multinomial model on that data (multinom, nnet) reveals a residual deviance: summary(multinom(y ~ ., data=df)) On page 203, the MASS book says that "here the

Dear all, I'm using zeroinfl() from the pscl-package for zero inflated Poisson regression. I would like to calculate (aproximate) prediction intervals for the fitted values. The package itself does not provide them. Can this be calculated analyticaly? Or do I have to use bootstrap? What I tried until now is to use bootstrap to estimate these intervals. Any comments on the code are welcome.

Hi, I want using zero-inflated negative binomial regression model to classify data(a vector of data), that is I want know each observed value is more likely belong to the "zero" or "count" distribution(better with relative probability). My data is some like: count site samp 12909 1 1 602 1 2 50 1 3 1218 1 4 91291 1 5

Hello, I have count data that illustrate the presence or absence of individuals in my study population. I created a grid cell across the study area and calcuated a count value for each individual per season per year for each grid cell. The count value is the number of time an individual was present in each grid cell. For illustration my data columns look something like this and are repeated for

Hello, I am having a problem with the zero-inflated negative binomial (package pscl). I have 6 sites with plant populations, and I am trying to model the number of seeds produced as a function of their size and their site. There are a lot of zero's because many of my plants get eaten before flowering, thereby producing 0 seeds, and that varies by site. Because of that and because the

Dear list, I'm currently trying to develop a model to assess clam yield potential in a lagoon. I'm using the zeroinfl function of the pscl package to fit a Zero-inflated negative binomial model, given the high occurrence of zero counts. I don't understand from the sentence in the pscl guide "Zero-inflated count models are a type of two-component mixture model, with a component

Are you referring to the zeroinfl() function in the countreg package? If so, I think predict(fm_zinb2, type = "zero", newdata = some.new.data) will give you pi for each combination of covariate values that you provide in some.new.data where pi is the probability to observe a zero from the point mass component. As to your second question, I'm not sure that's possible, for any

Dear R crew: I am sorry this question has been posted before, but I can't seem to solve this problem yet. I have a simple dataset consisting of two variables: cestode intensity and chick size (defined as CAPI). Intensity is a count and clearly overdispersed, with way too many zeroes. I'm interested in looking at the association between these two variables, i.e. how well does chick

Dear All, I am trying to fit some data both as a negative binomial and a zero inflated binomial. For the first case, I have no particular problems, see the small snippet below library(MASS) #a basic R library set.seed(123) #to have reproducible results x4 <- rnegbin(500, mu = 5, theta = 4) #Now fit and check that we get the right parameters fd <- fitdistr(x4, "Negative

Hello I am interested in Poisson or (ideally) Negative Binomial regression with an inflated number of 1 responses I have seen JK Lindsey's fmr function in the gnlm library, which fits zero inflated Poisson (ZIP) or zero inflated negative binomial regression, but the help file states that for ' Poisson or related distributions the mixture involves the zero category'. I had thought

Hi, I am new to R and has been depending mostly on the online tutotials to learn R. I have to deal with zero inflated negative binomial distribution. I am however unable to understand the following example from this link http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/dae/zinbreg.htm The result gives two blocks. *library(pscl) zinb<-zeroinfl(count ~ child + camper | persons, dist = "negbin", EM =

Hi! I'm running a zero-inflated negative binomial regression on a large (n=54822) set of confidential data. I'm using the code: ZerNegBinRegress<-zeroinfl(Paper~.|., data=OvsP, dist="negbin", EM=TRUE) And keep getting the error: Warning message: glm.fit: fitted probabilities numerically 0 or 1 occurred I've done enough reading about this error to realize that I have

Hi all, I am running the following model: > glm89.nb <- glm.nb(AvGUD ~ Year*Trt*Micro) where Year has 3 levels, Trt has 2 levels and Micro has 3 levels. However when I run it has a zero inflated negative binomial (as I have lots of zeros) I get the below error message: > Zinb <- zeroinfl(AvGUD ~ Year*Trt*Micro |1, data = AvGUD89, dist = "negbin") Error in optim(fn =

Hi all, I have count data (number of flowering individuals plus total number of individuals) across 24 sites and 3 treatments (time since last burn). Following recommendations in the R Book, I used a glm with the model y~ burn, with y being two columns (flowering, not flowering) and burn the time (category) since burn. However, the residual deviance is roughly 10 times the number of degrees of

Hi all- I fit a zero-inflated Poisson model to model bycatch rates using an offset term for effort. I need to apply the fitted model to a datasets of varying levels of effort to predict the associated levels of bycatch. I am seeking assistance as to the correct way to code this. Thanks in advance! Laura [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Sorry bit of a Newbie question, and I promise I have searched the forum already, but I'm getting a bit desperate! I have over-dispersed, zero inflated data, with variance greater than the mean, suggesting Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial - which I attempted in R with the pscl package suggested on http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/R/dae/zinbreg.htm However my data is non-integer with some pesky