similar to: [Bug 9812] New: Lookahead file-list loading and comparison

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814 Summary: --cache parameter for storing recent file data Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10379 Summary: rsync metadata files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com QAContact:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10380 Summary: Non-Nested Folder Optimisation Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14081 Bug ID: 14081 Summary: --copy-command option for specifying custom file copying behaviour Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9864 Summary: Allow permanent compression of destination files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10507 Summary: Structured Output (for Simpler Parsing) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

On 02 Feb 2016, at 13:09, Haravikk <dovecot at haravikk.me> wrote: > > So I still haven?t found a way to require client certificates only for port 993/IMAPS while leaving unencrypted IMAP open for local, trusted, services. > > Is there really no way to do this? I just found out how to do the same thing for postfix (turns out it?s fairly easy, just a matter of adding the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10579 Summary: --xattr internal abbrev error Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at haravikk.com

> On 27 Jan 2016, at 21:55, Axel Luttgens <axel.luttgens at skynet.be> wrote: > > Hello Haravikk, > > Perhaps could you try to devise an exception based on one (or more) "remote" section(s), as in: > > remote ip.of.webmail.server { > ssl_verify_client_cert = no > [other settings, if needed] > } > > But I guess you would need to combine

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14371 Bug ID: 14371 Summary: Combined Exclude & Protect Filter Type Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12570 Bug ID: 12570 Summary: Problems with --checksum --existing Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: atom at

I?m using dovecot to provide encrypted IMAP e-mail support for remote clients and it?s working great. However, I also need to set up a webmail front-end (Roundcube), which I?m hoping to have use unencrypted IMAP on port 143 (as only port 993 is available externally). The problem I?m running into is that I want to require client certificate authentication on port 993, but dovecot is apparently

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10601 Summary: Retry Delay for Vanished Files/Directories Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at haravikk.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10575 Summary: Long Delay for Large Folders Even with Incremental File-List Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10051 Summary: Improved long file-name handling Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com QAContact:

Hi, how does rsync work if it compares two very huge files on two distinct hosts (rsync uses a networked connection, via SSH)? Some observation seems to indicate, that rsync first reads (and checksums?) the remote (destination) side, then, if finished, it reads (and checksums?) the local (source) side and then starts transferring the delta if done with the comparison of these two files on both

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10621 Summary: Allow Filter Rule Imports Relative to Importer Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at

Your observation would be right if you are using --checksum which you shouldn't be. Otherwise, unless you are using --whole-file rsync will use its differential algorithm to compare the files. If you are using --progress you will see it step through the file at a faster speed than the network is capable of. If there is no difference then rsync will go very fast to 100% then do any metadata

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5482 Summary: apply the rsync comparison algorithm specially to .mov and .mp4 files Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Okay, I'd like to start first by saying, awesome work on this project! It's been a few years since I last tracked the progress of WINE on OS X, and it's come on leaps and bounds as I can run most everything I've thrown at it so far, with only minor issues here and there, which is a damned sight better than VMWare Fusion or Parallels which have compatibility issues everywhere,