similar to: script to detect dictionary attacks

I wonder if there is an easy way to provide dovecot a flat text file of ipv4 #'s which should be ignored or dropped? I have accumulated 45,000+ IPs which routinely try dictionary and 12345678 password attempts. The file is too big to create firewall drops, and I don't want to compile with wrappers *if* dovecot has an easy ability to do this. If dovecot could parse a flat text file of

Hi Guys, I was really hoping a couple of years later this would be addressed... I'm running Dovecot 2.2.5 on FreeBSD. Is there anyway to limit the number of auth attempts allowed in a single session? The reason for this is because I have "fail2ban" setup to firewall out any IP addresses that repeatedly auth fails. The issue occurs when the connection is already in an

On 03/01/2015 04:25 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> I wonder if there is an easy way to provide dovecot a flat text >> file of ipv4 #'s which should be ignored or dropped? >> >> I have accumulated 45,000+ IPs which routinely try dictionary >> and 12345678 password attempts. The file is too big to create >> firewall drops, and I don't want to compile with

I'm seeing strings of failed POP3 login attempts with obvious bogus usernames coming from different IP addresses. Today's originated from 216.31.146.19 (which resolves to neovisionlabs.com). This looks like a botnet attack. I got a similar probe a couple days ago. Is anyone else seeing these? The attack involves trying about 20 different names, about 3-4 seconds apart. Here's a

Hi, I been using dovecot for awhile and its been solid, however I been having some issues with dictionary attacks. I installed fail2ban and for the most part is working fine. However today I got another spammer relaying through my server. Looking at the logs I see the following dictonary attack from 94.242.206.37 Nov 10 03:04:38 pop dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected: rip=94.242.206.37,

after having my own dnsbl feeded by a honeypot and even mod_security supports it for webservers i think dovecot sould support the same to prevent dictionary attacks from known bad hosts, in our case that blacklist is 100% trustable and blocks before SMTP-Auth while normal RBL's are after SASL i admit that i am not a C/C++-programmer, but i think doing the DNS request and in case it has a

Am 02.03.2015 um 18:56 schrieb Robert Schetterer: > perhaps and i mean really "perhaps" go this way > > https://sys4.de/de/blog/2014/03/27/fighting-smtp-auth-brute-force-attacks/ > > https://sys4.de/de/blog/2012/12/28/botnets-mit-rsyslog-und-iptables-recent-modul-abwehren/ > > 45K+ IPs will work in a recent table > i have them too but for smtp only like > >

Am 17.05.2016 um 09:47 schrieb Fabian Cenedese: > >> Am 16.05.2016 um 07:32 schrieb ToddAndMargo: >>> May I surmise that all the encrypted file now have >>> an extra extension of ".crypt"? So it is easy to >>> see who got clobbered. >> >> how do you come to that conclusion and even if some malware acts that way what makes you sure you can

On 03/03/2015 11:03 PM, Earl Killian wrote: > On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> that is all nice >> >> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: >> >> * centralized >> * no log parsing at all >> * honeypot data are "delivered" to any host >> * it's cheap >> * it's easy to maintain >> * it

hi all I've been reading this thread with interest. As a rather novice programmer. I'm not being humble here, I really am not very good, I can do stuff, but it takes a LONG time. My spaghetti code even has meatballs in it ! Not being a great programmer I'm not really able to code something up, but it occurred to me something could be scripted, are the other posters suggesting

Who was the genius that decided that system-config-network-tui should NOT be part of the base CentOS 6.3 install ?? Not to mention it has insane deps like wifi firmware packages... not really if all you want to do is configure eth0 from the command line... FC

I recall others on this list are using fail2ban to block brute force login attempts. Packages are from the EPEL repo, so I'm just sharing some knowledge here. For about two months now I've had a CentOS 6.3 box (web host) in production that occasionally is ftp brute forced. Oddly enough fail2ban wasn't nabbing the perpetrators. I found that the iptables chain for VSFTP isn't

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm migrating from one system to another. Both are Arch Linux, but copying the configurations and just modifying them for IP addresses and hostnames didn't work. Here's doveconf -n # 2.1.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf doveconf: Warning: service auth { client_limit=256 } is lower than required under max. load (3072) doveconf:

Hello, I have a few users that are often hit by a trojan virus that steals e-mail user and password. Having a very little (if not null) power on their machines, I need to be able to block the outgoing mail wich is handled by postfix via dovecot SASL. Blocking it at dovecot level would be optimal, for the virus doesn't necessarily use the e-mail of the user as its from, just the user and

Does dovecot have any dictionary attack defenses yet? In the past I have had to implement defense from outside dovecot, but since dovecot is at the front lines and therefore is the first to know I'm hoping by now there is something we can set. For example, a limit on access failures per minut/hour/day or some such. If not why not?

Hi, Since upgrading our mail servers to Postfix/Dovecot, we've seen a rather large increase in botnet brute force password attacks. I guess our old servers were too slow to suit their needs. Now, when they hit upon a valid user, it's easy to see what passwords they are trying (we've enabled auth_debug_passwords and set auth_verbose_passwords = plain). We can easily have log

Hi, I want to replace text smilies with images in one of my Rails applications. Anyone knows a plugin / .. for this matter? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Smilies---Emoticons-..-tf2126674.html#a5867836 Sent from the RubyOnRails Users forum at Nabble.com.

On 17/11/2014 07:23, Ron Leach wrote: > On 16/11/2014 07:24, Robert Schetterer wrote (re-ordered): >> Am 16.11.2014 um 02:24 schrieb Reindl Harald: >> >>> * if you find a security issue in postfix running >>> on 587 over TLS cry out loud > > I'm thinking beyond that; I want to get to the position that when > there is an issue in the MTA, our

Hi hoping someone can help me a little with this one. I have 2 mail servers, the incoming mail server runs dovecot and the outgoing mail server runs postfix with sasl. Lately I noticed a lot of spammers are running dictionary attacks on my incoming server and then using that user/password for sasl on the outgoing server. The weird thing is I never see on the logs the guessed

Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald: > Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia: >> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >>> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>>>