similar to: Crash while moving mail between private folder and shared folder

On 28/05/2018 13:23, kfx wrote: > On 28/05/2018 13:04, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 28 May 2018, at 13.28, kfx <kadafax at gmail.com >> <mailto:kadafax at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Especially what is in the "fts" header vs. "next uid" header? Does >>>> the UID in "fts" header keep changing

On 28/05/2018 13:04, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 28 May 2018, at 13.28, kfx <kadafax at gmail.com > <mailto:kadafax at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >>> Especially what is in the "fts" header vs. "next uid" header? Does >>> the UID in "fts" header keep changing every time you save a new mail? >>> I suppose it will.

On 28 May 2018, at 13.28, kfx <kadafax at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Especially what is in the "fts" header vs. "next uid" header? Does the UID in "fts" header keep changing every time you save a new mail? I suppose it will. > > Diff between 2 emails: > next uid = 30104 | next uid = 30105 > last_indexed_uid = 30103 |

Le 21/05/2018 ? 12:38, Aki Tuomi a ?crit?: > can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? Same (wrong) result: 1. Send an email with "too6Ouka" in the body 2. Search against "too6Ouka": # doveadm search -u username mailbox INBOX body too6Ouka --> No result 3. Force re-index: # doveadm fts rescan -u username 4. Search again against

Hi list, I''m totally new at xen and apologize for my ignorance. What I''m trying to do is the following: I''ve got a laptop with core 2 duo cpu. Dom0: Fedora Core 6. Dom1: WinXP HVM I want to give the Dom1 full access to the wifi card, and the possibility to use USB pen drive. So I''ve hidden the pci address (according to lspci output) in the kernel''s

Hi, I'm using RHEL4 and since the dovecot RPM is present in the main repository, I'm thinking about switching from courier-imap (with whom I've got trouble to update) to Dovecot. Here are two questions about Dovecot (google didn't answer me): 1. Is it possible for dovecot to use the bind mecanism against ldap for authentification purpose. My main concern is to avoid the

Hello, I'm trying this here first before moving to the apache list. Maybe someone of you use mod_authnz_ldap with multiple ldap servers declaration for redundancy. With one server declared it is working. Here is what I've tried for adding another one (space separated as read in the apache's doc) : .... AuthLDAPURL

Hi list, I have a SAN attached to a CentOS 4.2 server. I have expanded the size of the virtual disk within the SAN (by adding a new HD to the disk pool) and need CentOS to see the new size (CentOS see it as /dev/sdb). I'm using LVM. Do you know a method for the Volume Group to see that one of its harddisk is now bigger, without rebooting (it's not a problem with a reboot but since

Hi list, Since the upgrade to 5.2, when I log into my server with a ldap account I have these 2 errors messages: -bash: [: =: unary operator expected -bash: [: -le: unary operator expected After investigation, the trouble come from two scripts in /etc/profile.d: /etc/profile.d/krb5-workstation.sh /etc/profile.d/vim.sh The problem is with the test where the command "id" is involved,

Hi list, This post is slightly OT, I hope no one will take offense. I was following the wiki on using dovecot LDA with postfix and implemented, for our future mail server, the address extensions mechanism: an email sent to "validUser+foldername at mydomain.com" will have dovecot-lda automagically create and subscribe the "foldername" folder. With some basic scripting I was

Hi list, here is what happened: today I noticed some resolution's problems on my network. I did a "service named status" and here was the output: # /etc/init.d/named status rndc: connection to remote host closed This may indicate that the remote server is using an older version of the command protocol, this host is not authorized to connect, or the key is invalid. In the

Hi list, I'm a bit worried here. On a server, Centos 4.3 fully-patched SELinux activated, Osiris (a decentralized scanner for files changes on distant servers) signaled me several changes on files who were not (at first sight) affected by a recent update (the list is below). Is there a logic explanation for those changes to happen ? The "rpm -Va" command does not output md5sum

can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? Aki On 21.05.2018 13:31, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > Le 21/05/2018 ? 11:46, Aki Tuomi a ?crit?: >> That message is coming from the temporary raw user, not from the actual >> user. >> >> How did you verify that the FTS indexes are not created or updated >> automatically? > I send an

On 21 May 2018, at 14.11, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > > Le 21/05/2018 ? 12:38, Aki Tuomi a ?crit : >> can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? > > Same (wrong) result: > 1. Send an email with "too6Ouka" in the body > > 2. Search against "too6Ouka": > # doveadm search -u username mailbox INBOX body too6Ouka

On 11/27/06, Scott Michel <scottm at rushg.aero.org> wrote: > Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > >>the official cutover. Granted, you might need darcs to pull the current > >>version out of its repo, since it was originally designed with darcs in > >>mind. > > > > I can confirm, that tailor converts LLVM CVS with all history preserved > > to mercurial

Hi list, Here it is: I have compiled with no problem courier-imap-4.0.4 on this arch (x86_64). Now I want to update my install with 4.0.6. I want to do this because the server is not yet in a production state, so if a major flaw affects courier-imap in the future, I could react more quickly. And indeed I'm encountering problems with the make process (Since I initialy build courier-imap

Hi, I seem to be having trouble getting more than 10 hits from Index#search_each since upgrading to 0.10.2 (ie, this was working in 0.9.4). Maybe a bug, as the #search_each doesn''t seem to use the options parameter any more ? Thanks, Neville =========================================== require ''rubygems'' require ''ferret'' p Ferret::VERSION idx =

Hi list, We are in the process of migrating our old (dovecot 1.2.4 based) mail system to the new one: - Centos 6 x86_64 - Dovecot 2.2.12 - Users in an openldap directory - clucene FTS I'm trying to trigger a full indexing for all the user and all their mailboxes (avoiding them to individually trigger it using a search within their MUA). I'm trying to use the "doveadm index"

I''m testing to see if two objects are equal. One is accessed directly from the fixture, and the other is accessed through a relationship. Here''s the test: def test_hero assert_equal players(:hero), hands(:first).hero end Anyway, the values are exactly the same as far as I can tell. The only difference is the object id, but Ruby compares the values, right? This just

On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:57 AM, David Greene wrote: > > Did the project ever come to a decision about making a transition to > git? I'm trying to do some longer-term planning and it would be helpful > to know what the roadmap is. Me too. I've been catching up on the thread from a couple weeks ago, and I didn't see any clear conclusion. I have some comments about the