similar to: samba4 as DC problems

I'm running the latest samba4 (git HEAD) After trying a samba_upgradeprovision (no errors reported) and samba-tool dbcheck (no errors reported), I now see this error repeating in the logs: [2013/05/09 23:12:48.671178, 0] ../lib/util/util.c:232(directory_create_or_exist_strict) invalid ownership on directory /usr/local/samba/private/smbd.tmp/msg [2013/05/09 23:12:48.671325, 0]

GPO's fail to apply on Windows clients and sysvol permission errors are logged. DC is Samba 4.13.0 created via a classic upgrade. Logged sysvol errors (uid 5025 is the system I ran gpupdate on, don't know what uid 3000011 refers to): =================================== Oct 25 12:17:09 srvr01 smbd[3762]: [2020/10/25 12:17:09.695062, 0]

Hello. I'm trying to perform a classic upgrade from Samba 3.6.6 with LDAP backend on Debian to 4.1.6 on Ubuntu on a new machine. The samba-tools creates the following *smb.con*f: *# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf** *[global] workgroup = SOMEDOM realm = somedom.local netbios name = SOMEDOM server role = member server passdb backend = samba_dsdb server

On 30/12/15 20:42, James wrote: > On 12/30/2015 3:29 PM, Rowland penny wrote: >> On 30/12/15 19:48, James wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm attempting to switch from the internal DNS to Bind. This is >>> for my Samba test environment on a VM running Samba 4.3.1 on Ubuntu >>> server 12.04.1. Installed Samba using all the defaults.

No takers thus far. These are the Samba 4.2 changes to which I previously referred (https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.2.0.html) : For the client side we have the following new options: "require strong key" (yes by default), "reject md5 servers" (no by default). E.g. for Samba 3.0.37 you need "require strong key = no" and for NT4 DCs

Hello all, This is with Samba 4.0.0rc6 with the built-in DNS server. Found the problem in Samba 4.0.0rc5 originally, then updated to see if bug had been fixed between rc5 and rc6. I am trying to get mail working for a subdomain that is being managed by Samba 4. I added an MX record, but the problem here is that the Samba 4 DNS server isn't replying with the record:

You may have included this in another email however I will ask anyway, did you set DNS to your server in the Linux and Windows clients? Can you check if a Windows Server can join? Can you use DNS management to check the DNS on you samba server? On Mar 28, 2016 2:15 PM, "Dale Schroeder" <dale at briannassaladdressing.com> wrote: > No takers thus far. These are the Samba 4.2

I have an NT domain on Debian Stretch. It's been upgraded numerous times, but has been running for almost a decade. Since upgrading from 4.1.17 to 4.3.3 (huge Debian jump), then to 4.3.6, clients cannot connect to shares. Prior to upgrading, I found the changes mentioned for 4.2 regarding NT domains and applied them. Even so, I still cannot connect to network shares nor print to

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1481 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1481.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: b2a379654a9be2aed1228345cf019826 arptables_jf-0.0.8-11.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: a208c4cc0ae27248aed29eda34052cbd arptables_jf-0.0.8-11.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1481 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1481.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 7932b5960c1173f1d8a3df5a756cbee8 arptables_jf-0.0.8-11.el5.i386.rpm Source: a208c4cc0ae27248aed29eda34052cbd arptables_jf-0.0.8-11.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:1481 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1481.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 2ae484b46a13bd0bb12031e252a4e13ee5c74705fed8fb576698f2c4e11a6163 glibc-2.17-157.el7_3.4.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1481 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1481 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 1305f6cbf0ffb348b0f72218e42a39bc5b11b5c6371595ccc2c7a5134a07b13e bpftool-3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64.rpm

Hi there, I've got 2 remote 2.0.6 servers, with exactly the same charasteristics (I believe) I've the following entrys in my lmhosts file: 192.168.7.20 haarlem #PRE #DOM:truckland 192.168.4.20 zaandam #PRE #DOM:truckland When I search for a computer with the name haarlem i get a result, but when I try to find zaandam it says 0 computers found... What could be the problem?

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1481 Bug ID: 1481 Summary: [ebtables-nft] ebtables -E gives error Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee:

Suppose this one breaks it: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/c4a85c9df948 ==> /var/log/mail.log <== Jun 1 14:01:30 spectre postfix/lmtp[456]: 3bN0qP5kwFzSy: to=<tlx at leuxner.net>, relay=spectre.leuxner.net[private/dovecot-lmtp], delay=1481, delays=1481/0/0.01/0.01, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (host spectre.leuxner.net[private/dovecot-lmtp] said: 451 4.3.0 <tlx at

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I'm trying to test/move some of my LDAP-enabled devices from my actual OpenLDAP server(s) to my new samba AD domain. For now, i'm poking with printers, and i'm testing a Konica-Minolta BizHub C224e. Defining user autentication to external source, i can set (between LDAP, NTLM, NDS, ...) 'Active Directory', and i can/must provide the domain naime. After that, DNS and kerberos

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I think you want the reduced blanking modeline: $ cvt -r 2560 1440 # 2560x1440 59.95 Hz (CVT 3.69M9-R) hsync: 88.79 kHz; pclk: 241.50 MHz Modeline "2560x1440R" 241.50 2560 2608 2640 2720 1440 1443 1448 1481 +hsync -vsync This matches your monitor's detailed timings: [ 55.220] (II) NOUVEAU(0): Supported detailed timing: [ 55.220] (II) NOUVEAU(0): clock: 241.5 MHz Image