similar to: syslinux.exe, on XP, fails to run on a USB stick

On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 04:51:52PM -0400, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Regid Ichira <regid23 at nt1.in> wrote: > > > label xp > > com32 chain.c32 > > append hd0 1 ntldr=/ntldr > > > 2. Installed by > > From xp cmd prompt: > > c:\downloadedPrograms\syslinux\syslinux.exe --active \ > >

My reason for patching circa line 225 is that I think it is clearer. The reason for patching circa line 575 is http://bugs.debian.org/647603. They concluded that a .0 file is recognized not only by PXELINUX. And what is NBP? --- a/doc/syslinux.txt 2011-12-07 04:53:29.201556663 +0200 +++ b/doc/syslinux.txt 2011-12-07 04:50:11.000000000 +0200 @@ -221,7 +221,6 @@ LABEL label The following

--- upsmon.8 2012-01-23 11:52:34.000000000 +0200 +++ upsmon.8.mod 2012-01-23 11:53:27.000000000 +0200 @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ upsmon \- UPS monitor and shutdown contr .sp \fBupsmon\fR \-c \fIcommand\fR .sp -\fBupsmon\fR [\-D] [\-p] [\-u \fIuser\fR] +\fBupsmon\fR [\-D] [\-K] [\-p] [\-u \fIuser\fR] .SH "DESCRIPTION" .sp \fBupsmon\fR is the client process that is responsible for

Platform: MS XP 1. cfg file: prompt 1 timeout 150 display /downloadedPrograms/syslinux/syslinux.cfg default xp label xp com32 chain.c32 append hd0 1 ntldr=/ntldr label de com32 chain.c32 append hd0 2 label memtest linux memtest86+.bin label hello com32 hello.c32 2. Installed by >From xp cmd prompt:

C:\syslinux>syslinux.exe -o xp c: At least one specified option not yet implemented for this installer. C:\syslinux>syslinux.exe -o xp -d . c: At least one specified option not yet implemented for this installer. syslinux.cfg has a lebel xp statement. Am I doing something wrong? If not, shouldn't http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/SYSLINUX#NT.2F2K.2FXP get fixed?

syslinux 6.01, on XP cmd prompt: With syslinux.exe --update c: At least one specified option not yet implemented for this installer. it is clear which option is not yet implemented. However, before trying just --update, I did try: syslinux.exe --active --directory /downloadedPrograms/syslinux \ --update --mbr c: (line was edited for presentation purposes) and got

I made several attepmts using the tree of 5.01 2013. My syslinux.cfg file has display /path_to/syslinux.cfg directive. 1. The installation, with a --directory option, was successful. After boot I got syslinux boot prompt. The syslinux.cfg was not displayed. I guess that means the MBR was there, but not the partition boot sector. Then I noticed the thread at

Argh! habits are hard to change. I've fixed the message again on the server, to satisfy the git format... Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ 2012/1/23 Arnaud Quette <aquette

1) With a running linux system, is there a switch to run extlinux with, ?? and read on the terminal the extlinux.sys version that is ?? installed? 2) Is there a directive to add to the conf file, to see that information ?? while booting? _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.

1. Which label is referred by -M, --menu-save=label Set the label to select as default on the next boot ? 2. With # grep 'label' /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf label 1 menu label An old linux version 2.1 What will be the consequences of # extlinux -M 1 /boot/extlinux and # extlinux -M 'An old linux version' /boot/extlinux 2.2 What are

Oh somehow I never noticed that "bootsecfile" option. That's probably what I need to use. I was looking at the source to see how the --mbr flag works and thought that there should be a way to do the same thing with the other mbr files. On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:41 AM poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: > On 04.08.2016 00:58, Erik Sandberg via Syslinux wrote: >

Green wrote: >Hello Mr.Dnavan Nelson, >And I thank very much for your contribution to CentOS Project. > >Now, I tested a RPM rebuild from yumi-2.0.7-2.rf.src.rpm but also >yumi-2.0.7-2.2.el4.rf.noarch.rpm in RHEL 4 and CentOS 4.0 i386. > >Though installation of "YUMI" finishes with no error message, >but it does EVEN NOT start by a "# yumi# command. >

Hi, I am trying to create a bootable linux usb drive using syslinux command as given below but I am getting error as given below syslinux4.exe -maf G: Return code : 1 Output : Error : Could not write the whole boot sector I have tried to do this with syslinux4, syslinux5, syslinux6 with the same error message. The usb drive is formatted to FAT32 drive system and has a capacity of 4GB. The OS

On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Regid Ichira <regid23 at nt1.in> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 04:51:52PM -0400, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Regid Ichira <regid23 at nt1.in> wrote: > Without --force I get: > Not a removable drive (use -f to override) > I tried now without --force, and to ignore the suggestion to use -f. > It

Description: Replace many usleep and some sleep calls with nanosleep. usleep is stated in its manual page as removed by POSIX. Contrary to its predecessors, nanosleep semantics is well defined. The replacement, which is mostly in drivers, is untested. Supplements http://bugs.debian.org/633791. Last-Update: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:04:48 +0300 Index:

Hello Sir, Following are the settings I used, Device: NO _Label (O:) Partition scheme and target system type: MBR partition scheme for BIOS or UEFI computers File System: FAT32 Cluster size: 4096 bytes (Default) New Volume label: (i)Quick format (ii)Create bootable disk using: MS-DOS (iii)Create extended label and icon files Format Options > Advanced Options: (i)List USB Hard

Here are some thoughts: 1. Customized Syslinux could be customized such that it refuses to boot from USB. No amount of version-matching nor downloading from the same source can help with that scenario. A different Syslinux would be needed, by definition (of the customizer) 2. Slightly less bad is where an ISO or CD/DVD is made with a key piece of non-ISOLINUX Syslinux missing

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 5:03 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 21/10/2019 15:47, Thomas Schweikle via samba wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Samba server set up for domain rufus.ada.de a proxy is reachable in > > proxy.ada.de. > > How are you running Samba ? > As ADDC. Please post your smb.conf. > OK. Here it is: [global]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 5:07 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 22/10/2019 15:52, Thomas Schweikle wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 5:03 PM Rowland penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> wrote: > > > > On 21/10/2019 15:47, Thomas Schweikle via samba wrote: >

Unfortunately I can't use GPT partitions because the usb stick are created by non-technical users and lots of them are still using xp 32 bits. Thanks 2014-09-26 15:42 GMT-03:00 Alexey Orishko <alexey.orishko at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Renato <renatoriolino at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The problem is that sometimes I have another USB stick on