Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "sysdata.rda vs. rda files in data directory"
2012 Jun 15
2
Build fails with sysdata.rda in R dir
Hi,
I am getting a strange error with 15.0 which I've not seen with previous
versions of R.
If sysdata.rda is included in R directory of the package I am getting:
R CMD build betfairly.roxygen/
* checking for file ?betfairly.roxygen/DESCRIPTION? ... OK
* preparing ?betfairly?:
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* excluding invalid files
Subdirectory 'R' contains invalid
2013 Feb 07
1
large sysdata.rda file --- strategies?
Hi,
to speed up computations in our RobASt family of packages, we use
interpolation on a grid of precomputed values which we save together
with the interpolating functions (results of splinefun essentially)
in sysdata.rda in the R folder of our pkg.
After adding grids for some more models, this file has grown
considerably, even after application of tools::resaveRdaFiles.
At the moment we are at
2011 Aug 16
2
sysdata.rda, namespaces and package dependencies
Hi all,
I'm struggling with accessing a package dataset (munsell.map, stored
in sysdata.rda) when that package is imported, not required. A simple
reproducible example is:
install.packages("munsell")
munsell::mnsl("10B 4/6")
# Error in match(col, munsell.map$name) : object 'munsell.map' not found
library(munsell)
munsell::mnsl("10B 4/6")
# Function
2020 Apr 28
2
R 4.0.0 build error with sysdata.rda on ppc64el architecture
The R 4.0.0 package migration on Debian is being held back by a failed build
on ppc64el [1]. We can see from the history of builds logs [2] that it used
to build, briefly failed, worked again and then failed leading to R 4.0.0's
release. (And my bad for missing how the alpha1/alpha2/beta/rc builds failed.)
I have however neither changed anything, nor did I ever have to accomodate
ppc64el (as
2020 Apr 30
2
[External] Re: R 4.0.0 build error with sysdata.rda on ppc64el architecture
On 30 April 2020 at 09:11, luke-tierney at uiowa.edu wrote:
| On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| Maybe I missed something. How is the 'compiler' package involved?
See the other email thread; you replied (~ 26 hours ago) to my message adding
that "sysdata.rda in 'tools' hanging was wrong". It gets to the next stage,
which is 'compiler'.
We know by
2016 May 01
2
Storage of byte code-compiled functions in sysdata.rda
Hi r-devels,
we are seeing a new problem with our packages RobAStRDA (just new on CRAN, thanks
to Uwe and Kurt!) and RobExtremes (to be submitted).
It must be something recent with the way you internally treat/store byte-code compiled
functions, as we have no problems with R-3.1.3, but do see an "Error in fct(x) : byte code
version mismatch" with R-devel SVNrev r70532.
Background:
2016 May 01
2
Storage of byte code-compiled functions in sysdata.rda
Thanks, Luke, for having a look to it.
Sure, I can give you some reproducible example -- even in two degrees of
completeness ;-): see below.
Thanks again, Peter
%-----------------------------------
(I) first example
%-----------------------------------
Just to reproduce the error, on r-devel, try:
install.packages("RobAStRDA")
require(RobAStRDA)
getFromNamespace(".RMXE", ns
2020 Apr 29
0
R 4.0.0 build error with sysdata.rda on ppc64el architecture
Hum, at least it is not Apple, so maybe you can attach a debugger to the running process? (gdb -p process_id or something like that --- haven't actually done it for a decade). Then at least we can get a stack trace and a clue about where it is looping. Diddling optimization options can also sometimes provide a clue.
-pd
> On 29 Apr 2020, at 01:17 , Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at
2016 May 05
0
Storage of byte code-compiled functions in sysdata.rda
I can't reproduce the more complex version. But the package on CRAN
fails in the same way on 3.2.3 and 3.3.0.
The problem is that your sysdata.rda includes a function that is
generating this error. If you do
f <- getFromNamespace(".RMXE", ns ="RobAStRDA")[["GEVFamily"]][["fun.N"]][[1]]
g <- get("fct", environment(f))
and look at the
2020 Apr 30
3
R 4.0.0 build error with sysdata.rda on ppc64el architecture
On 30 April 2020 at 09:42, I?aki Ucar wrote:
| On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 02:49, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
| > And to keep the list abreast, this appears to be related to the long double
| > issue on powerpc where needed an extra #define to ensure compilation. That
[...]
| Which reminds me that [1] was required for v3.6.2. Could be related?
Yes, that is what I refered
2016 May 01
0
Storage of byte code-compiled functions in sysdata.rda
Can you provide a complete reproducible example?
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 1, 2016, at 6:51 AM, Peter Ruckdeschel <peter.ruckdeschel at web.de> wrote:
>
> Hi r-devels,
>
> we are seeing a new problem with our packages RobAStRDA (just new on CRAN, thanks
> to Uwe and Kurt!) and RobExtremes (to be submitted).
>
> It must be something recent with the way you
2013 Jan 17
2
error installing KEGGSOAP
Hi, I am new to bioconductor, trying to install KEGGSOAP package, but got warnings() when installing and error message when trying to load the package, can anyone suggest what went wrong?
many thanks
John
> source("http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R")
Bioconductor version 2.11 (BiocInstaller 1.8.3), ?biocLite for help
> biocLite("KEGGSOAP")
BioC_mirror:
2020 Apr 30
0
R 4.0.0 build error with sysdata.rda on ppc64el architecture
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 02:49, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 29 April 2020 at 11:22, peter dalgaard wrote:
> | Hum, at least it is not Apple, so maybe you can attach a debugger to the running process? (gdb -p process_id or something like that --- haven't actually done it for a decade). Then at least we can get a stack trace and a clue about where it is
2020 Apr 30
0
[External] Re: R 4.0.0 build error with sysdata.rda on ppc64el architecture
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 30 April 2020 at 09:42, I?aki Ucar wrote:
> | On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 02:49, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
> | > And to keep the list abreast, this appears to be related to the long double
> | > issue on powerpc where needed an extra #define to ensure compilation. That
> [...]
> | Which reminds me
2020 Apr 30
2
R 4.0.0 build error with sysdata.rda on ppc64el architecture
On 29 April 2020 at 11:22, peter dalgaard wrote:
| Hum, at least it is not Apple, so maybe you can attach a debugger to the running process? (gdb -p process_id or something like that --- haven't actually done it for a decade). Then at least we can get a stack trace and a clue about where it is looping. Diddling optimization options can also sometimes provide a clue.
(Missed this earlier as
2015 Dec 31
4
R, AIX 64-bit builds - trying to understand root cause for message: "Error: Line starting 'Package: tools ...' is malformed!"
On 2015-12-30 09:58, Michael Felt wrote:
> On 2015-12-29 11:02, Michael Felt wrote:
>> This seems to be a problem that goes back a long time - and I hope
>> someone who understands what tre is suppossed to be doing will look
>> at this.
>>
>> A short history of other people who have reported on this on
>> different versions of AIX. I shall only add that I
2016 Jan 01
2
R, AIX 64-bit builds - trying to understand root cause for message: "Error: Line starting 'Package: tools ...' is malformed!"
Ok, found the problem - on platforms that support it TRE uses wint_t (from wchar.h) as its type for characters (tre_cint_t) which on AIX is *signed* int. TRE uses liberally conversions between int and tre_cint_t apparently assuming that the latter is unsigned so conversions back to int are suitable for comparisons etc. On other platforms wint_t is unsigned so it works. Manually defining tre_cint_t
2015 Dec 29
2
R, AIX 64-bit builds - trying to understand root cause for message: "Error: Line starting 'Package: tools ...' is malformed!"
This seems to be a problem that goes back a long time - and I hope
someone who understands what tre is suppossed to be doing will look at this.
A short history of other people who have reported on this on different
versions of AIX. I shall only add that I get the same results on AIX 5.3
TL7, AIX 6.1 TL9 and AIX 7.1 TL3.
Basically, with settings that work for AIX and 32-bit - the only changes
2016 Jan 03
4
R, AIX 64-bit builds - trying to understand root cause for message: "Error: Line starting 'Package: tools ...' is malformed!"
On 2016-01-01 23:48, peter dalgaard wrote:
> Nice catch you two!!!
>
> Happy New Year
> -pd
I am much happier with this great start!
Simon - which compiler)s) did you use: xlc and xlfortran, or gcc/gfortran?
I have made some changes to configure(.ac) so maybe my problems are
self-inflicted. But would be good to know what environment you are using.
Thanks for looking - and
2015 Dec 17
5
Assistance much appreciated
I have been struggling with this error message - and think I finally
understand it's context.
Start
Line by line debugging shows me the function works:
...
> saveRDS(val, mapfile)
> val
$variables
$variables$IANA_HTTP_status_code_db
[1] 0 1256
$variables$IANA_URI_scheme_db
[1] 1256 3458
$variables$table_of_HTTP_status_codes
[1] 4714 830
$references
named list()
$compressed