similar to: Question around updates and drpms directory

On 3/23/19 9:19 AM, Bez Thomas wrote: >> On Mar 22, 2019, at 9:52 PM, Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: >> >> Was just doing a (very) belated update on a 7.5 system and ran into >> this set of errors: >> > >> Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. >> > > >> >> so, anybody know why

We are having issues with drpms on CentOS-6 i386 and x86_64 and on CentOS-7 x86_64. The technical issues sometimes cause us to have to rebuild all drpms over again .. and the time involved is very large.? Also storing the drpms and moving them around takes up a lot of space and bandwidth. We would like to remove delta rpms (drpms) from our CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 repositories. But before we do ,

Has anybody successfully implemented DRPMs on centos 5.x? I searched the net and I found a few indications that it is possible, but there is very little info how to do it. Just to be clear. With DRPMs i mean deltaRPMs. And with implementation i mean What yum plugins are necessary and what has to be done on the yum repository to make it work. BR Janez -------------- next part -------------- An

On 3/25/19 6:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 3/23/19 9:19 AM, Bez Thomas wrote: >>> On Mar 22, 2019, at 9:52 PM, Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: >>> >>> Was just doing a (very) belated update on a 7.5 system and ran into >>> this set of errors: >>> >> >>> Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild.

Hi list, Sorry for the exclude question... but I have been trying for hours to get this to work and am utterly baffled. I'm performing an archive transfer between hosts and wish to include anything in any directory named 'debug' or 'drpms' at any depth. I assumed this would be as simple as --exclude 'debug/***' --exclude 'drpms/***' but I still get

Was just doing a (very) belated update on a 7.5 system and ran into this set of errors: ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Updating: polkit x86_64 0.112-18.el7_6.1

> We would like to remove delta rpms (drpms) from our CentOS-6 and > CentOS-7 repositories. > I live on fast connections both at home and work and for me I see no real advantage to delta RPMs - I've not really measured it, but it seems like my systems spend more time reconstructing the RPMs than they ever did downloading things. So it is of no consequence to *me* if they are done

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0230 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0230 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 491b63a51365bb112538c3cc527cc9a0f9cbb8599989268b2367a88b6923e39d polkit-0.112-18.el7_6.1.i686.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I have run a local repo for Centos updates for some time. I suppose, at this point I could just delete the 5.3 update directory and rsync the 5.4 directory... But how large is the 5.4 update directory? Oh, just for i386, without /debug and is there anything else I should not include? For example for my FC11 update repo I also exclude drpms.

On 3/25/19 8:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > This is not the first time we have had issues with drpms in the update tree. > Would anyone be opposed to taking away deltarpms from the repositories? > > They take up lots of space and they have cause multiple issues in the past. > > Thoughts? Due to the disk churn deltarpms need and our own internal mirroring of centos packages, one

On 07/05/2017 23:50, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > You have two issues: > > (a) nouveau's GL driver messed something up, causing a read fault error > (b) nouveau's kernel driver tried to recover. It failed. > > Solution to #1: None, really. You can try updating mesa, and hope it > helps. Not sure what version you're on. Here's my packages version: ii

Hi all, My goal is to have PHP 5.2.x on a centos virtual machine (LXC) Looking at the repositories: - 6.2 has php 5.3: ftp://ftp.free.fr/mirrors/ftp.centos.org/6.2/updates/i386/drpms/ - 5.7 has php 5.1 ftp://ftp.free.fr/mirrors/ftp.centos.org/5.7/updates/i386/RPMS/ I'll have to rebuild a source RPM in order to have what I want: - Which base should I install for a php 5.2 VM? 6.2 or 5.7? -

Hi, I launched an AWS instance `t2.medium` (use CentOS 7 image "ami-7abd0209", product code: https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW), which is supposed to have 4GB Memory in total, but turn out it is only "3.5GB". ``` $ free -h total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 3.5G 441M 1.4G 16M

I have an ext4 filesystem for which the reported disk usage is not correct. I have noticed the discrepancy after I rsync-ed the content to another filesystem and noticed that the used space on the target is almost double of the size reported on the source. Both machines are running the same software - with the same kernel version and same coreutils version (which I later upgraded to latest

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I have a Win2K Server that acts as a file server to a bunch of Macintosh machines on the network. Today I installed samba-3.0.5 on a Fedora1 machine, and mounted one of the server shares and tried to read it. Much to my surprise, I found files that are being listed like this: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 May 13 16:30 Icon?* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 25649 Aug 23 2000 webslide151.gif*

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0614 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0614.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: bd3e0c4b2239945824d9e7c8da6d029165b3d2d4988c2d6adacf2d8161c0a5e6 xulrunner-17.0.3-2.el5_9.i386.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Some additional data: - putting LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 in /etc/environment makes indeed the system work (for my current usage, the slowness is acceptable in exchange of stabillity) - I still get lock-up using mesa from git (17.2~git1705081930.25d2 from this repository https://launchpad.net/~oibaf/+archive/ubuntu/graphics-drivers) I have another question (probably Ben Skeggs could also give an