similar to: postfix+dovecot+samba4+openldap: dovecot lda:Error: user sammy: Initialization failed: mail_location not set and autodetection failed

Hi All, I'm trying to migrate from an NT4 domain to samba-3... sorry this is so long... when I run the "net rpc vampire" I get errors for users and machines in uppercase or contain uppercase chars. I'm in a test env before I go live! I'm on a gentoo distro w/ shadow. useradd FOO errors, this might be the culprit... I set up some dummy accts and made them members of

Oops, forgot to put a subject... apologies for the repost... (newb!) > Hi All, > > I'm trying to migrate from an NT4 domain to samba-3... > sorry this is so long... > > when I run the "net rpc vampire" I get errors for users and machines > in uppercase or contain uppercase chars. > > I'm in a test env before I go live! > > I'm on a

Hello everybody, I got tree UPS devices connected to a Debian server, and i am searching for a way to configure them. The server power-cord is only connected to one of the ups devices, and should monitor the other ups systems to sent email status. I got a HP R3000XR UPS with has a RS232 communication port that I have working perfectly. Then I have two APC SmartUPS 750V devices that are

Hello! First of all, 100x thanks to Monty and colleagues: you have done an excellent job! I just didn't believe my ears when I first tested Oggenc 1.0 at q0 to q1 - it sounds AMAZINGLY GOOD !!! But as HDD drives are getting larger and cheaper, most of us move toward higher quality settings ......... I use q8, because: - I was able to ABX some test samples up to q4.99 - at q8 Ogg is still

Hi, currently I'm trying to extend my existing backup concept but I have issues due to symlinks. rsync has problems with symlinks. First some background information: I regularly back up my / and /home from my desktop PC and my netbook to my Synology DiskStation (500GB) using rsync 3.0.6 with this script: http://pastebin.com/m43d4e353 . This works without any error messages. On the DS

>>> Agustín Dall'Alba <agustin at dallalba.com.ar> schrieb am 14.04.2017 um 22:53 in Nachricht <CAHBqS-w3v44WM5x+_4XdFMkD42A2iYTbEWKEBmvJc2P3Y-LJGA at mail.gmail.com>: > I halved the volume of the sample before encoding with > `sox -v 0.5 floex.wav quiet.wav` and now I can't ABX it succesfully anymore. > So the artifact I heard was just clipping when encoding

I halved the volume of the sample before encoding with `sox -v 0.5 floex.wav quiet.wav` and now I can't ABX it succesfully anymore. So the artifact I heard was just clipping when encoding or decoding. Opus remains unbeaten for me at 133 kbps. That's totally awesome. Cheers On 10 April 2017 at 17:14, Agustín Dall'Alba <agustin at dallalba.com.ar> wrote: > Hello! I found a

I've been running through a collection of hard to encode samples that the lame developers use, and others, doing ABX testing at various quality levels looking for my personal sweet spot. Last time I did this for RC3 I found that most samples where pretty transparent around the 3.5-4 region (my ears aren't that well trained, and I don't want them to be :-), but this time I noticed

Hello! I found a sample I can ABX successfully when encoded at 133.333 kbps. I was targetting 1 MB/min. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8KWShoIrA1kQzR1Z0FFRUlfcEU floex.wav is 4:54–5:04 of a lossless copy of 'Forget-me-not' by Floex, downloaded from http://store.floex.cz/album/zorya floex-133.opus was created with `opusenc --bitrate 133.333333 floex.wav floex-133.opus`,

I was able to ABX 60.wav from the lame samples up to q=5.9 (13/16 tries at that quality level). I failed to ABX it at q=6.0 (8/16). The sample exhibits a pumping artifact; a "fluttering", if you will, of the amplitude. The effect becomes more pronounced as quality setting / bitrate decreases. Any thoughts? Also - if anyone replies to this, could you CC me a copy? I'm not on the

Interesting. Not what I expected. This is Ruby 1.8.6. > irb irb(main):001:0> str = "abx\bc" => "abx\bc" irb(main):002:0> str.length => 5 irb(main):003:0> s = str.sub(/.\b/, '''') => "ab\bc" irb(main):004:0> s.length => 4 irb(main):005:0> s = str.sub(/.\x08/, '''') => "abc"

I want to extra the part of the formula not including the response variable from an lm object. For example if the lm object ABx.lm was created by the call ABx.lm <- lm( y ~ A + B + x, ...) Then ACx.lm is saved as part of a workspace. I wish to extract "~ A + B + x". Later in my code I will fit another linear model of the form z ~ A + B + x for some other response variable z. I

When I use rbind() or rbind.data.frame() to add a row to an existing dataframe, it appears that attributes for the column of type "factor" are dropped. See the sample example below to reproduce the problem. Please suggest How I can fix this. Thanks, Sammy a=c("Male", "Male", "Female", "Male") b=c(1,2,3,4) c=c("great", "bad",

Hi all When creating unit tests, I wondered whether I should rather use the following... people(:sam).name = "Sammy" people(:sam).city = "Blah" ...or rather the following form: @sam = people(:sam) @sam.name = "Sammy" @sam.city = "Blah" Thanks Josh -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

using iTunes i've noticed that AAC is very good at re-encoding own lossy sound. let's test Opus! neroaacenc.exe -q 0.75 -if 000.wav -of 001.m4a neroaacdec.exe -if 001.m4a -of aac001.wav wavdiff.exe 000.wav aac001.wav Comparing 000.wav - aac001.wav... Max diff: -17.3867dB RMS diff: -33.0851dB Mean diff: -32.4582dB opusenc.exe --bitrate 512 "000.wav" 001.opus opusdec.exe 001.opus

On 7 Nov 2017 13:36, Lucas Clemente Vella <lvella at gmail.com> wrote: 2017-11-07 11:10 GMT-02:00 encrupted anonymous <sergeinakamoto at gmail.com<mailto:sergeinakamoto at gmail.com>>: did another test of many. NeroAAC q=1 @400kbps and Vorbis q=10 @412kbps shared 2nd place. OPUS @330 kbps - 3rd place. LAME MP3 q=0 @320 kbps - 1st place. ---JPEG file attached--- Please disable

Opus is specifically designed to survive tandeming but you need to keep the frames aligned and not mess with the gain, which your tools probably do not do. On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:58 PM, encrupted anonymous < sergeinakamoto at gmail.com> wrote: > using iTunes i've noticed that AAC is > very good at re-encoding own lossy sound. > let's test Opus! > > neroaacenc.exe

Anybody know where I can find ABX samples (original and ogg) that used RC3 or better encoding? The only ones I've been able to find are RC2 (or RC1) PS - on a side note, on pcabx.com's "very easy" training samples, I seem to be completely deaf to the differences between the "Original" and their "test" samples. (Distortion sample only), but I do hear

Dear R users, I am mailing you about the graphical output of silhouette (cluster package) From the example of silhouette in help(silhouette): > ar <- agnes(ruspini) > si3 <- silhouette(cutree(ar, k = 5), # k = 4 gave the same as pam() above + daisy(ruspini)) > plot(si3, nmax = 80, cex.names = 0.5) from which one may conclude that group 1 is composed by

This is the new page after the first feedback round: http://audio.sinderman.com/ Comments? Conclusions? Developers feedback? Can someone ABX 60.wav with 60.ogg -q 0? Cheers, AGS. P.S. Garf/Erik, I have included some comments from EAQUAL's author. <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this