similar to: [OT] NJABL

CharlesMarcus LOL, you kinda contradicted yourself here charlie boy and personal RBL? yup, but its not just used by me, its used by a few if you read the link, a few involving millions of emails a day, but shouldnt be a problem giving the geographical locations... and lied? list msgs caught in spam rules, I guess you dont know how to configure SA URI's... now, please stop trying to avoid

Gents, I have added the following to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and rebuilt it trying to control spam. I still get about 25 spam messages a day. Is there something else that can help control spam? Thanks jerry --------------------------- dnl # dnl # dnsbl - DNS based Blackhole List/Black List/Rejection list dnl # See http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#dnsbl dnl # FEATURE(`dnsbl',

Built for years every version using: ./configure --with-usb Configuration summary: ====================== build serial drivers: yes build USB drivers: yes build SNMP drivers: yes build neon based XML driver: yes build Powerman PDU client driver: no build IPMI driver: no enable SSL development code: yes enable libwrap (tcp-wrappers) support: yes build CGI programs: no enable HAL support: no

I know this unnecessary lookups question is really a postfix one, but I'm curious if anyone else sees the behaviour of postfix continuing looking up users after it clearly have got its answer that it is "not a local domain" response. (this msg is an extract from what I sent to WV some time ago, with him showing absolutely no interest, I got bored tonight so thought I'd throw

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.montanhydraulik.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, You just sent an email to my

This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://www.silvervalley.k12.ca.us/index.php/195 for more details. This isn't spam? Please forward this message to postmaster@silvervalley.k12.ca.us with a request that the e-mail address you received this from be whitelisted. Content preview: Hi! Anyone know

Hi all. I got blocked with the first post and and the message now has been posted multiple times! Sorry about that :( Kind Regards, Keith Begin forwarded message: > From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON at nhs-pd1e-esg106.ad1.nhs.net> > Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender > Date: 10 July 2015 09:30:06 BST > To: <Keith.Roberts at ecric.nhs.uk> > >

mailing list subscription and C/R system mail does not harmonize! Warren - whoever you are - please subscribe with a mail address which accepts delivery without such nasty bounces! (Got the bounce instantly to my last reply to "Error when starting apache".) Alexander -----Weitergeleitete Nachricht----- > From: centos.5.warren at recursor.net > To: ad+lists at uni-x.org >

I have centos 4.8 i686. It has stock sendmail. see file below. I am getting reports that it is an open relay. I have searched all around and it seems like it should be closed. I have dnl for accept_unresolvable_domains. What can I do to close my sendmail. Thanks, Jerry My sendmail.mc is as follows: --------------------------------- divert(-1)dnl dnl # dnl # This is the sendmail macro config

I have enabled the feature in sendmail.mc to check with spamhaus for spammers. However since this block is being made at MTA level, I would like to know is something can be done to obtain statistics of blocked attemps. thanks -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Erick Perez Panama Sistemas Integradores de Telefonia IP y Soluciones Para Centros de Datos Panama,

dnsbl's are a popular method to prevent listed ips from making connections to mta software. cf. postscreen_dnsbl_sites in postfix Would it be possible to introduce such a feature in dovecot, so that connections can be denied based on a dnsbl lookup (where the precise dnsbls used are configurable)? John

On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:34:34 +1000 Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > On 21/03/2016 17:06, Andre Rodier wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Sorry if I am off topic a little. > > > > I am looking for an email host provider that supports dovecot, sieve > > and manage sieve. Ideally with the roundcube webmail and managesieve > > plugin >

Dear All, Is there any easy way to upgrade Dovecot like yum command? Or I have to delete the current and install the new version then change the setting?> I will appreciate if you can tell me the steps please? Best Regards Arif --- On Fri, 1/10/10, dovecot-request at dovecot.org <dovecot-request at dovecot.org> wrote: From: dovecot-request at dovecot.org <dovecot-request at

On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:42 +1000 Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +0000 > > James <lista at xdrv.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > >> > >> > zfs set sync=disabled ? > >> >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Franck CALLEJA wrote: > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:50:21 +0200 > From: Franck CALLEJA <fc193 at hotmail.com> > Reply-To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> > To: "dovecot at dovecot.org" <dovecot at dovecot.org> > Subject: Sieve plugin (fc17 + sendmail + roundcube) > >

Dear All, Thanks for all your replied but still I don't know how to install from 1.0.7 to 1.2.14. What should I consider to keep the same configuration during or after upgrade? It is the first time I am trying to upgrade my Dovecot. Thank a lot for your help --- On Fri, 1/10/10, dovecot-request at dovecot.org <dovecot-request at dovecot.org> wrote: From: dovecot-request at

Dunno, your email provider doesn't want to talk to me, heh, screw them :) They claim i'm on an rbl, no rbl checks verify this. Even tried to submit a request using their website, but it's broken and doesn't work (http://postmaster.ausics.net/pmg.php) ----- Forwarded message from patrickdk at patrickdk.com ----- Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:31:37 -0400 From: Patrick

I have had the same email address since 1997 (when microsoft stole bob.com from me thanks to network solutions...) In the early days I of course was free with my email and used it everwhere. Fast forward to 2012, some 15 years later. woof..the amount of spam sent to me has always just kept getting worse and worse. On my centos 5 server I just used sendmail with spamassassin and it killed a

On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:19:12 +1000 Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > mail_location Optionally disable indexes using :INDEX=MEMORY > > don't use this on IMAP boxes, but is safe to use on SMTP and POP3's > boxes though > > eg: > > mail_location = > maildir:/var/vmail/%Ld/%1Ln/%1.1Ln/%2.1Ln/%Ln/Maildir:INDEX=MEMORY > > --

Your IP address is flagged as spam in Real Time Block Lists. Are you using a dynamic IP address? You may have a mis-configured server that is allowing spammers to relay through your server. Another possibility is your system is compromised with a spambot. Mike On 07/24/2018 07:31 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > OK, not sure what happened, my response was rejected by Centos: > > Reason: There was