similar to: parallel execution in R

Hi Devang, GlobalModRefPass is also a ModulePass and it uses CallGraph Analysis. So, I think it should not necessary to extend CallGraphSCCPass to use CallGraph information. Module Pass shoule be sufficient... --Kapil On 10/8/08, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Kapil, > > On Oct 8, 2008, at 10:19 AM, kapil anand wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I

On Oct 8, 2008, at 10:59 AM, kapil anand wrote: > Hi Devang, > > GlobalModRefPass is also a ModulePass and it uses CallGraph Analysis. > So, I think it should not necessary to extend CallGraphSCCPass to use > CallGraph information. Module Pass shoule be sufficient... ok, but you're Registering your pass in CallGraph Analysis group. What if you remove

Hi all, I''m having a little trouble with strtok: require ''win32/api'' include Win32 strtok = API.new(''strtok'', ''PP, ''P'', ''msvcrt'') string = "A string\tof ,,tokens\nand some more tokens"; seps = " ,\t\n"; puts "Tokens:" token = strtok.call(string, seps) while token puts

Hi all, Ok, I have: login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r lport=%{lport} mpid=%e %c session=<%{session}> We only allow inbound IMAP, and only SSL on port 993. Looking at the logs, %c is obviously the encryption type, but... Why does it say 'TLS', when it technically (there is a difference after all) should say 'SSL'? Not a big deal, but it is

Greetings - I''ve just started testing Puppet and have a couple of questions: 1. Is there a way to dynamically change a configuraion file that is sent to nodes? For example, I want to modify /etc/hosts to have the hostname and ip address set dynamically - the hosts file shoule look like: 12.34.56.78 node1.example.com 22.35.66.99 server1.example.com But I don''t want to

Greetings, I have problem using Dom0 as NFS(v4)-server and DomU as client. When ever the client actually tries to copy data to nfs-server the virtual network (bridge) between the two hosts completely freezes and stops working. After this of course the client hangs waiting nfs-server to answer and server continues to try to contact nfslock daemon on the client. Dom0 is still accessible from

Hi everyone! I use the libvirt(version: 1.2.2) and QEMU(version: 2.2.1) to test qemu snapshot features: I tried virsh blockcommit when VM offline, the virsh blockcommit failed: the error messase as below: error: Requested operation is not valid: domain is not running when I start the VM, the virsh blockcommit work fine! my question is : we

Hi Bob, Set the rights like this. > /home 775 > > /home/samba 775 > > /home/samba/DT***RM 775 > > /home/samba/DT***RM/profiles 777 for the profiles, after you set the rights in windows, user profiles folders wil be created with the correct rights. and only accessable by the user.. and from here you shoule be able to set the correct rights. Can you give it a try?

Hi Kapil, On Oct 8, 2008, at 10:19 AM, kapil anand wrote: > Hi all, > > I need a new kind of analysis on LLVM Module, so I made a new pass > to do this. This new pass extends the ModulePass class and follows > the conventions used in GlobalModRefPass, which is also a Module > Pass.I need the CallGraph analysis for this pass, hence I have added >

HI Devang, Initially I had not added this pass to the group and I got this error regarding PassManager. I added the pass to group just to check whether that removes the error or not... I have removed it again. Is there any other registration required to configure pass manager for the pass? --Kapil On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > > On

Hi guys, I was wondering why this piece of code doesn't work: foreach (i = c(1.25,1.50)) %dopar% { assign(paste("test_",i,sep=""),i) } but, this does: foreach (i = c(1.25,1.50)) %do% { assign(paste("test_",i,sep=""),i) } Obviously, the difference is %dopar% vs. %do%. If I use %do%, I get objects test_1.25 and test_1.50, but I don't get these

Dear R-SIG-Debian, I am using R version 3.1.2 with rstudio-server 0.98.113 on debian build 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.68-1+deb7u1 x86_64 GNU/Linux. I often use the %dopar% operator in from the foreach package to run code in parallel. However, the only other use on the box seemingly installed a few items and suddenly %dopar% will use far more than the number of cores I am specifying and

Hi everyone, I'm working on a script trying to use foreach %dopar% but without success, so I manage to run the code with foreach %do% and looks like this: The code is part of a MCMC model for projects valuation, returning the most important results (VPN, TIR, EVA, etc.) of the simulation. foreach (simx = NsimT, .combine=cbind, .inorder=FALSE, .verbose=TRUE) %do% { MCPVMPA = MCVAMPA[simx]

Hi all, I need a new kind of analysis on LLVM Module, so I made a new pass to do this. This new pass extends the ModulePass class and follows the conventions used in GlobalModRefPass, which is also a Module Pass.I need the CallGraph analysis for this pass, hence I have added (addRequired(CallGraph)) in getAnalysisUsage function of this new pass. I also added it to CallGraph Analysis group through

>From 030135224dd6563af0fb8615dc6a4b8e6084410d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa at bluextal.(none)> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:25:26 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] libvirt/qemu : support attach/detach-disk --persistent Now, only Xen supports 'virsh attach/detach-disk XXXX --persistent', modifying inactive domain definition via virsh. This patch adds a

On 03/24/2016 03:54 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 24.03.2016 um 04:21 schrieb Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net>: >> mysql Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.95, for redhat-linux-gnu (x86_64) using >> readline 5.1 > > > > Current version on C5 is mysql55, 5.0 does not get any updates anymore! > Let me reiterate this: the mysql-5.0.95* packages are not supported.

Dear R-List member, tried implement the foreach loop. It works fine, when I'm using %do%, but not when I'm using %dopar%. I always receive one of the following error messages: error in { : task 1 failed - "Objekt 'S3' not found" - could the .export be an solution for this?? Any help is much appreciated! The Code hast the following structure: ########## dft3 =

All, I am not understanding the scoping used in foreach when it is used inside a function. I keep getting "could not find function" errors for functions that are in memory when I try to use foreach within a function call. I have a simple example below. "testFun" is in memory and works when called by foreach directly, but when I place foreach in a function called

Hello Mikis: Thanks a lot, it worked. Could you tell me what the problem was? Regards, Nik ----- Original Message ----- From: r-help-request at r-project.org To: "r-help" Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2018 6:00:02 AM Subject: R-help Digest, Vol 181, Issue 11 Send R-help mailing list submissions to r-help at r-project.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Hi, I'm trying to submit my first package which depends on doParallel: Depends: R (>= 3.0), igraph, doParallel Running hadley devtools: devtools::check() and devtools::release() result in no problem (no ERROR nor NOTE on Linux, Mac and Windows). However, when in use the devtools::build_win() command, it results in the following note: * checking R code for possible problems ... NOTE