Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Bug#701554: xcp-xapi: bashism in /bin/sh script"
2012 Oct 16
1
Bug#690612: xcp-xapi-debug: bashism in /bin/sh script
Package: xcp-xapi-debug
Version: 1.3.2-11
Severity: normal
User: debian-release at lists.debian.org
Usertags: goal-dash
Hello maintainer,
While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts'
package) check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making
use of a bashism.
checkbashisms' output:
>possible bashism in
2012 Oct 16
1
Bug#690710: xcp-xapi: bashism in /bin/sh script
Package: xcp-xapi
Version: 1.3.2-11
Severity: important
User: debian-release at lists.debian.org
Usertags: goal-dash
Hello maintainer,
While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts'
package) check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making
use of a bashism.
checkbashisms' output:
>possible bashism in
2012 Oct 16
1
Bug#690630: blktap-utils: bashism in /bin/sh script
Package: blktap-utils
Version: 2.0.90-1
Severity: important
User: debian-release at lists.debian.org
Usertags: goal-dash
Hello maintainer,
While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts'
package) check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making
use of a bashism.
checkbashisms' output:
>possible bashism in ./usr/sbin/vhdpartx line 40
2020 Nov 05
1
Some packages have non-POSIX-compliant shell scripts. Implement a CRAN check for bashisms?
Dear R-devel,
Recently I ran into trouble installing two separate packages, nloptr and ncdf4, both due to the same issue: they have scripts that have the shebang `#! /bin/sh', but have bashisms in them, i.e. non-POSIX-compliant bash scripts.
I use dash [1] as my shell environment, since it's about 4x as fast as bash. It looks like it's recently also become the default shell for
2012 Oct 23
0
Bug#690630: Fixe for bashism in part/vhdpartx (see http://bugs.debian.org/690630)
Hi Mike and Jon,
I have made a patch for blktap's vhdpartx script which is full of
bashism. I also uploaded that to the git on alioth. Please apply it
upstream. I'll see with the release team if it's worth uploading a fix
for Wheezy.
Cheers,
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
2012 Oct 24
0
Bug#690612: Fixes bashism in xen-api
Hi,
Here's a patch fixing bashism in !/bin/sh scripts in xen-api. Please
apply this upstream as well.
Cheers,
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Fixes-2-bashism.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 3639 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2012 May 18
1
[Bug 2010] New: bashism in configure seccomp_filter check
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2010
Bug #: 2010
Summary: bashism in configure seccomp_filter check
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.0p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Build system
2008 Oct 04
3
Bug#501087: nut: support for a tripplite avr750u
Hi Raphael,
btw, are you 2 bugs today a simple coincidence with my linkedIn
invitation yesterday? ;-)
2008/10/4 Raphael Geissert <atomo64 at gmail.com>:
> Package: nut
> Version: 2.2.2-8
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Attached is a patch adding "support" for tripplite's avr750u UPS.
> Issues:
> * productid still needs to be specified in
2012 May 23
2
Bug#674137: xcp-xapi: default ports in xapi
Package: xcp-xapi
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Are there good reasons why xapi by default prefers to bidn to 80 and
443? This will lead to xapi installation/start failure on every server
machine that might (and will probably) have apache installed.
I know we can remove apache or change its port or change xapi's port
(But I've had a hard time to easily find out where to specify the
2012 Jul 06
1
Bug#680499: xcp-xapi: Http_client.Http_request_rejected during upgrade
Package: xcp-xapi
Version: 1.3.2-8
Severity: minor
During upgrade from 1.3.2-7 to 1.3.2-8 got follwing message on slave host (upgrade was simulatanious on slave and master):
...
Setting up xcp-xapi (1.3.2-8) ...
The server failed to handle your request, due to an internal error. The given message may give details useful for debugging the problem.
message: INTERNAL_ERROR: [
2012 May 29
1
Bug#675052: xcp-xapi: xe vm-memory-target-set does not write target to xenstore
Package: xcp-xapi
Version: 1.3.2-6
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
xe vm-memory-target-set does not write new target to /local/domain/ID/memory/target. Balloon in guest domain is expecting this value to be changed to do selfballooning.
This breaks 'dynamic memory control' feature.
Steps to reproduce:
1) Setup any PV virtual machine with static-memory-min < static-memory-max
2)
2012 Jun 24
1
Bug#678723: xcp-xapi: vif-interfaces added to database as PIF's
Package: xcp-xapi
Version: 1.3.2-6
Severity: normal
After some time of rebooting and toolstack restart found very funny output in 'xe pif-lis':
xe pif-list params=currently-attached,device
device ( RO) : vif2.0
currently-attached ( RO): false
device ( RO) : vif211.0
currently-attached ( RO): false
device ( RO) : eth1
2012 Oct 24
1
Upload of fixes for xen-api
Dear release team,
I would like update the Wheezy package of xen-api with numerous small
fixes. These aren't RC bugs, but I believe they are all worth fixing. I
believe that the most important one to fix is #682202.
Here's the changelog:
* Fixes bashism in install-debian-pv.sh (Closes: #690612).
* Fixes bashism in interface-visualise (Closes: #690710).
* The /etc/init.d/xcp-squeezed
2013 Aug 30
1
Bug#721345: xcp-xapi: xl pci-attach is called by xapi in a PCI passthrough attempt. An error is raised due to the use of xapi and the PCI device cannot be attached to the VM.
Package: xcp-xapi
Version: 1.3.2-15
Severity: normal
I am trying to pass an SRIOV virtual function in a virtual machine but the attempt fails with the following errors shown in the xcp-xapi.log
[20130829T19:29:17.909Z|debug|sriov1|314 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi|VM.start R:9e8e10bd31bb|pciops] PCI devices from other-config:pci to attach: 0/0000:04:00.1
[20130829T19:29:18.012Z|debug|sriov1|314 UNIX
2012 May 29
3
Bug#675055: xcp-xapi: xe-edit-bootloader does not compatible with new /dev/sm
Package: xcp-xapi
Version: 1.3.2-6
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
/usr/lib/xcp/bin/xe-edit-bootloader failing with following message:
/usr/lib/xcp/bin/xe-edit-bootloader -u 19f66083-e776-70d1-1808-3712688ad138
Creating dom0 VBD: 0fdb952e-92ff-4b53-dd49-8d54b2268787
Plugging VBD:
Waiting for /dev/sm/backend/4c15ea03-5d70-938e-8265-d5424c0fda5e/963afb9a-9ceb-410f-8554-8be9fb70e7e0: . done
2015 Jun 08
2
Re: Recommended change for the networking page in wiki
On 06/08/2015 02:43 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
>> However, if I changed the destination address from "anywhere" to the
>> IP of the host machine, the problem resolved. So I change the script
>> to as follows. (Changes are highlighted. For some reason the original
>> script didn't work using /bin/sh, but it did with /bin/bash, so I
>> changed that too).
>
2006 Sep 04
2
Bug#379721: xen-3.0: FTBFS: bashisms
Patch attached.
Steve
--
--- Makefile-orig 2006-09-04 14:37:18.000000000 +0100
+++ Makefile 2006-09-04 14:37:34.000000000 +0100
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
.PHONY: ioemu ioemuinstall ioemuclean
ifndef XEN_NO_IOEMU
ioemu ioemuinstall ioemuclean:
- [ -f ioemu/config-host.h ] || \
+ ( test -f ioemu/config-host.h ) || \
(cd ioemu; ./configure --prefix=usr)
$(MAKE) -C
2004 May 28
2
Bug#251364: logcheck: preinst has bashism, fails with dash and LANG != C
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.20a
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
On a system where sh points to dash and LANG=es_ES, I get this:
# apt-get -y --reinstall install logcheck
Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0%
Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0%
Leyendo lista de paquetes... 23%
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0%
Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0%
Creando ?rbol de
2008 May 21
4
[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT
Hi,
I've been toying around with the testsuite for a bit, and after recompiling
llvm-gcc a bunch of times and fixing a nasty bashism bug, I actually got it to
run and pass most tests.
When running, I noticed a very long runtime on the lemon test. At first I
suspected an infinite loop, but it turned out the test simply needed around
1000 seconds to run. Some investigation turned out that the
2016 Apr 27
1
Bourne shell deprecated?
Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:27:26PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote:
>>
>> Some of the BSDs use to have a bourne shell and maybe some do, I don't
know.
>>
> Yup.
>
>> bash is mostly compatible with bourne (can run most bourne scripts)
which is why /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/bash on GNU and most other
*nix systems.
>
> Bash can run