similar to: Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.

[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bug tracking system (http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/) that require attention. All of these bugs are in the NEW or REOPENED state, and have not been touched in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at them, and decide on an initial action. Generally, this means one of three things: (1) You

[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bug tracking system (http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/) that require attention. All of these bugs are in the NEW or REOPENED state, and have not been touched in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at them, and decide on an initial action. Generally, this means one of three things: (1) You

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=715 Summary: nfq_nfnlh() and nfq_fd() should have const arguments Product: libnetfilter_queue Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: libnetfilter_queue AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=800 Summary: sk_buff.transport_header set incorrectly for NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING hook Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: netfilter hooks

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748 Summary: Range check for ulog-cprange is wrong Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy:

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752 Summary: ipq_read() will return an error (rc = -1) and the error message says "Received truncated message" Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P1

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com Resolution|

Hello all, My question: - - - - - - - Does anybody know when the reverse path filtering occurs as the packet traverses the kernel? Does it happen before NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING (PREROUTING) or not? Does it only happen at route selection time? What I have tried to do to find the answer: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I find a posting (from many years ago) [0], which suggests that this

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=963 Summary: nfq_udp_get_payload and nfq_udp_get_payload_len return wrong results Product: libnetfilter_queue Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: libnetfilter_queue

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 09:02 ------- This is a really hard

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743 Summary: Errors in compiling nfqnl_test.c Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: netfilter hooks AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=921 Summary: log, ulog and nflog: command-line parameters are not supported Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |2 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org

This question is not about linux usage. But still i think user list is a good crowd for linux programmer. So here it goes. I have this libnetfilter_queue application which receives packets from kernel based on some iptables rule. Before going straight to my problem, i'm giving a sample workable code and other tools to set up a test environment so that We problem definition and possible

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P1 |P2 CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com Severity|critical

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from Phil Oester

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777 Summary: Suspect bug in __do_replace() Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Hello I have a server with a dsl connection on eth1 and local interface eth0. Because of the NAT i cannot direct traffic to IMQ device in PREROUTING chain but have to use INPUT and FORWARD. So i use rules. iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0 iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0 And now the strange thing: FORWARD traffic gets directed nicely to the IMQ, but

Hi all, I''m having a hell of a time getting tc and IFBs to co-operate. I''ve copied the following from http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/IFB: -- export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: prio $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 parent 1:2 handle 20: tbf rate 20kbit buffer 1600 limit 3000 $TC qdisc add dev ifb0

Hello guys I don''t know if this thing has been posted before (if it was , please forgive me). I have 7 computers at home and I want all of them to have access to the internet. In order to do that , I set up a linux router (2 network cards) as a usual router (eth0 : 82.77.69.75 - internet connection ; eth1 : 192.168.10.1 - local network) . The other computers have ips ranging from