similar to: Write access for wiki howto "Nested virtualization on CentOS 6"

Hello, How do I set up the registers to find out that MEMLINUX is installed? I know it is an int 13h / ah=08h call - but I cannot figure out how to specify the other registers... Also, I need to find a way to be able to: unhook int 13h and int 15h and put them back to the BIOS vectors, and yes, I know some DOSses rehook int 13 - but it can be done.. I need to be able to boot a CD, load the

Hello all, I am new to Xen; I followed a few techtips/technotes from How2forge and other linux sites to walk me through configuring the following: - proper installation of xen kernel on a CentOS 5.1 server - booting into the xen kernel and checking the Dom0 (all is fine): [root at dataserv3 /]# xm list Name ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0

HI, In http://slint.fr/misc/MacBoot/ you'll find all context information. All files referenced here are stored there. Long story short: once dd-ed on an USB stick the ISO image can boot on a BIOS or EFI machine, but I want it to be able to boot on most x86_64 Macs with an EFI firmware. Unfortunately I get the error message: isohybrid: slint64-14.1.iso: unable to find mac efi image The

Hi, > Unfortunately I get the error message: > isohybrid: slint64-14.1.iso: unable to find mac efi image This is probably due to El Torito Platform id "Mac" in -eltorito-alt-boot -no-emul-boot -eltorito-platform Mac \ -eltorito-boot isolinux/macboot.img \ This caused in the image http://slint.fr/misc/MacBoot/slint64-14.1.iso platform id 1 with the third image. (I would

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7685 Summary: rsync should not set the creation data on the root folder of an HFS+ volume Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hey Scott, There has been quite a lot of research on capture tracking (aka escape analysis) for Java and other dynamic languages. See e.g.: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/HotSpot/EscapeAnalysis http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/vm/performance-enhancements-7.html http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=320384.320386 Nuno -----Original Message----- From: Scott Egerton via

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > (+CC LLVM dev - I'd dropped it in my original reply unintentionally and > just noticed.) > > On 06/07/2016 01:35 PM, Philip Reames wrote: > >> (This was written in a rush. There may be mistakes; if so I'll try to >> correct later.) >> >> At the

-- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hi, I have some questions about the CPU-Capabilities for Virtualization especially for Nested Virtualization like the Turtles Project. I am trying to create a Nested Environment by following the instruction of: http://kashyapc.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/nested-virtualization-with-kvm-and-amd/ The bare-metal system is a Dell Server with following CPU-Flags (virsh capabilities) <cpu>

On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:52:38 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: > Hi, some custom CPU models are reported from > virConnectGetDomainCapabilities as usable='yes' on a physical machine > while as usable='no' inside a VM running on the same machine. That's > not completely surprising. > > But what surprises me is that those models are still reported from >

Hi Team, I want to confirm if we support Nested Virtualization with AMD based processor as well ?

I'm not sure whether this is a specific CentOS question, but I'm hoping someone here can give me some pointers. I have an OpenStack compute node running CentOS 7.4.1708 and kernel 3.10.0-693.17.1.el7.x86_64 which is configured for nested virtualization; this has been set up for a few years and works fine when running CentOS 7 guests which themselves are using virt-create / virt-customize

-- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:29:08PM -0500, Digimer wrote: > Hi all, > > I got a new laptop recently and what worked before no longer works > (Fedora 23 on the laptops in both cases)... > > I'm trying to get nested virtualization to work because I use the VMs > on the laptop to simulate an HA cluster that itself hosts VMs. I don't > care much at all about the

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:45:12 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: > Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:52:38 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: > >> Hi, some custom CPU models are reported from > >> virConnectGetDomainCapabilities as usable='yes' on a physical machine > > > >> while as usable='no'

I am using nested virtualization on a Google Cloud Compute instance. Things are generally working fine with libvirt using qemu+kvm, however I observed that <cpu mode='host-model'> is not exposing avx and avx2 instruction set to the guest Linux instance. Google Cloud platform claims the CPU model of the host compute instance is Broadwell, however libvirt capabilities maps it to

Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> -- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list

Hi, some custom CPU models are reported from virConnectGetDomainCapabilities as usable='yes' on a physical machine while as usable='no' inside a VM running on the same machine. That's not completely surprising. But what surprises me is that those models are still reported from virConnectCompareCPU as supported (VIR_CPU_COMPARE_SUPERSET) in the nested environment and VMs can

Hi, I wonder if someone can provide pointers on what might be wrong with my setup. I'm running a kvm host Fedora23 with rawhide kernel on top of a skylake cpu - Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6260U CPU @ 1.80GHz (family: 0x6, model: 0x4e, stepping: 0x3) As part of an experiment, I have enabled Nested virt support on the host and created a fedora23 guest with virt-manager using host-passthrough as the

-- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com