similar to: Problem with IPSec tunnel, using IPv6 addresses, .........

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram] |<-----------------| host1 IPv6 address : fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe6f:dfa0 host2 IPv6 address :

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems, using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. I tried to establish the connection, but it has some problems which are explained below. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram]

Okay, so I''m trying to setup my multiple ISP setup that I described earlier. I have: # ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: em1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP>

My config is this: # Global parameters [global] # bind interfaces only = Yes # if this is turned on, always perfect # interfaces = lo 192.168.78.20 2001:470:1f1b:5b3:21b:21ff:fea6:ce93 # interfaces = lo 192.168.78.20 2001:470:1f1b:5b3:21b:21ff:fea6:ce93 192.168.81.20 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 # interfaces = lo 192.168.81.20 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 # if all interfaces

Hey! How are you? I have two interfaces (192.168.78.20 / *2001:470:1f1b:5b3:21b:21ff:fea6:ce93* and 192.168.81.20 / *2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92*) I have interfaces disabled i mean that i bind on everything on samba ac-dc... What here is what is weird, (via bind9 DLZ i am using it and is working), but on my clients i am getting some weird ipv6 addresses: patrikx3 at bitang:~$ ping

[Continuing a discussion from IRC so we have a permanent record] We want to shrink a disk image using virt-resize. Shrinking is harder and not really documented. It requires some manual calculations too. Here is the original: $ virt-df -a 209e6911-fe48-4321-900f-928b3400df88 Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use%

Why is someone not setting up an email server conform RFC's and seems to be you have an ipv6.. so set the ptr record. Hai Linda, I do have ipv4 and ipv6 on my server, and im never blocked.. but i did setup conform all rfcs.. i block servers in the same way. so yes, i did set my reverse for ipv4 and ipv6.. what most people do wrong.. 1) the hostname must have A and RR (PTR) and MX

Why would the samba list be looking for a reverse host name via IPV6? IFAIK I only have an IPv4 addr and reverse addr. I don't know if the original went to the person in france or not. Anyone else getting bounces like this? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 13:19:19 -0700 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem

I noticed that samba is listening on IPv6, so I became curious and wondered if I could actually use it, and so far, it looks like it isn't usable. Running nbtstat -A fe80::216:3eff:fe6f:1f3a on Windows returns the stupid message that the address must be in the a.b.c.d format. I then tried using nbtlookup from linux: nmblookup -S -U '[fe80::216:3eff:fe6f:1f3a]' \* 10.1.1.232

Hi Phil, NBT name resolution is IPv4 only. Samba does work over IPv6, but NetBIOS name resolution is and always will be IPv4 only. It is a feature of the protocol not Samba. Take a look at http://www.ipv6consultancy.com/ipv6blog/wp-content/uploads/sambaxp-2015-deploying-ipv6-only-samba-4-environments-v0_4.pdf and other presentations on the subject at

I have Apache/2.4.6 installed in a minimal CentOS 7 VM. I am trying to access the default page when Apache is installed by accessing the CentOS IP as http://192.168.3.130 (is a host only interface) but I got "This webpage is not available: ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT" and I can't find why. I have stopped iptables and then checked: # service iptables status Redirecting to /bin/systemctl

I was directed to the following site by one of our customers regarding a keyserver built into openssh. There's a patch for 3.4p1 on their site, but the license isn't very clear, nor is it clear if they have approached the openssh team regarding the inclusion of this subsystem into openssh proper. I've been asked to patch Mandrake's openssh with this feature, but I'm

Hi all, I'm trying to setup a cluster of 2 machines with Centos 5.2 to host a postfix+spamassassin+clamav+mailscanner service. Below cluster software versions rgmanager.i386 2.0.38-2.el5_2.1 installed cman.i386 2.0.84-2.el5_2.2 installed Every machine (hp blade server ) has 4 interfaces, bounded in this way: Eth0, eth1

Hello, I am trying to boot a VM in libvirt that has 2 interfaces. The first interface is connected to the default network and the second connects to a bridge interface on the host. When the VM boots the first interface doesn't receive an IP address from DHCP. It works when the VM only has one interface though. If I login to the VM using virsh console I noticed that in NetworkManager the

An observation and a question on the new version of OpenSSH. With previous version of OpenSSH, using something like pam_ldap to authenticate users against an LDAP directory worked great, however with 3.8p1 this is no longer the case. If I try to log into a machine with an account under "LDAP's control", I always get password failures. However, using an account with a ssh key

I'm curious as to whether or not there is a way to restrict forwarded ports server side. For instance, I'm running an IRC server and am allowing users to connect via ssh forwarding (so I can take advantange of using openssh's public key method for authentication). Each client I tell to setup their ~/.ssh/config in a certain way, but the relevant line is: LocalForward 6667

Hi all, I followed the guide "simple-bridging-with-dhcp", which has two parts: http://www.tinc-vpn.org/examples/simple-bridging-with-dhcp-server-side/ http://www.tinc-vpn.org/examples/simple-bridging-with-dhcp-client-side/ I have altered two things to fit my needs, 1) DHCP server(host:pek1) is on client side ethernet, so I have bridged eth0 and tun1 together; 2) Network/Server/Client

Troubleshooting steps fail. Trying to replace a standalone Netware server with a Samba4 server with AD. To isolate this test setup, changed server's static IP address and separated the wiring. Then went through the Troubleshooting portion of The Samba Checklist. Some tests pass. Some tests fail. I'm weak on Samba, DNS and AD. I appreciate your instructions on how to overcome the

Greetings routing folks, I want to use the netmask 255.255.255.255 to insulate (not quite isolate) machines on a shared subnet from each other. This works just fine on win XP, but Linux iproute will not acccept the gateway address in one step -- neither on the command line nor via DHCP: Here''s the interface, set up with a netmask of /32: # ip addr ... 2: eth0:

Trying to add a new samba 4 domain controller to an existing Windows 2003 domain. There are two existing domain controllers: dc1.home.aaronson.com and dc2.home.aaronson.com. As you can see below, samba 4 dies during the join. I am stumped. Dcdiag throws no errors on the existing controllers. Any ideas/ ubuntu at sulu:/usr/local/samba# sudo bin/samba-tool domain join home.aaronson.com