similar to: Centos 6 and VLAN-ID7 for vDSL (Telekom)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 So here is my problem: I'm unable to remove an interface on CentOS 5.4 (/etc/init.d/network restart keeps enabling it again) Background: The system had several interfaces set (eth0 eth0.6 eth0.7 eth0.8) 1.) I added a test interface...eth0.9 2.) but later deleted the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0.9 file (since i no longer needed it)

Hello guys, Sorry to bothering you. I had a small network with one ISP and firewall. eth1 -> Is connected to my ISP eth0 + eth0.1 , eth0.2 and etc are my local networks. All my network accesses internet via eth1. My routing table looks like the following : 213.194.242.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 10.123.20.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0

Hi, I am having problems establishing an adsl connection in dom0 (but ONLY in dom0, without xen everything is ok). Following is my setup/situation: 1. Installed clean Fedora 7 (with virtualization option selected) 2. Booted with the non-xen kernel & setup adsl. Adsl connection works without any problems. 3. Rebooted with xen kernel into dom0. 4. adsl connection can no longer be activated

Hello list, I''ve been using linux and open source software for over 5 years now and I want to give something back to the community. I''m working on a PHP-based project (SPITS). The aim of this project is to easly create a shaping script, using a web interface, without needing to know tc and iptables command line options. As the project is now in beta stage, soon a CSS

I was given the challenge recently of creating a LAN-LAN bridge between two buildings several hundred metres from each other, using only existing Cat 3 wiring and without having to resort to an expensive and finicky 5 Ghz wireless link. I was able to create a 90 megabit link for about $3,000 Cdn with new PC's, CentOS 4.1, and the newly avaliable Black Box VDSL Ethernet Extender, which

HI! I'm currently reviewing my (functional) setup with one physical ethernet interface eth1 of the host system being connected to a VDSL modem (not router!). A fully virtualized guest acts as router with this source mode: <source dev='eth1' mode='bridge'/> Reading the docs [1] I'm thinking whether mode='private' would be a better choice because the network

Running shorewall 3.0.6, Linux 2.6.16, iptables 1.3.0. This firewall has eth1 facing the DMZ and eth0 is a 802.1q trunk with 6 VLANs and zones on it. I would like to allow one subnet living out beyond the DMZ to have access to all zones on this firewall. It seemed that creating a zone would allow for this to be done cleanly via a line in the policy file. I defined this special subnet as the

I've just got Uverse installed. I had dsl, but ATT insisted I couldn't keep my old dsl, but had to switch to Uverse internet - vdsl. My setup: linux box as router : 10.10.11.252 asterisk box: 10.10.11.180 10.10.11.252 is multihomed and connected to the Uverse Residential Gateway. I've set it up as DMZplus, and it shows the public ip address as eth1. I can ssh into the

Hello, CentOS 8 dropped the rp-pppoe package. My attempts with NetworkManager-ppp already failed because it seems that it is not possible to use a VLAN as a device. Please, how does it work under C8 to set up a pppoe connection (German Telekom, VDSL (VLAN 7 required), ZTE modem). Thanks. Joe

Hi there, we are using tinc in switched mode for over a year now, currently with 18 clients which are connected 24 hours a day and many which aren't connected the whole day, also. If i'm reading the changes from 1.0.9 to 1.0.10 and 1.0.11 correctly, tinc should work now, although "TCPOnly = yes" isn't set in the config files of clients which are behind a NAT firewall, e.g. a

I'm having problem connecting to my isp with my sangoma s518. Everything seems to run smooth and wanrouter are training to connect....but forever.. Now, to test the connection i mounted up my standard nic and my old dsl router, to establish a standard basic pppoe connection..... and I can't with centos. I follow this standard setup:

Hi all, I have an issue with asterisk 13 and pjsip. I guess it is somehow Firewall related, but I'm unsure. A registration to Sipgate is established successfully: <Registration/ServerURI..............................> <Auth..........> <Status.......> ==========================================================================================

> I was given the challenge recently of creating a LAN-LAN bridge between > two > buildings several > hundred metres from each other, using only existing Cat 3 wiring and > without > having to resort > to an expensive and finicky 5 Ghz wireless link. I was able to create a 90 > megabit link for > about $3,000 Cdn with new PC's, CentOS 4.1, and the newly avaliable

yeah that's what came up before when I asked the list about this a couple months ago. The concensus was that in the case of a lightning strike or what have you the 24 awg copper would immediately fry and would not transmit too much of the current sustained. of course my neat little trick here would be fried all to hell, but... -----Original Message----- From: James Harper

Hi BKF, you can configure icecast to serve thousands of listeners but it's not going to happen on anything less then an industrial strength internet connection. If you have ADSL you can probably handle 5 listeners maybe 10 on an average service. If you have VDSL increase that to 15 maybe. If you have fibre it might do 25. It all depends on the service provided by your ISP and the

Bonjour, *Upload: 282.95 Mbit/s* is going to choke at about 5 listeners * * You need a streaming server provider. https://shoutca.st/ is an example but there are many. Don't buy 5k listeners buy 100 and see how it goes. *regards* *Robert* * * * * On 22/10/18 12:03 AM, Abdelkader BKF wrote: > Hi, > Thank you so much for your reply, > I've a dedicated server in OVH, where

Hi, Thank you so much for your reply, I've a dedicated server in OVH, where I have done speed test for the server : *bkf at xxxxx ~> speedtest-cli Retrieving speedtest.net <http://speedtest.net> configuration...Retrieving speedtest.net <http://speedtest.net> server list...Testing from OVH SAS (x.x.x.x)...Selecting best server based on latency...Hosted by fdcservers.net

Servus Philipp, Unfortunately the traceroute(6) results are both more or less random. Sometimes traceroute "hangs" a while, wherever, sometimes traceroute6. Sometimes traceroute is faster, sometimes traceroute6. Not reliable. Your MTU question, tried as adviced: Maximum size for IPv4 is 1466, and max size for IPv6 is 1444. Exceeding these values leads to a "ping: local error:

Hi all, after a half day searching for an error, sniffing and upgrading to the newest shorewall version I give up and the problem to you. I have following configuration in my /etc/shorewall/masq: #INTERFACE SOURCE ADDRESS vlan7::10.231.0.0/16 192.168.222.0/24 10.231.113.30 vlan7 192.168.222.0/24 10.1.0.38 Towards a

Dear List, I have been trying to extract associations from a matrix whereby individual locations are within a certain distance threshold from one another. I have been able to extract those individuals where there is 'no interaction' (i.e. where these individuals are not within a specified distance threshold from another individual) and give these individuals a unique Group ID containing