similar to: NFS resources, how to check version

Hello, I've got a little problem with NFSv4 + Kerberos. I can do a mount with Kerberos with a valid ticket, but read-only. After the mount -vvv -t nfs -o nfsv4,sec=krb5 nfsserver:/ /mount_test/ I can see: #klist: Feb 6 07:22:47 Feb 6 17:22:43 nfs/nfsserver at my.domain #/var/heimdal/kdc.log: 2013-02-06T07:28:26 TGS-REQ clientnfs at my.domain from IPv4:192.168.0.23 for nfs/nfsserver at

I was used to integrate some linux client in my samba network mounting homes with 'unix extensions = yes', and works as expected, at least with some old lubuntu derivatives. Client side i use 'pam_mount'. Now i'm working on a ubuntu mate derivative, and i've not found a way to start the session properly in CIFS. If i create a plain local home (pam_mkhome), session start as

Hi Louis, Thanks for your message. However, I already have NFS working completely. I'm only trying to work out root NFS access on the client.? I tried your NFS translation fix via idmapd.conf? but that isn't working for me. I've discovered that's because CentOS 7 is using gssproxy so apparently your fix won't work. The fix from Red Hat (adding some lines to krb.conf seen in my

Hi everyone, I have a samba DC, let's call it dc1.ad.example.com. I have two members of the domain - server1.ad.example.com and server2.ad.example.com.?? They are not running smbd and winbind. Instead, they are running SSSD with AD backend. I want to create an NFSv4 export on server1.ad.example.com and mount it on server2.ad.example.com (say, sec=krb5). I found some instructions online

Thank you for that, i did have a good look at that one. And i use Debian 9, if you test what i posted below in the thread, you will see NFSv4 works fine. Below is missing one more thing, the "allow to delegate (kerberos only) " on the computer object in the AD, should be enabled. And yes, i've see bugchecks also but only on my debian .. Lenny.. Stt.. ;-) .. Its my last lenny

Hai Jason, Hmm, yes, well, only one thing i can think of now is And thats the last one.. Is the server allowed to delelagate kerberos services? If you have set that also? It's the last thing i can remember. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Jason Keltz via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 november

Hi, Thank you for replying. User home directory creation is working without the need to edit /etc/pam.d/common-session The logon script I mentioned here is a in-house script to handle directory mounting for file server access, and create shortcut on the account desktop for different logins. On my Linux machines, currently all is done manually by local user account creation and by adding the

Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > Hai, > > > > > In short. My network design previously work with Debian Stretch > > Servers and clients and some Windows clients (not many). > > > > Debian Stretch use Samba 4.5.16 so there is no unix_primary_group > > option for the clients. So I have

Thanks Luc, First, can I just use the small /etc/krb5.conf suggested in Samba AD docs or do I need something more substantial on the server & client for Kerberos NFS to work? [libdefaults]         default_realm = SUBDOMAIN.DOMAIN.COM         dns_lookup_realm = false         dns_lookup_kdc = true I understand a /etc/krb5.keytab file has to be created on both server & client. Most

I just upgraded to 0.22.0 from 0.18.4 and I''m running into what I think are problems due to changes in scope rules. In my site.pp manifest, I have the following: import "classes/*" node nfsserver { include nfsserver } node webserver { include webserver } class cluster1_sites { website { "example.com": ...; "example2.com": ...; } } node

Hello, we are using ctdb 4.15.5 on RHEL8 (Kernel 4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64) to provide NFS v3 (via tcp) to RHEL7/8 clients. Whenever an ip takeover happens most clients report something like this: [Mon Feb 13 12:21:22 2023] nfs: server x.x.253.252 not responding, still trying [Mon Feb 13 12:21:28 2023] nfs: server x.x.253.252 not responding, still trying [Mon Feb 13 12:22:31 2023] nfs: server

On 20/08/2019 11:16, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote >> The problem with that is, 'id' gets its info from the same place that >> 'getent' does, so the OP will still get the wrong group ;-) >> >> Rowland > Maybe i did not understand the question then. > In: id username |awk -F"=" '{ print $2 }'|cut -d"(" -f1 > $2 = GID

Hello, I have a CentOS 5.2 server that exports /home on the local network for 2 users by secure nfs4 with kerberos krb5p. The clients are a notebook and a desktop pc. The following error is always reproducible on all clients. If running the clients on high load, that means for example 5 firefox windows open and connected with www pages from the internet, installing the new qt development

Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 14:34, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On 21/08/2019 09:04, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > > Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H. van Belle via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > >> Hai, > >> > >>> In short. My network design previously work with Debian Stretch >

Hi, I’m having difficulties trying to understand the performance differences between NFS and SMB. I have used rsync (OS X) over SMB (mounted network storage) and using rsync (OS X) over SSH (NFS mounted storage) From my test, rsync over SMB builds a file list each time comparing modified source/destination, where as rsync over ssh/nfs is incredibly quicker, pretty much instant. During the

Hi, I noticed that my 4.8R box seems to have a NFS problem. I use a FreeBSD/i386 4.8R box as a NFS server, and a FreeBSD/i386 5-CURRENT (as of today) as the NFS client. On the client, /a (on the server) can be mounted successfully with -o rw,bg,intr,mntudp options. However, when a large amount of write operations such as "cp -r /home/ncvs /a" are performed on the client, the

I get the above panic after nfs clients attach to this nfs server and being read/write ops on it after an unclean shutdown. I've fsck'ed the fs, and it marks it as clean, but I get this every time. It's an NFS share of a GEOM stripe (about 2TB). mode = 0100600, inum = 58456203, fs = /mnt panic: ffs_valloc: dup alloc I do have dumps from two crashes so far. This is

Hai, I'm getting somewhere, here you go, a snap of what i have atm. And what works atm. Im asuming you have winbind already running. Obligated is A+PTR record in the DNS. You can turn or the rdns check in krb5.conf but i did not test that. # Tested on Debian Stretch - NFSv4 SERVER apt-get install --auto-remove nfs-kernel-server systemctl stop nfs-* Added in krb5.conf below the

Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 17:04, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > On 21/08/2019 15:14, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > > Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 14:34, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > > a ?crit : > > > >> On 21/08/2019 09:04, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > >>> Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H.

Hai, Hmm.. Bummer.. I just discovered the debian package dont have the vfs_nfs4acl include in the build. And because of that it's not in my packages. I'll have a look into it, see what i can make of it. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > L.P.H. van Belle via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 9