Mike Tancsa wrote:> At 04:48 PM 13/03/2006, Eric Anderson wrote:
>> I get the above panic after nfs clients attach to this nfs server and
>> being
>> I do have dumps from two crashes so far.
>> This is FreeBSD-6.1-PRERELEASE from Friday-ish.
>
> Dont know if it was fixed or not, but there were a lot of VM changes
> committed last night that might help.
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-March/023526.html
I just updated, and it still happens. More information for those
interested:
mode = 0100600, inum = 58456203, fs = /mnt
panic: ffs_valloc: dup alloc
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
165 __asm __volatile("movl %%fs:0,%0" : "=r"
(td));
(kgdb) backtrace
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
#1 0xc064482f in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:399
#2 0xc0644b55 in panic (fmt=0xc0890967 "ffs_valloc: dup alloc") at
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:555
#3 0xc077ee3c in ffs_valloc (pvp=0xc8eab440, mode=33152, cred=0xc8a91d80,
vpp=0xe83a5824) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c:945
#4 0xc07a5933 in ufs_makeinode (mode=33152, dvp=0xc8eab440, vpp=0xe83a5acc,
cnp=0xe83a5ae0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c:2165
#5 0xc07a2b0d in ufs_create (ap=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c:171
#6 0xc082dc98 in VOP_CREATE_APV (vop=0x0, a=0xe83a5a18) at vnode_if.c:204
#7 0xc0737590 in nfsrv_create (nfsd=0xc8a91d00, slp=0xc8816700, td=0xc7d99780,
mrq=0xe83a5c98) at vnode_if.h:111
#8 0xc0744e95 in nfssvc_nfsd (td=0x0) at
/usr/src/sys/nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c:472
#9 0xc0744688 in nfssvc (td=0xc7d99780, uap=0xe83a5d04) at
/usr/src/sys/nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c:181
#10 0xc081cd7f in syscall (frame {tf_fs = 59, tf_es = 59, tf_ds = 59,
tf_edi = 1, tf_esi = 0, tf_ebp = -1077941448, tf_isp = -398828188, tf_ebx = 4,
tf_edx = 672385208, tf_ecx = 25, tf_eax = 155, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2,
tf_eip = 671840155, tf_cs = 51, tf_eflags = 662, tf_esp = -1077941476, tf_ss =
59}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:981
#11 0xc0809e8f in Xint0x80_syscall () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:200
#12 0x00000033 in ?? ()
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(kgdb)
Maybe that helps somebody?
Should I sent this to -current instead, since it appears this would
happen under -current also, and possibly there is a larger base of
people watching the list?
Thanks!
Eric
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------