similar to: Intel 82574 issue reported on Slashdot

Sorry for the repost... I don't think the first one posted.. posted to freebsd.stable, freebsd-current, Freebsd-hardware I checked the hardware in the online documentation manual/hardware It only lists the bits and peices of the machine say the hard drive controller and so forth. but doesn't give you a particular system to look at as a working machine with FreeBSD 6.2 does anybody

Does the 6.1-BETA4-i386-disc2.iso contain only usr/share/doc, or for some reason i am unable to see anything else? I was looking for usr/src (and for a odd chance to have usr/ports); i suppose those two trees would be available somewhere on some disc for RELENG_6_1. I mounted the image as ... mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /path/to/6.1-BETA4-i386-disc2.iso -u 0 mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /mnt ...

Hello everyone, I am trying to tweak some of the sysctl tunables for the ix (ixgbe) driver in FreeBSD 9.2 since I am experiencing less than ideal performance and it seems like I can't find any: # sysctl -a | grep -i ixgbe device ixgbe I am running 9.2-RC4. Any input appreciated. Thanks, -- Rumen Telbizov Unix Systems Administrator <http://telbizov.com>

While not strictly Asterisk related this issue could certainly affect some of you: http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html -- Kristian Kielhofner

my ports database seems to have become broken. I'm running -stable, but haven't rebuilt the system in a year or so (I know, security vulerabilities, but the box has been shelved in this time). anyhow, at this point, I can't do even a make clean in ports, or build portupgrade. I fetched portupgrade with pkg_add hoping that running pkgdb -F would sort things out, but it errors with: **

Hi, I noticed that network connection of one of my boxes got significantly slow just after upgrading it to 8.0R. The box has an em0 (82547EI) and worked fine with 7.2R. The symptoms are: - A ping to a host on the same LAN takes 990ms RTT, it reduces gradually to around 1ms, and then it returns to around 1s. The rate was about 2ms/ping. - The response is quite slow, but no packet

Part 2 of my Rails article on ONLamp.com just made the slashdot front page! The entry, itself, is here: http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/04/1319242&tid=156 Curt

Ask Slashdot: Is Ruby on Rails Maintainable? Posted by Cliff on Wednesday December 21, @12:51PM from the would-you-want-to-edit-the-code-later dept. kale77in asks: "I''ve become a big fan of Ruby over the past few months, but I''m not at all sure about Ruby On Rails. Automatic code generation sets of alarm bells in my mind; so that, to RoR''s promise of

Hey, http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/13/1343236&mode=thread If anyone's interested. -- / Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller@infidyne.com>' Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey@scode.org E-Mail: peter.schuller@infidyne.com Web: http://www.scode.org --- >8 ---- List archives:

Greetings all, Just a quick heads up that there is a Slashdot thread this morning on Open Source Math Software for Education, which includes references to R and Dirk's Quantian distribution (among others). The thread is at: http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/04/12/13/2355258.shtml?tid=185&tid=4 The OP's query was targeted for high school to first year college age students, but as

In case you missed it, RC2 is on slashdot.org too: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/08/13/1811241 BTW Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote on /. that RC3 should appear very soon (in a week or so)? Also, it looks like Wall Street Journal article is not available on-line (at least to non-registered persons). If someone is registered or have a paper edition, please post this article somewhere so that we

Hey all. Just in case someone here doesn't read Slashdot on a daily (OK, hourly, backoff! 8-) ) basis, here's a new interview with Chris Montgomery (I can only assume that it's you, Monty? I thought you were like Sting, or Madona! 8-) ) http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/08/14/1034209 Good interview, and more converts to the collective! 8-) OH, and just to update everyone,

Hey all. Just in case someone here doesn't read Slashdot on a daily (OK, hourly, backoff! 8-) ) basis, here's a new interview with Chris Montgomery (I can only assume that it's you, Monty? I thought you were like Sting, or Madona! 8-) ) http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/08/14/1034209 Good interview, and more converts to the collective! 8-) OH, and just to update everyone,

We have an article right now on the Slashdot main page: http://slashdot.org/news/08/11/04/136220.shtml -- Lino Mastrodomenico

Just in case anyone missed it. Ugh. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/13/1343236&mode=nested --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages

We have an article right now on the Slashdot main page: http://slashdot.org/news/08/11/04/136220.shtml -- Lino Mastrodomenico

I may not agree with everything they say, such as ISPConfig (I prefer webmin) but this tutorial offers a "step by step opportunity for newbies". Does this indicate that CentOS is now a "mainstream" distro? (Technically speaking its not CentOS 4.3 but CentOS 4 Update 3 but we are not into semantics). Article on Slash :- http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/06/05/01/1049254.shtml

Sorry if it wraps: http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/16/1758249&tid=109&tid=163&ti d=110&tid=98&tid=218 Enjoy!

From: Nigel Kendrick <support-lists at petdoctors.co.uk> > Sorry if it wraps: > http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/16/1758249&tid=109&tid=163&tid=110&tid=98&tid=218 This has _nothing_ to do with Microsoft possibly buying Red Hat. People who even suggest this only expose their *0* understanding of business. Microsoft has an alliance with Sun. Why?

We can't do that until we provide a reasonable way for SMB1 clients to connect, probably via a SMB1 -> SMB2 proxy based on the NTVFS file server (where we had such a prototype until very recently). It won't be perfect SMB1, but needs to be enough for basic operation. I'm quite convinced Samba and SMB1 are critical infrastructure in many places and while we may dislike SMB1 for