Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "GSS-SPNEGO with dovecot and Outlook without Samba"
2008 Aug 12
5
[PATCH] Support GSS-SPNEGO natively
I cooked this up while trying to figure out why thunderbird on Windows
w/ SSPI was not working, but it turned out thunderbird does not use
it, so I haven't been able to test it yet. I'm presenting it for
discussion only, unless someone else can try it :)
Modern versions of MIT kerberos support GSS-SPNEGO natively, but are
only willing to negotiate for kerberos tickets and not NTLM
2015 Apr 16
2
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
On 16 Apr 2015 14:29, "Johnny Hughes" <johnny at centos.org> wrote:
>
> On 04/16/2015 06:33 AM, Mike wrote:
> > Hi Johnny,
> >
> > Thank you for your response. I thought to choose the sernet package
> > because of the following stated in Samba Readme:
> >
> > Samba packages shipped in some distributions like e. g. Fedora, RHEL may
>
2015 Apr 16
0
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:03 PM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com>
wrote:
> This was required for kerberos secured updates prior to el7.1 and el6.6 ...
>
> The problem in the underlying kerberos libraries was resolved so that
> kerberos based updates worked with gss again and spnego doesn't need to be
> compiled in.
>
2015 Apr 16
0
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
On 04/16/2015 06:33 AM, Mike wrote:
> Hi Johnny,
>
> Thank you for your response. I thought to choose the sernet package
> because of the following stated in Samba Readme:
>
> Samba packages shipped in some distributions like e. g. Fedora, RHEL may
> not be able to be used as Samba AD DC, because the distribution relies on
> MIT Kerberos which isn't supported by
2015 Apr 16
3
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
Hi Johnny,
Thank you for your response. I thought to choose the sernet package
because of the following stated in Samba Readme:
Samba packages shipped in some distributions like e. g. Fedora, RHEL may
not be able to be used as Samba AD DC, because the distribution relies on
MIT Kerberos which isn't supported by Samba yet. In this case build Samba
yourself or use the packages from SerNet or
2017 Oct 24
2
Outlook 2016 SSO with GSSAPI auth?
Hi folks,
I've been sifting through various threads on GSSAPI and NTLM support,
and I'm wondering if anyone out there can confirm or deny GSSAPI IMAP
auth support in Microsoft Outlook 2016 (Windows)? Perhaps there's some
magic registry key to change IMAP auth from PLAIN to GSSAPI?
We're trying to do single sign-on + e-mail for Windows domain users;
Thunderbird GSSAPI works
2007 Apr 05
1
GSS/Kerb5, Solaris 10, how to build?
Gang,
I've been trying to build rc29 under Solaris 10 using either
"--with-gssapi" or Kerberos 5 ticket usage. I'm trying to figure
out how to set up fetchmail on another S10 box to do IMAP fetches
from dovecot without having to enter a password.
No matter what configure option I try, I get
Building with GSSAPI support ........ : no
at the end of the configure. I searched
2014 Dec 18
0
Samba 4 with squid3 (--helper-protocol=gss-spnego )
Hai,
?
Im know this might not be the place to ask, but im doing it anyway..? ;-)
?
Im testing an debian Jessie server with squid3 ( 3.4.8 )
Its running Debian Samba 4.1.13 with winbind.
?
Im having troubles, to get the squid auth working.
So my question is is someone here using kerberos authentication on squid. ( 3.4.x )
Or someone who is using the gss-spnego helper protocol.
?
Im using this
2010 Sep 19
1
Suppressing the GSS-API SPNEGO negTokenInit message on Negotiate Protocol Response
Dear SAMBA experts,
I'm looking to emulate the behavior of some older Windows servers, mainly
old Win2k/XP machines.
On newer clients (possibly XP-SP2 and above), the SMB server will send a
GSS-API message at the end of the Negotiate Protocol Response packet
detailing the supported Security Service Providers by OIDs in a negTokenInit
structure. However, older servers did not send this message
2015 Apr 16
0
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
On 04/16/2015 12:53 AM, Mike wrote:
> CentOS 7.1503 installed.
> Installed Samba 4 from sernet: Version 4.1.17-SerNet-RedHat-11.el7 (to be
> configured).
>
> The samba wiki Readme First page states, "Some distributions like . . . Red
> Hat Enterprise Linux (and clones), ship BIND9 packages with disabled
> GSS-SPNEGO option, which is required for signed DNS updates when
2015 Apr 17
2
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
On 17 Apr 2015 00:42, "Mike" <1100100 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:03 PM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This was required for kerberos secured updates prior to el7.1 and el6.6
...
> >
> > The problem in the underlying kerberos libraries was resolved so that
> > kerberos based updates worked
2015 Apr 16
2
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
CentOS 7.1503 installed.
Installed Samba 4 from sernet: Version 4.1.17-SerNet-RedHat-11.el7 (to be
configured).
The samba wiki Readme First page states, "Some distributions like . . . Red
Hat Enterprise Linux (and clones), ship BIND9 packages with disabled
GSS-SPNEGO option, which is required for signed DNS updates when using BIND
as DNS backend on your Samba DC. This circumstance requires
2015 Apr 17
0
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:46 AM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com>
wrote:
> It wasn't the bind package directly but rather an issue with the libkrb5
> libraries.
>
> This is the specific bug that fixed the issue:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087068
>
> I'll get the samba wiki updated to make this clear.
>
Zoinks! I
2015 Apr 17
1
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
On 17 Apr 2015 13:04, "Mike" <1100100 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:46 AM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It wasn't the bind package directly but rather an issue with the libkrb5
> > libraries.
> >
> > This is the specific bug that fixed the issue:
> >
> >
2024 Aug 30
1
Debian openssh option review: considering splitting out GSS-API key exchange
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:30:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> * for Debian trixie (current testing):
>
> * add dependency-only packages called something like
> openssh-client-gsskex and openssh-server-gsskex, depending on their
> non-gsskex alternatives
> * add NEWS.Debian entry saying that people need to install these
> packages if they want to retain
2018 Jan 07
1
Dynamic DNS Update Error GSS failure
Hi @ all,
I try to update the DNS records from my DHCP Clients to my AD DC but there
ist an issue with the GSSAPI I don't know how to solve.
For this I followed this guide.
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_B
IND9
GSSAPI Error:
start_gssrequest
tkey query failed: GSSAPI error: Major = Unspecified GSS failure. Minor
code may provide more
2007 Mar 08
1
Coredump in dovecot-auth on gss auth
I've enabled the GSS code in dovecot, but our Kerberos nerds
are complaining that it doesn't work :) I probably have the
thing totally misconfigured (so don't worry about that part for
now), but I do have a crash:
Info: imap-login: Disconnected: rip=XXX.YYY.229.8, lip= XXX.YYY.17.59, TLS handshake
Error: auth(default): gssapi(?,XXX.YYY.229.8): While acquiring service credentials: No
2009 Jun 16
1
Sasl error: SASL(-1): generic failure: GSSAPI Error: Unspecified GSS failure.
Hello
I have error during connection from managed host to ovirt server.
Jun 16 12:31:24 main qpidd[27662]: 2009-jun-16 12:31:24 warning Client
closed connection with 501: internal-error: Sasl error: SASL(-1):
generic failure: GSSAPI Error: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may
provide more information (No credentials cache found)
(qpid/client/SaslFactory.cpp:226)
I read on this maillist
2003 Aug 22
1
gss userauth (fwd)
what about this? can we do about this if
we break the protocol?
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Love <lha at stacken.kth.se>
Subject: gss userauth
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:06:27 +0200
Size: 2878
Url: http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20030822/f7bb85a0/attachment.mht
2024 Apr 02
2
Debian openssh option review: considering splitting out GSS-API key exchange
[I've CCed openssh-unix-dev for awareness, but set Mail-Followup-To to
just debian-devel and debian-ssh to avoid potentially spamming them with
a long discussion. If you choose to override this then that's your
call, but please be mindful of upstream's time.]
Following the xz-utils backdoor, I'm reconsidering some choices in
Debian's OpenSSH packaging. Please note that