Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "chkrootkit 0.46 reboots FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8"
2007 Nov 20
2
chkrootkit V. 0.47
Running freeBSD 6.1
After changing chkrootkit to the latest version V. 0.47 and compiling it then
running it I get the following:
==================<SNIPPIT>================
Searching for anomalies in shell history files... nothing found
Checking `asp'... not infected
Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 6667)
Checking `lkm'... You have 131 process hidden for readdir
2006 Dec 22
1
chkrootkit reporting possible LKM trojan
How can I be sure if it is LKM or not?
Today I've run chkrootkit and it gave me:
Checking `lkm'... You have 179 process hidden for readdir command
You have 179 process hidden for ps command
chkproc: Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
Checking `chkutmp'... The tty of the following user process(es) were not found
in /var/run/utmp !
! RUID PID TTY CMD
! root
2003 Aug 24
2
[solution] chkrootkit reports infected files
Hey all,
I've submitted a fix for chkrootkit port, to solve the
false positives on FreeBSD 5 and higher:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=55919
The topic, btw, should be "Teach security/chkrootkit
about FreeBSD 5", but it's not my first typo today.
Maintainer, please approve.
Authors, please see if you can include the changes.
I also fixed a minor bug in chk_vdir.
2003 Oct 01
3
chkrootkit 0.42 & 4.7-REL... "[: -ne: argument expected".... huh?
Good morning all;
Whils't running chkrootkit 0.42 on one of my 4.7-REL boxen it reported :
<snip>
Checking 'biff'...not infected
]: not found
[: -ne: argument expected
Checking 'chfn'...not infected
]: not found
[: -ne: argument expected
<snip>
I've been unable to locate any information ref. the " ]: not found " and "
[: -ne: argument
2004 May 01
3
chkrootkit and 4.10-prerelease issues?
Has anyone else seen chkrootkit (version 0.43) on 4.10-prerelease or
later report chfn, chsh, and date as infected?
I built world yesterday, and my nightly chkrootkit reports this on run.
I've replaced the binaries with their 4.9 equivalents, and things don't
report as infected. I upgrade the 4.9 machine to 4.10, and chkrootkit
reports them as infected again.
Is this similar to the
2004 Aug 18
4
chfn, date, chsh INFECTED according to chkrootkit
I ran chkrootkit ( v. chkrootkit-0.43 ) earlier and
noticed that chfn, date, and chsh showed as being
infected. I remember reading post from the past that
right now chkrootkit is giving alot of false
positives, so I suspected that these 3 binaries are
not bad.
However, to be on the safe side, I deleted the 3
binaries, removed /usr/src and did a 'make world' to
4.10-STABLE.
But, chfn,
2003 Aug 14
2
chkrootkit reports INFECTED :(
Hi!
Running chkrootkit on newly installed FreeBSD 5.0 got:
-cut-
Checking `basename'... not infected
Checking `biff'... not infected
Checking `chfn'... INFECTED
Checking `chsh'... INFECTED
Checking `cron'... not infected
Checking `date'... INFECTED
-cut-
Checking `ls'... INFECTED
-cut-
Checking `ps'... INFECTED
Checking `pstree'... not found
-cut-
What does it
2003 Aug 24
2
weird problem with chkrootkit and checksums
Hello,
last night, my chkrootkit crontab returned an alarm message :
> Checking `lkm'... You have 1 process hidden for readdir command
> You have 2 process hidden for ps command
> Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
Some research on google make me think it's probably a false positive. I
tried few things :
re-launching chkrootkit : "Checking `lkm'...
2004 May 21
12
Hacked or not ?
Hi,
I have a 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD box apparently hacked!
Yesterday I ran chkrootkit-0.41 and I don't like some of the outputs.
Those are:
chfn ... INFECTED
chsh ... INFECTED
date ... INFECTED
ls ... INFECTED
ps ... INFECTED
But all the rest is NOT PROMISC, NOT INFECTED, NOTHING FOUND, NOTHING DELETED, or NOTHING DETECTED.
I know by the FreeBSD-Security archives that
1998 Jul 16
0
".." not displayed with p8
Hello ,
I have installed the 1.9.18p8 release on my HP9000 ( HP-UX 10.20 )
. I use the same smb.conf than with the p2 release . I have now a
problem with the Windows 3.11 clients : In the subdirectories of each
share, I can't display the " .. " root directory . Is it a known bug
or just an error in my smb.conf ?
Thanks for your help.
JF
2014 Aug 22
7
[Bug 2263] New: sshd privsep monitor process doesn't handle SIGXFSZ signal
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2263
Bug ID: 2263
Summary: sshd privsep monitor process doesn't handle SIGXFSZ
signal
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.6p1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
1998 Aug 06
0
Samba 1.9.18p7-2 PDC & netlogon? or p8? or wait?
I have a linux system running Samba 1.9.18p7-2 smoothly right now, with
perhaps 600 users. I have an NT box with 2 users, for a dedicated
application, which is a PDC right now. I have ~300 Win95 client machines
that I want to have do a domain login, authenticating off the samba box
(running RedHat 5.1, btw) so that I don't have to replicate users onto the
NT box when all they really need to
1999 Jan 05
1
Compiling 1.9.18p10 or p8 on SCO OSR5.0.4
Hi, I am wondering if anyone can help me with a problem I am having when compiling samba. When
I issue the "make" command the compilation of the binaries aborts with the following message.
"replace.c", line 195: error: identifier redeclared: initgroups
*** Error code 1 (bu21)
If I comment out the section of code in "replace.c" that declares initgroups and
1998 Jul 21
3
Can't display ".." with the p8 release
Hello,
I ask this question last week but I got no response :
I have installed the 1.9.18p8 release on my HP9000 ( HP-UX
10.20 ). I use the same smb.conf than with the p2 release . I have now
a problem with the Windows 3.11 clients : In the subdirectories of
each share, I can't display the " .. " root directory ( but it works
). Is it a bug
2006 Feb 21
1
OT Proftpd Continued
Below is a cut and past from my log files that are sent to me. This is
from the last day that proftpd worked correctly. I'm not sure why
proftpd was restarted as the log states:
################### LogWatch 5.2.2 (06/23/04) ####################
Processing Initiated: Sun Feb 19 09:02:02 2006
Date Range Processed: yesterday
Detail Level of Output: 0
Logfiles
2003 Nov 12
1
really clean install?
Good evening, I was finish the FreeBSD4.9 installation from CD, and only do some edit with the /etc/rc.firewall, /etc/rc.conf, /boot/defaults/loader.conf, and recompiling the kernel to support my ext2 backup harddisk, with sndcard support too.
This's a old laptop (ibm380z), i have chkrootkit warning after all finished, i attached my uname -a, dmesg, pkg_info and chkrootkit result, please
2003 Mar 28
0
FW: who to copy a registry file between users?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Shaffer
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:41 AM
To: 'Ricardo Cordeiro'
Subject: RE: [Samba] who to copy a registry file between users?
I think the only way to accomplish this correctly is to copy the user
profile to the Default User profile. Then, delete all of the profiles on
each machine and on the servers and have them rebuilt when the users log
2003 Apr 13
1
chfn, chsh, ls, ps - INFECTED
My machine got hacked a few days ago through the samba bug. I
reinstalled everything cvsuped src-all, and ran chkrootkit. No more LKM
but still...
Can anyone please advise ?
bash-2.05b# chkrootkit | grep INFECTED
Checking `chfn'... INFECTED
Checking `chsh'... INFECTED
Checking `date'... INFECTED
Checking `ls'... INFECTED
Checking `ps'... INFECTED
--
Jay
-------------- next
2010 Aug 25
0
[LLVMdev] Register allocation marking spills (Re: NumLoads/NumStores for linearscan?)
On 25 Aug 2010, at 02:04, Silvio Ricardo Cordeiro wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Silvio Ricardo Cordeiro wrote:
>
> > Is there a way for me to collect statistics about the number of loads/stores added by the "linearscan" register allocator (just like can be done with
2010 Aug 24
2
[LLVMdev] NumLoads/NumStores for linearscan?
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Silvio Ricardo Cordeiro wrote:
>
> > Is there a way for me to collect statistics about the number of
> loads/stores added by the "linearscan" register allocator (just like can be
> done with the "local" allocator)? I still haven't