similar to: SPF1 txt records

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, While I've seen this referred to a lot of places, I haven't yet found a posted solution that works for me. Testing has been done from a Mac running OSX 10.5.8 Here's what I have so far: if anyone can give me a next step to test, I'd appreciate it. If anyone can give me a complete solution, I'd appreciate it even

I am inquiring about how to setup a proper SPF record. I know there are SPF wizards/generators available but each seem to have a different "opinion" of what should be included and what should not be included. Let me give you a scenario of my setup, and hopefully someone can help me out. My domain is: test.com My mailserver hostname is: mail.host.com which also has a MATCHING PTR

Your spf record is broken: dovecot.org. 39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all" -- Jim Flowers <jflowers at ezo.net> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

This caused a crash on a 2.6.10-1.12_FC2smp kernel May 19 09:56:35 spf1 kernel: Assertion failure in log_do_checkpoint() at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:361: "drop_count != 0 || cleanup_ret != 0" May 19 09:56:35 spf1 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ May 19 09:56:37 spf1 kernel: kernel BUG at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:361! May 19 09:56:37 spf1 kernel: invalid operand: 0000 [#1] May 19

Hello Everyone, I am used to messing with bind zones directly. With samba 4, I cannot do that. Is the following the correct way to add a TXT record for SPF to the zone using samba-tool? /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dns add s4server.example.org example.org example.org TXT "v=spf1 mx -all" I am not sure it is because it is showing up with dig as "v=spf1" "mx"

I have a DNS server which is not returning mx queries for some reason? The zone file is as follows: $TTL 1H @ IN SOA example.com. root.example.com. ( 1 ; serial# 3H ; refresh 1H ; retry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Over the past weekend, I added SPF screening on the MTA at shorewall.net. SPF is a mechanism for a domain to use DNS to publish a list of those IP addresses that are used to send legitimate email from that domain. A receiving MTA can use that published information to determine if email from a domain is being sent through an MTA belonging to that

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: >> > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: >> > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] >> > >> > For some

Thank you everyone for your help. I corrected my resolv.conf files as Peter Milesson suggested and then had to take a number of extra steps so now things are looking a little better. In case it helps anyone else in the future, here's what I found (plus I am now having problems resolving internal addresses). As far as I can see, the setup on both servers is identical (except they use their own

> > > > OK, you are using the winbind 'rid' backend, so it is okay to use > 'Domain Admins', so start again and follow that wikipage: > > Ensure you have the 'acl' & 'attr' packages installed (this is what they > are called on Debian based distros) > They are installed. I built the server using the walk through you gave me. >

Hello, I'm trying to implement domainkeys and dkim on my domain and then to get it set up with postfix. Currently i'm having difficulty with the first stage, adding the domainkey txt record to bind, is a special version of bind required to do this? The machine that handles dns is using bind 9.5.1-p3. Thanks. Dave.

I am investigating whether dovecot(https://github.com/dovecot/core/) handles case insensitive Message-ID headers as per RFC. I can't raise a support issue with cPanel team (https://tickets.cpanel.net/review/login.cgi) as that needs an paid account with them. There may be an issue with the CPANEL/WHM DKIM module. Is the source code online? Rob

On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] > > > > For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick > > Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the

Hello everyone, I have setup Samba 3.0.28a on an Ubuntu 8.04 server. The setup that I am working with is an exact copy (as far as I can tell) if an identical installation that I did on a test box. Kerberos is setup and working properly. I can use kinit to issue tickets. The box has been successfully joined to the Active Directory domain. I can enumerate AD users and groups. I can log

On 01/03/2015 08:56 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: >>>>>> [ ... Failed to

To get the question of why new servers, this one I'm using has hardware whose remaining life is measured in days. The elastic bands and sticky tape it is held together with won't hold for much longer. I'm using it to build and test a new environment, but then I need to migrate that onto something with a little more vitality before bringing it into production (in the next 56 hours). As

So I had dhcp, radvd and bind working together nicely and now I threw in a wrench of setting up an AD DC I want to change my dhcp server setting to put client's into the new AD Domain but am a little hesitant as it is all working so nicely with DDNS I'm starting to think all I need to do is edit just my dhcpd.conf and change occurrences of DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD to

I have just set up a new AD and am having a little success with it, but DNS resolution is a little slow. I'm looking into why that is and tried an ns lookup for google.com and got the answer SERVFAIL on my AD server. The query was then passed to my next nameserver (google's own dns), which handled the query. Is this correct behaviour? I've not seen SERVFAIL before itadmin at

I'm having trouble with my new fileserver, I can't make the shares viewable by windows clients. I had the same problems with the first file server I built and cannot remember what I did to "fix" it. I have gone through the page "Setting up a share using Windows ACL's" on the Samba Wiki ( https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs) but

I had left my config alone for now and dhcp still writes to DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. But samba has been complaining about not being able to write to bind in its zone. [2016/05/27 07:30:06.738434, 0] ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295: Failed DNS update - NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL If you are right about it using kerberos I think I am