similar to: Question about memory upper limit

Hi, is there a memory limit for Linux pv_ops domU ? On my Dom0 (2.6.31.6-dae-dom0-00751-g60e0545 / Xen 3.4.2-2) I have a guest setup with 15600MB, when I start it, Linux (2.6.32.8) see only 8GB : Feb 17 07:31:04 pacman kernel: [ 0.000000] Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 2066366 On Dom0, I have CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY=32 If I do a "xm

Hello everyone! I'm trying to get tinc running, but couldn't make it until now... My current situation is: all tincs are connected, but there ist (almost) no traffic: Only two PCs are able to ping to another, but not to itself. Let me explain, what I'm planning to do: I've got four networks: PROM: 10.69.0.0/16 PAN: 192.168.30.0/24 (I'm afraid, I can't change PAN to

Hi all ! I would like to simulate spatial lattice/areal data with a conditional autoregressive (CAR) structure, for a given neighbouring matrix and for a autocorrelation "rho". Is there any package or function in R to perform it ? I found the function "CARsimu" in the hdeco library, but this is not what I'm looking for Thanks in advance Dae-Jin --

Hi all! I'm running some simulations and I need to estimate some paramaters with optim( ), in some cases optim stops with the next message: "L-BFGS-B needs finite values of 'fn' " I would like to know how to include and "if" condition when this happen, could it be something like: myfun <- optim(....) # run my function

David, Peter, Let me try it one more time, now with an example… Short of upstreaming a fake function clone pass, let me only illustrate the issue in raw debug output. Hopefully it should be sufficient. Try this: clang -Os -g -fno-strict-aliasing test_arg_del.ll -mllvm -debug -mllvm -print-after-all After DAE - Removing argument 1 (reg) from foo DAE - Removing argument 2

I am trying to follow this example for multinomial logistic regression http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/dae/mlogit.htm However, I cannot get it to work properly. This is the output I get, and I get an error when I try to use the mlogit function. Any ideas as to why this happens? > mydata <- read.csv(url("http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/dae/mlogit.csv")) > attach(mydata) >

A couple of new warnings and build errors appeared through the DRM tree in linux-next after the merge window opened. The first patch here is for scripts/headers_check.pl, but as the bug is only present in drm-next at the moment, it would be good to add all five patches to that tree before they make it into mainline. It's likely that some of these have already been fixed since this

I will start from afar… When a dead function argument is removed, should we keep around the debug info for it? I have the following case: define internal fastcc void @foo(i8* %aa, i8* %reg, i8* %field, i32 %bb, ...) unnamed_addr #3 !dbg !28 { entry: call void @llvm.dbg.value(metabb i8* %aa, i64 0, metabb !34, metabb !47), !dbg !57 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metabb i8* %reg, i64 0,

Hi all ! I've been trying to maximize a likelihood using optim( ) function, but it seems that the function has several local maxima. I've tried in my algorithm with different starting values and depending on them "optim" obtains different results... I use the "L-BFGS-B" method setting the lower values as 1e-06, because my parameters must be strictly positive. Also

It's 0. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com> Cc: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim at samsung.com> Cc: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim at samsung.com> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene at kernel.org> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> Cc: Patrik Jakobsson

Dear All 1) I'm fitting spatial CAR models using R2Winbugs and although everything seems to go reasonably well (or I think so) the next message appears from WINBUGS 1.4 window: gen.inits() Command #Bugs: gen.inits cannot be executed (is greyed out) The question is if this message means that something is wrong and the results are consequently wrong, or Can I assume it as a simple warning

On 21.11.2018 19:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Ville, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 18:13:42 EET Ville Syrjala wrote: >> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> >> >> Make life easier for drivers by simply passing the connector >> to drm_hdmi_avi_infoframe_from_display_mode() and >>

The epfn is being compared to (RDWR_COMPAT_MPT_VIRT_END - RDWR_COMPAT_MPT_VIRT_START) without a 2 bit shift, resulting in the epfn being compared to the size of the RDWR_COMPAT_MPT table in bytes instead of the maximum page frame number that the RDWR_COMPAT_MPT table can map. Signed-off-by: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com> diff -r 274e5accd62d -r 8b1e0a2ccd7f

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com> wrote: > This would specifically be for cases where we try to rewrite the > signature? I would assume we should forbid rewriting the signature of a > call with an operand bundle. And once some optimization drops the bundle > and preallocated marking, to allow such rewriting, the signature doesn’t > need

Hi all - my first time here and am having an issue with the Predict function. I am using a tutorial as a guide, locate here: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/STAT/R/dae/mlogit.htm My code gives this error > newdata1$predicted <- predict(mlogit,newdata=newdata1,type="response") Error in `$<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`, "predicted", value = c(0.332822934960197, : replacement has

From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> Here are again the last (?) bits of eliminating the plane->fb/crtc usage for atomic drivers. I've pushed everything else (thanks to everyone who reviewed them). Deepak said he'd tested the vmwgfx stuff, so I think it should be safe to land. Just missing a bit of review... Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at

I have installed R 2.2.1 in Solaris 10 and am trying to increase the memory capacity (the system has 16G RAM) to 3 or 4G, but I keep getting: > memory.limit(size=3000) Error: couldn't find function "memory.limit" Am I missing anything? I do that all the time under Windows. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Priscila [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Sorry for the delay. Arthur Eubanks has started working on the design here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74651 I felt I should follow up here about that. On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:47 PM Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com> wrote: > It doesn’t seem like multiple call sites should be a problem if they’re > sufficiently similar? If the argument layout for each callsite is the > same,

Hi, I have a problem with a dom0 which is unable to launch my domU : all my dom0 are Debian Lenny amd64 with Debian kernel 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 and xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64. Then all domU (PV) are Debian Lenny amd64 too, with vanilla kernel 2.6.29.6. So, this new dom0 can''t launch any domU which are working on an other dom0. Software is same on both dom0, and hardware is near the

On 03.12.2018 22:38, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:08:07AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> On 21.11.2018 19:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> Hi Ville, >>> >>> Thank you for the patch. >>> >>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 18:13:42 EET Ville Syrjala wrote: >>>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at