similar to: Samba4: no --use-ntvfs option on samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Samba4: no --use-ntvfs option on samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck"

2018 Apr 27
2
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck -> Too many open files
I just realize that i can't run a "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" on my DC's (4.7.6): ldb: unable to open modules directory '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ldb/modules/ldb' - Too many open files ldb: unable to open modules directory '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/ldb' - Too many open files ..... >From memory, it was just fine on samba 4.6 If I check system
2014 Aug 18
1
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck throws error
Hi all, We're seeing the following: root at dc3:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[sysvol]" ERROR(<type 'exceptions.TypeError'>): uncaught exception - (61, 'No data available') File
2015 Oct 03
3
Erro samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset/sysvolcheck
Hi I'm with this problem? Version: Samba 4.3 (4.2 upgrade) S.O .: Ubuntu 4.14 samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset open: error=2 (No such file or directory) ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741823, 'Undetermined error') File "/opt/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File
2023 Oct 19
1
Error in samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
That's not a problem its just a ACL provisioning message as you can see the result was "DAG:DAD:PAI" but expected was "O:DAG:DAD:PAR" that's "normal" ;-) just ignore it or do a "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset" Am 19.10.23 um 17:27 schrieb bd730c5053df9efb via samba: > Hi! > > I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck"
2016 Apr 22
3
Samba 4.4.2 "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset" is not working correctly
Samba 4.4.2 I was doing some maintenance work and I noticed that sysvolcheck gave some error. I ran "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset". Running sysvolcheck again still gives errors. I tried with several sysvol backups and the result is always the same. The affected policies are always "Default Domain Policy" and "Default Domain Controllers Policy". These policies
2014 Nov 07
1
sysvolcheck
I get this error when I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl)) There are two GPO directories. One is the Default Domain Controllers Policy and one is the Default Domain Policy It looks like it's the Default Domain Policy that's
2015 Nov 16
0
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck and sysvolreset
On my small, one DC AD setup, where I just followed the wiki and did not (!) make any other changes except for working on the AD through the RSAT, I ran samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck and got the following output: --------------------snip-------------------- ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
2017 May 11
2
Problems with samba-tool ntacl sysvol reset
Hi, after adding a new GPO the ntacl sysvolcheck fails and i want wo repair with ntacl sysvolreset.... biut this fails aslo in the end with: connect_acl_xattr: setting 'inherit acls = true' 'dos filemode = true' and 'force unknown acl user = true' for service sysvol open: error=2 (No such file or directory) ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741823,
2016 Feb 25
1
Can't create gpo with samba4.3 on FreeBSD and ZFS
I have samba 4.3 running on FreeBSD 10.2 on ZFS and I am unable to create new GPOs, getting "invalid Parameter" response.Log files indicate ACL issues. Domain was provisioned with --use-ntvfs option.Filesystem is mounted with this options:zroot/ROOT/default on / (zfs, local, noatime, nfsv4acls) acl options on zfs are this:zroot/ROOT/default aclmode passthrough inherited from
2023 Oct 19
1
Error in samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Hi! I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" on a DC and I got the following I pasted below. The first DC was provisioned migrating from a samba NT4 PDC with an LDAP backend using the classic upgrade procedure. I haven't detected any problem but I wanted to make sure there isn't any problem I might not be seeing yet. ERROR(<class
2020 May 20
2
sysvolcheck and sysvolreset errors
> > > Yes, There are three places where permissions are stored on sysvol (4 if you count in AD), the standard Linux permissions 'ugo', POSIX > ACLs as shown by getfacl and an EA (this is where the ACLs are stored when set from Windows). > > Try running 'samba-tool ntacl get /var/lib/samba/sysvol --as-sddl', this should produce something similar to this: >
2017 Jun 16
2
Erro sysvolcheck/sysvolreset
I run the sysvolreset by without it when I duplicate the gpo (rsync) problems occurs later on windows machines perform the same on the DC that received the copy .... Regards.... Em 16-06-2017 15:08, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > Mine looks similar, but I am/was trying to get samba-tool to work > correctly so there are some differences. Did you know that 'Domain >
2012 Oct 10
1
Samba4 sysvolcheck issue
Hi! Since samba4 rc1 (we update it since beta1) the "./samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" command returns the following : ERROR(<type 'exceptions.TypeError'>): uncaught exception - (61, 'No data available') File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 168, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File
2014 Apr 08
1
Samba4 policies acl corruption
Hi everybody. One month ago me migrated from samba 3.6 classic domain to samba4. After solving some minor problems, we have found ourselves with a ACL corruption and we don't know how to deal with this. When accesing to our sysvol shared (for example, \\domain.local\sysvol) from both Samba or Windows clients, we are refused to connect. Domain=[VECTORSF] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.4]
2017 May 13
2
Problems with samba-tool ntacl sysvol reset
Raspian root at samba01:~# uname -a Linux samba01 4.9.14-v7+ #977 SMP Mon Mar 13 18:25:19 GMT 2017 armv7l GNU/Linux root at samba01:~# cat /etc/debian_version 8.7 root at samba01:~# samba -V Version 4.6.3 root at samba01:~# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf # Global parameters [global] netbios name = SAMBA01 realm = LOCAL.xx.xx workgroup = LAURENZ server role = active
2020 May 19
2
sysvolcheck and sysvolreset errors
I have a samba DC based on Debian Buster running samba 4.12.2 from Louis' repo. A second DC on Raspbian buster is running samba 4.12.0. I have sysvol replication working using rsync/unison as per the WiKi. I wasn't having any issues until I tried to edit a GPO and found that all the acl settings had disappeared. This may have happened when I upgraded the DCs from 4.11.x to 4.12.x
2017 Oct 26
3
sysvolcheck on fresh samba 4.7 DCs
Hi Andrew and Louis, Found the issue: after rsync-ing the sysvol from our old decommissioned DCs, the sysvolreset/sysvolcheck DO work out. I tried to keep the things simple first, by NOT immediately importing our old sysvol contents, but first check with a default sysvol... I thought that the sysvolreset would just reset whatever is located under samba/sysvol, but I guess that it reads the
2014 Jun 23
1
Command samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Can anyone explain what is happening when I run / usr / local / samba / bin / samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck it and an error? ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO file /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tdsfs01.net/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Scripts/scripts.ini
2017 Oct 26
4
sysvolcheck on fresh samba 4.7 DCs
Hi, I joined a new samba-4.7 DC to our AD, replicated everything over, then turned off the old DCs, seized fsmo roles, and added two extra 4.7 DCs. Everything above succeeded without warnings, and everything seems to be running very well finally, except for the sysvolcheck / sysvolreset. We're on xfs, and the File System Support checks on the samba wiki page all pass, although at the
2014 Feb 26
1
FreeBSD/ZFS/S3FS usage and development questions
I've noticed that the samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset --use-s3fs command does not work on a ZFS filesystem on FreeBSD. It does work if sysvol is moved to a volume that is able to be mounted with the acls flag. I will reference a ticket I started with FreeNAS here: https://bugs.freenas.org/issues/4351 As of version 9.2.1.1 s3fs is now the default using the workaround known for FreeBSD.