similar to: [Bug 804] New: localhost port forwarding to a different host with DNAT

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=804 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com Resolution|

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160 Bug ID: 1160 Summary: dnat ip address not shown in nft list output when using port value Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428 Bug ID: 1428 Summary: Unable to dnat to port without defining destination address in inet table Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763 Summary: dnat and snat not changing port numbers on sctp packets Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: NAT AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1134 Bug ID: 1134 Summary: snat and dnat should accept mapping concatenated values for address and port Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1117 Bug ID: 1117 Summary: Table ipv4-nat prerouting dnat doesn't accept dest IP:PORT Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1501 --- Comment #9 from Phil Sutter <phil at nwl.cc> --- (In reply to marco.drummer from comment #8) > (In reply to Phil Sutter from comment #7) > > I am currently using iptables v1.8.7 (nf_tables) on Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS > > Almost all of my rules are converted to nft to make use of the advantages > and simplifications in

Hi folks, Has anyone out there done port forwarding or DNAT for UDP packets that are normally sent to the broadcast address (255.255.255.255)? I have to support a nasty database application called FileMaker Pro (those of you who know it are probably groaning about now), which uses broadcasts to locate the database server. Theoretically, i can get around this requirement by using LDAP lookups

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514 Richard Clark <richardc at cybrick.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |richardc at cybrick.com Resolution|DUPLICATE

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=514 Summary: Making DNAT --to-destination resolve service named of port Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel)

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1501 --- Comment #8 from marco.drummer at outlook.com --- (In reply to Phil Sutter from comment #7) I am currently using iptables v1.8.7 (nf_tables) on Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS Almost all of my rules are converted to nft to make use of the advantages and simplifications in syntax. However since shifted port ranges are still not available I still have a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1501 Phil Sutter <phil at nwl.cc> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phil at nwl.cc --- Comment #7 from Phil Sutter <phil at nwl.cc> --- Hi, (In reply to marco.drummer from comment

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=850 Summary: DNAT applied even after deleting the IP Tables DNAT Rule Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1056 Bug ID: 1056 Summary: nft: Syntax error with dnat as ct state Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1423 Bug ID: 1423 Summary: iptables-translate silently discards --ctstate DNAT Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=471 Summary: UDP stream DNAT problem Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 Summary: DNAT to internal network don't work with source routing and 2 uplinks Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=552 Summary: Strange DNAT behaviour... packet don't pass to PREROUTING and go directly in INPUT !! Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1448 Bug ID: 1448 Summary: SNAT/DNAT/Masquerading not working for UDPLite protocol Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: NAT

Hi, after kernel upgrade to 2.4.23 my existing configuration of shorewal 1.4.8 will not start / it fail on DNAT and/or masq with message: "iptables: Invalid argument" / I founded some similar problems description - see links bellow, but there is no solution how to get work shorewall with DNAT and masq with 2.4.23 kernel. http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.0/0268.html