similar to: Updating Samba

I'm pretty new to compiling software, although I would rather compile my own Samba 4.0.0 server rather than wait for it to become available in the repositories of my distribution. How do you update compiled software. Like if I compile and install Samba 4.0.0, and then 4.0.1 comes out, Is there a way to update to that without starting from scratch and having to rebuild my domain? Thanks

I'm just curious how this works. I've set up an Active Directory Domain controller using Samba 4.0.0. I DO NOT have Winbind configured. When I run "ls -al /samba/share/directory" I notice that I have users named like 3000000 belonging to the group "users". Without windbind configured, how do I have users and groups inside of my Samba domain (for instance the

I created a test domain on a Samba 4.0.0 machine, and added a Server 2008 R2 server. I joined it as a domain controller and DNS server. I've noticed that records that I create on one server aren't being replicated to the other. I experienced this with some of the Betas and Release Candidates too, but I thought it was fixed. Why isn't DNS replication working? Thanks Samba team

I have Samba 4.6.6 running as an ADDC and all is working great. I have a Samba 3.6.9 File Server that I want to join to the domain. I have gone through the steps but am having issues. In my smb.conf file I have added the following realm = my.domain security = ads encrypt passwords = yes I edited my Kerberos file [libdefaults] default_realm = MY.DOMAIN dns_lookup_kdc = true

Hey everyone. I compiled Beta 9 and used the Bind9 DNS server for Samba DNS. Now I'd like to compile and set up RC1. I hear that it uses the new internal DNS server by default. Is there any additional configuration that needs to be set up here with the new DNS implementation?

I've compiled, installed, and set up the first Samba release candidate three times this last week, and every time I've noticed that the provision step is not creating a Reverse Lookup Zone. It creates a Forward Lookup Zone with all the A records of the test clients that I join, but there's no Reverse Lookup Zone for the client's PTR records. When I was using the BIND DNS server,I

I too have been experiencing the same issues with my Samba server and Windows 8. I am currently running Samba 4.0.3. My Windows 7 client's profiles are synchronizing, but I am receiving that same error on my Windows 8 machines. The user has full permissions over their roaming profile directory, so I'm not too sure what the issue is.

Yes I shut down the original DC, and noticed most of the AD relient services were hanging, and I think the culprit was DNS on the new DC. Would you guys recommend waiting for 4.5, or switching to the BIND backend? The only reason that I chose the internal DNS server in the first place was that I thought Kai said the BIND side wasn't getting as much love these days. On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at

Hey everyone. I've had an AD domain running on a samba server for years now. I recently decided to add a second samba DC. (both 4.4.5) I ran through all the DNS checks mentioned here... https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Check_and_fix_DNS_entries_on_DC_joins All the entries were there! However, I noticed that the domain only has one NS record present. "host mydomain.com" returns both

Hi All, Has anyone figured out a nice way to restrict user access to puppetdb''s http web interface? Such as a .htaccess method or something similar? I would prefer something along those lines instead of setting up firewall rules. -Zane -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Release Announcements --------------------- This is a security release in order to address CVE-2013-0172. o CVE-2013-0172: Samba 4.0.0 as an AD DC may provide authenticated users with write access to LDAP directory objects. In AD, Access Control Entries can be assigned based on the objectClass of the object. If a user or a group the user is a member of has any access based on

Release Announcements --------------------- This is a security release in order to address CVE-2013-0172. o CVE-2013-0172: Samba 4.0.0 as an AD DC may provide authenticated users with write access to LDAP directory objects. In AD, Access Control Entries can be assigned based on the objectClass of the object. If a user or a group the user is a member of has any access based on

I figure some one here may find this interesting. I just begun work on allowing a smb home directory to be automounted upon login. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pam_exec.c.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 213 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/attachments/20070519/19e6bd01/pam_exec.c.bin

Any way to check if another proc has run or been run by a proc that is setuid or seteuid?

Hello, Today I tried to upgrade from samba 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 on my test environment. I patched the source with the diffs patch-4.0.0-4.0.1.diffs, patch-4.0.1-4.0.2.diffs, patch-4.0.2-4.0.3.diffs , then make, make install. # samba-tool dbcheck Checking 807 objects Not fixing nTSecurityDescriptor on CN=Performance Monitor Users,CN=Builtin,DC=inview,DC=local <--- all errors were

Hi all, it seems that from R 4.0.1 EXTPTR_PTR can be either a macro or a function, depending on whether USE_RINTERNALS is requested. Jeroen helped me find that this was in 78592: https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/c634fec5214e73747b44d7c0e6f047fefe44667d This is a problem, because binary packages that are built on R 4.0.1 or R 4.0.2 will potentially not load on R 4.0.0, if they use the

>>>>> Martin Maechler >>>>> on Wed, 27 May 2020 13:35:44 +0200 writes: >>>>> Herv? Pag?s >>>>> on Tue, 26 May 2020 12:38:13 -0700 writes: >> Hi Martin, On 5/26/20 06:24, Martin Maechler wrote: ... >>> >>> What about remaining back-compatible, not only to R 3.y.z >>> with

Has anyone else ran into this? debug: /Stage[main]/Mcollective/File[/var/tmp/facts.yaml]/content: Executing ''diff -u /var/tmp/facts.yaml /tmp/puppet-file20121214-13448-933j3r-0'' notice: /Stage[main]/Mcollective/File[/var/tmp/facts.yaml]/content: --- /var/tmp/facts.yaml 2012-12-14 00:53:20.000000000 +0000 +++ /tmp/puppet-file20121214-13448-933j3r-0 2012-12-14

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 5 December 2016 at 18:56, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers > <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> The idea is that Tom's stable releases will keep incrementing the >> "patch" part of the version numbers, just as today, so they would be >> 4.0.1, 4.0.2,

Hi, I'm seeming new regressions form 4.0.0 for mips big endian: DataFlowSanitizer-mips64 :: custom.cc DataFlowSanitizer-mips64 :: propagate.c SanitizerCommon-asan-mips-Linux :: sanitizer_coverage_trace_pc_guard-dso.cc SanitizerCommon-asan-mips-Linux :: sanitizer_coverage_trace_pc_guard.cc SanitizerCommon-asan-mips64-Linux :: Linux/getpwnam_r_invalid_user.cc