similar to: aoTuV

Hi All, I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is correct as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the secondary MX for domain bbbbb.co.uk do I just add a Connect:bbbbb.co.uk RELAY statement into /etc/mail/access and restart sendmail Obviously I have the DNS MX records for the domain are

Here is a OS X message URI in angled brackets: <message://%3cE1KzXg9-0000Qb-3G at smtp1.mail.ox.ac.uk%3e> Markdown yields: <p><message://%3cE1KzXg9-0000Qb-3G at smtp1.mail.ox.ac.uk%3e></p> Shouldn't it have given instead: <p><a href="message://%3cE1KzXg9-0000Qb-3G at smtp1.mail.ox.ac.uk%3e">message://%3cE1KzXg9-0000Qb-3G at

aoTuV Beta5 (based on aoTuV Release 1) http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ Changes: aoTuV Beta5 2006/10/24 * The action of noise normalization has been improved. This has an effect in the sound roughness and tremor problem etc. in the low bitrate. * The threshold of a stereo mode change was calculated dynamically. Some of problems which originate in channel coupling by this will improve. *

... and was wondering how it differs from the official libvorbis and why there is need for a fork. Could somebody shed some light on the past and background of the libvorbis/aoTuV story please? Both on- and offlist mails are welcome. Thanks in advance, Sebastian

Are there plans to incorporate aoTuV mode into vorbis, perhaps a commandline switch to make optionally available the aoTuV tunings? The abx results from aoTuV are impressive... http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?showtopic=21916&st=50&&#entry215109 -Dan

Soon, Firefox 3.1 and other browsers will start to support vorbis and users will increase vorbis use on the net. Most users (as most Linux distributions) are however using the reference xiph.org vorbis library which generate worse files than the aoTuV library from http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ . According to latest discussion: https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1251 the aoTuV code should have

Can someone explain this, I have both version of oggenc and oggenc-aotuv installed, wanted to compare theme.. BUT, when I type the commanded: rick@KB32bit:~$ oggenc-aotuv -v OggEnc v1.0.1 (libvorbis 1.0.1) rick@KB32bit:~$ Why don't I see OggEnc-Aotuv Beta 5...etc Odd? Thanks - Rich

I released "aoTuV" beta6 of OggVorbis encoder, library. ---------------------------------------- CHANGES (for general) from beta5.7 # Libvorbis aoTuV was unified with Xiph.Org's libvorbis1.3.2. # Pre(post)-echo of the specific pattern was improved. # The bit allotment when sound of the different type coexisted was improved. # The calculation method of dynamic thresholds

when will be merged the vorbis-aotuv branch into the reference library of vorbis? I feel that the development of vorbis is almost null if the aotuv don't exist... it will be nice to have the reference library using the last tunings as soon as posible... I gess it will be 1.1.3? or there are other surprises that can make it 1.2.0? __________________________________________________ Correo

I released "aoTuV" beta6.03 (2014) of OggVorbis encoder and library (based on libVorbis). Source code and reference binary (win32) is here. http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANGES (for general) from old beta6.03 # The latest aoTuV beta6.03 was unified with Xiph.Org's libvorbis1.3.4. The part

For those who missed it, there's a new release of aoTuV (beta 4.5). According to Aoyumi-san, there's some new tuning for audio below quality set 3 (-q3), but I have not tested it myself yet. I wonder when Monty will actually check the new versions of aoTuV and merge them with main trunk. Latest tests on HA show the latest tunings of Aoyumi-san have matured Vorbis a lot, and

Hi, Excuse my ignorance, I'm primarily a LInux user and don't have a Windows install on any hardware that's actually working at the moment. Is it possible to use aoTuV B3 with Oddcast? Is this simply a matter of replacing a DLL? If so, are there any precompiled DLLs anywhere, or is anyone with the appropriate tools prepared to cook one up for me? I have people who are probably

I announce release of libvorbis aoTuV beta 5.6. This is the library of Ogg Vorbis I conformity. I performed original tuning (part of encoding) for the reference source code of Ogg Vorbis of Xiph.Org to origin. Changed part from beta5.5 # ?Important!? The security hole of old libvorbis origin was fixed like latest libvorbis. The software using the decode function of the former library should

aoTuV beta4 is based on libVorbis1.1.1 now!! http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/

aoTuV pre-beta4 [20050412] http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/test.html

I announce the revision version of aoTuV beta5.6. Changed part from beta5.6 # Fixed the error to occur by specific software. (floating point exception) Aoyumi

This is the library of Ogg Vorbis I conformity. I performed original tuning (part of encoding) for the reference source code of Ogg Vorbis of Xiph.Org to origin. ***** Changed part from beta5 ***** # The noise control of the Impulse block was expanded. This is effective with the outstanding sample of the pre-echo. # The pre-echo reduction code came to work at a lower bit rate. # Noise

Hello, Since the list was upgraded I have noticed i am getting 2 copies of each message. I only today had a chance to look into this and wonder if someone can help me figure out what's happening & clean up my list subscription. For every post I am seeing identical posts from 2 different hosts: 1) westfish.xiph.org 2) master.debian.org I am guessing that there is a listserv running on

Smtp1.song.fi and smtp2.song.fi, our list servers, seem to have gotten listed in the bl.spamcop.net RBL. Spamcop listings are temporary and will time out, and because of occasional major false positives (or perhaps collateral damage?) like this I don't use it to reject mail. Anyone who IS using Spamcop to reject mail has missed much of today's list traffic. -- mail to this

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://westfish.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20040616/9a2bfd8d/attachment.pgp