similar to: Question about the identification header

Thanks for your replys. >packets don't always begin at the >start of a page OK, since I only want to read / write the Vorbis comments, I can limit it to the Vorbis header packets. http://xiph.org/vorbis/doc/Vorbis_I_spec.html stats that the comment header always begins on the second ogg page. Since the length of the precedent identification header is fixed, this even is a fixed offset

Hi. I am trying to understand how to package opus-encoded data in an ogg stream to make a standards-compilant ogg/opus file. Most things are clear, but there is one thing I simply do not understand. What I do understand is that Ogg is based on pages, that each come with a fairly sizeable header (>=27 bytes). Now, I encode with a fairly low bitrate, so my opus packages are <100 bytes long.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 12:23:47PM +0000, Mathias Kunter wrote: > OK, since I only want to read / write the Vorbis comments, I can limit it to the Vorbis header packets. > http://xiph.org/vorbis/doc/Vorbis_I_spec.html stats that the comment header always begins on the second ogg page. Since the length of the precedent identification header is fixed, this even is a fixed offset into the

HOgg 0.4.1 Released ------------------- The HOgg package provides a commandline tool for manipulating Ogg files, and a corresponding Haskell library. HOgg is in hackage, or on the web at: http://www.kfish.org/~conrad/software/hogg/ This is the fourth public release. The focus is on correctness of Ogg parsing, production and editing. The capabilities of the hogg commandline tool are roughly on

On 15/03/07, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 12:23:47PM +0000, Mathias Kunter wrote: > > > > In contrast to that, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3533.txt stats the following: > > "Ogg Vorbis provides the name and revision of the Vorbis codec, > > the audio rate and the audio quality on the Ogg Vorbis bos page. > > It also uses

hello all - this is probably something simple, but i am on-the-road and cant find a quick solution. ?i cant seem to get the opus toolset to recognize the ogg library. ?i was able to successfully get opus to work with FFMPEG, but not the toolset. when i go to install opus-tools, i get the following message: No package 'ogg' found i would like to have opusenc working, since i have 700k

Hi all, something which came up recently in relation to the design of Kate's granulepos was whether or not the granulepos of successive Ogg pages is allowed to be the same, ie. whether or not granulepos must be strictly increasing. As this question is more generally about Ogg granulepos, how about we answer it first and then get back to the discussion of Kate's granulepos ... Here is

I'd like to get basic information about a Theora file using C# .NET. How can I get started on this? I know there's oggz-info and other utilities, but I'd like to do this straight from in .NET. What's the documentation page to find more on this? Can I just read the first x bytes of the video corresponding to each field? I found this page which I think is what I need, but I'm

Hi Vorbis-Dev, I'm investigating various WebM/Vorbis bugs in chromium. AFAIK muxing Vorbis inside of WebM does not have an official specification, so I'm using ffmpeg's implementation to try to answer 2 questions: 1. Under what circumstances is it valid to find WebM Blocks containing Vorbis data with zero duration? (This would mean the next Block in the Cluster has the exact

Hey all, friendly ping :) Any help is much appreciated. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Chris Cunningham <chcunningham at chromium.org > wrote: > Hi Vorbis-Dev, > > I'm investigating various WebM/Vorbis bugs in chromium. AFAIK muxing > Vorbis inside of WebM does not have an official specification, so I'm using > ffmpeg's implementation to try to answer 2

Hi All, Can any one link me or send me a complete detailed spec of Vorbis encoder? I found the Vorbis_I_spec.pdf but it does not provide much information about encoding procedure. Ravi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20050829/cf209e5a/attachment.html

Hi all, I am a developer for embedded system and totally new to Opus and open source audio codec. I'm now using Microchip dsPIC33 to develop a decoder for Opus. I am now using sources of libopus. The first question is for calling opus_decode(), do I need to skip the header bytes of an opus file before I can input the file data to opus_decode()? Or will libopus handle this automatically?

Thanks for a very quick and very good answer. Let me just double-check one thing: > To put multiple Ogg Opus packets in an Ogg page, all you need to do is > start a new segment for each Ogg Opus packet. There can be up to 255 > segments per page. For details, see the Ogg specification: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3533 So do I understand it correctly that a decoder will

hello, i'm reading the doc at http://xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/Vorbis_I_spec.html and the link to the paper http://www.iocon.com/resource/docs/ps/eusipco_corrected.ps doesn't work. Could anyone correct the link and/or mirror this paper ? Thanks, YG --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list,

Hi, I am trying to implement ogg vorbis real time decoder on SHARC ADSP 21364 processor. I am writing my own version of the decoder using the documentation vorbis_I_spec.pdf from xiph.org. However I am facing certain hurdles in floor curve decoding during audio packet decode. In the spec it says that [cval] = read from packet using codebook number [so and so] in *scalar context*.(page no 43).

Ralph, thanks for your help. >>Since the length of the precedent identification header is fixed, this even is a fixed offset >>into the logical ogg stream. >This will work for all the vorbis-only files I've seen (because no one >pads the first packet). You should really implement a proper ogg parser, >but by all means get a hack working first. I will of course use the

How would one implement the following scheme with minimal use of resources: Every Vorbis packet should be preprocessed to a certain extent, that is, the beginning of every audio packet should be parsed and some decoding steps executed. The result of this predecode as well as the rest of the packet should then be sent as output for final processing. I have skimmed through the standard, and as far

Hi, In the course of some work which I describe below, I have found a very significant difference between the BARK function described in the Vorbis specification and its implementation in libvorbis. In the specificationhttp://xiph.org/vorbis/doc/Vorbis_I_spec.pdf bark(x) = 13.1arctan(.00074x) + 2.24arctan(.0000000185x**2 + .0001x) In the libvorbis code

I've checked to web for the format of the .spx file, and have not found anything complete. I've attached what I have deciphered so far. There are a few question marks in my tables that I want to understand better. I've also attached the .spx file that I used in the example values. I'm trying to take Speex-encoded data from an embedded microprocessor and put it into the .spx

Hi. I think that vorbis-tools use a wrong order for channels when dealing with 5.1 surround WAV files. More precisely, I find in the Vorbis specification that the output order is: 0: front left 1: front center 2: front right 3: rear left 4: rear right 5: LFE (source: http://www.xiph.org/vorbis/doc/Vorbis_I_spec.html#id342556 ) At the same time, the order of channels in WAV files seems to be: