similar to: Re: Ogg Spec, etc.

Fredag, 11 oktober 2002, skrev du: >Rubbish. Been there, done that (multiple times). Look at rehuff, for >example; written without looking at libvorbis (nor at the spec). And you wrote that without any knowledge about the file format? Tor <p><p>=================================================================== EASY and FREE access to your email anywhere:

Torsdag, 10 oktober 2002, skrev du: >Actually, people have implemented perfectly valid Vorbis encoders and >decoders before the specification was even published. I wouldn't go so far >as to call other people on this list dirty liars, but I suspect that the >spec that's published is good enough for them, and they're simply >dealing with different issues than you are,

No offense, Segher, but the output quality of this thing is awful. =) I'll disregard the fact that, at least with *my* compiler, the source tarball I downloaded reduces every packet to zero bytes, which isn't terribly interesting. I decided to set the byte reduction to something constant: I started by dividing each packet's size by 2 just to see what would happen. The resulting ogg

Hello, I am a computer engineering student and compression hobbyst and have recently developed a new entropy coding algorithm. It can be used to achieve compression proper of arithmetic coders at very high speeds -almost like Huffman codecs-. Since it could be of interest to you, I send it as an attachment -code and technical report-. Please, drop me a line in case you have any doubt or

Hi all, Yes, it's true. A new version of rehuff, the tool that losslessly compresses Vorbis files: one that is easy to compile, and that works with newer-than-two-years-ago streams, too! On 1.0 streams, you get about 3% size reduction, and the headers get _much_ smaller (which helps for fast-start network streams). Building it should be easy (you might have to add some -I and -L for

Hi all, Yes, it's true. A new version of rehuff, the tool that losslessly compresses Vorbis files: one that is easy to compile, and that works with newer-than-two-years-ago streams, too! On 1.0 streams, you get about 3% size reduction, and the headers get _much_ smaller (which helps for fast-start network streams). Building it should be easy (you might have to add some -I and -L for

Hiya, Here is the sources to my "rehuff" program. ./rehuff in.ogg out.ogg does a lossless recoding of a vorbis stream. (It generates optimal huffman codes for the particular stream). This code is meant for developers only, until someone is kind enough to provide good build and configure support for it. I won't. And no installation help questions please. There is a little patch

Hi there. I have a short .ogg with Vorbis stream @56kbps from a 44.1 16bits stereo sample, which weights exactly 135'781 bytes. Packed to ZIP, it goes down to 109'485 bytes, that's a 80% ratio ! Even worse with latest RAR3 archive, with which the file size goes to 104'349 (76%). <sceptical> I admit this sample is a bit repetitive, but I guess the probability of having the

I took 5 albums (Classical music) and converted them to Ogg Vorbis at "Full Bitrate" (-q10) and all 5 directories take up about 775 Megs which won't fit on a CD. So I ripped them again in WAV first (And give my friend back his CDs) but now I wanna know what quality setting should I use to fit them on 1 CD (The highest possible with total space used just under 700 Megs)

Hi- just wondering, what would be the best quality rating to use to fit lots of music into 10GB of HD space. The audio quality has to be high enough for it to sound good when played through PA systems (for when my college is stupid enough to forget to hire a DJ, or when the realise the DJ they always hire can't use a mixing desk properly) ranging from a functional PA system thats stuck in the

On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 14:35 -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 02:17:22PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > > > I'm working on support for tagging Speex files for Mutagen[0] and part > > of the specification at [1] is confusing me. It says the first page > > should have granulepos 0 and packetno 0. Does this really mean page > > sequence number 0,

On Sunday 01 November 2020 09:02:56 Charles Lepple wrote: > Gene, > > you might have missed this email, and I admit I wasn't very precise > with my wording. Yes, or at least I don't recall it, which at my age IS a possibility. More below as needed. > This particular UPS model is returning a fixed (in the sense of > "constant") integer "24" (not

Hi. I have been working on a tool whose goal is to reduce the bit rate of theora video by decoding to DCT coefficients, reducing the entropy of the coefficients, and re-tokenizing the stream. I have successfully used the decoder source to extract the DCT coefficients for each block, and I am able to capture any and all relevant information about where the block of coefficients falls in the

Hi, I'm trying to get ffmpeg (linked with libvorbis 1.2.3) to generate a 96kHz ogg file, but I seem to be limited to 50kHz . The command is ffmpeg -i t16bit96kHz.wav -acodec libvorbis test.ogg and I get the error message [libvorbis @ 0x2051460]oggvorbis_encode_init: init_encoder failedError while opening codec for output stream #0.0 - maybe incorrect parameters such as bit_rate, rate, width

From: Nathaniel Gray <n8gray@gmail.com> Date: Sep 14, 2005 11:30 AM Subject: Newbie q: decoupling vorbis from ogg To: vorbis-dev@lists.xiph.org Hi, Sorry if this is a newbie question. I'm trying to write an OS X AudioCodec for Vorbis using libvorbis. I'm confused about the libvorbis dependency on libogg. I thought the vorbis spec didn't require ogg as the container, but the

> Am 25.01.2021 um 17:04 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > > On 1/22/21 5:12 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> On 1/22/21 9:29 AM, Marc Balmer via CentOS wrote: >>>> Hence it is as good as dead in my mind when looking into the future, I >>>> am looking for future distro of choice. >>> >>> A little mentioned choice would

(Sending again after subscribing, I guess the moderator is on vacation.) I'm working on support for tagging Speex files for Mutagen[0] and part of the specification at [1] is confusing me. It says the first page should have granulepos 0 and packetno 0. Does this really mean page sequence number 0, since the Ogg format doesn't number packets? If it doesn't mean page sequence number,

Dear experts, I am trying to use an example I found here: http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/vorbis/examples/encoder_example.c Could you please tell me what float** buffer is needed for (I don't see it used anywhere). Also, could you please tell me what this code is doing: for(i=0;i<bytes/4;i++){ buffer[0][i]=((readbuffer[i*4+1]<<8)|

Hello, All. I am making an Ogg Vorbis decoder based on Tremor. The Vorbisfile library provides a high-level API which enables us to seek in the file, but it needs to declare a pointer to OggVorbis_File structure. Because I am supposed not to use file, so I can't use the ov_pcm_seek() or ov_raw_seek() functions to seek in the file. For decoding an Ogg Vorbis file, I first put it in

Hi, I need to compile Icecast on a kind of ancient AIX machine. I compiled all the required libraries, except libvorbis, and I can't make it compile at all. Is there a way to compile Icecast without Ogg Vorbis support? Thanks! -- Regards, Alek Andreev alek@zvuk.net