similar to: [Jan.Tangring@et.se: spectral band replication]

>> Do you (or the ogg vorbis community) understand how SBR works? There is >> info on http://www.codingtechnologies.de/technology/sbr.htm >> bnut I am guessing this infop is not enough to explain the technology. Robert Voigt: >I haven't heard about SBR before. After reading that webpage I can say the >following: [ . . . ] I don't think SBR will give an

Just a reminder to keep testing. The latest builds should be rock solid. The url is: http://i.cantcode.com:8888/stats.xml You can now get stats ouptut by pointing a browser to: http://i.cantcode.com:8888/stats.xml We're looking for more win32 freeamp reports, and any other clients besdies the standard ones (sonique, winamp, xmms, etc). Oh, and I stuck some silly station ids in between

Just a reminder to keep testing. The latest builds should be rock solid. The url is: http://i.cantcode.com:8888/stats.xml You can now get stats ouptut by pointing a browser to: http://i.cantcode.com:8888/stats.xml We're looking for more win32 freeamp reports, and any other clients besdies the standard ones (sonique, winamp, xmms, etc). Oh, and I stuck some silly station ids in between

Well, I don't know what SBR is, but there's something in the wideband mode that may be similar: It's possible to encode the whole 4-8 kHz band with just ~1-2 kbps by only encoding the (LPC) shape of the spectrum and then just filling that band with "something that makes sense". Quality is quite reasonable... Jean-Marc Le dim 13/10/2002 à 06:18, Steve Underwood a

If anyone is interested, mp3PRO demo is available on Coding Technologies web site: http://www.codingtechnologies.de/ Demo is a Win32 encoder/player, and it is limited to 64kbps only. I did a quick test, and it really sounds good at 64kbps (but not as good as 128kbps - we all know that was hype). SBR (Spectral Band Replication) seems to be working pretty well. Of course SBR is only used if you

Hello, I am trying to get a package to pass R CMD check on an iMac running Mac OS X. When the package is named safeBinaryRegression I get the following warning from R CMD check: * checking whether the name space can be loaded with stated dependencies ... WARNING Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) : function 'make_lp' not provided by package 'lpSolveAPI'

Thanks! Btw, have you tried using SBR-technology or similar with speech codecs? That might be a good idea I thought.. But I don't know if it produces as good quality with speech codecs as it does for music codecs. Do you know if there is any open source variant of SBR? /Pontus -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org [mailto:owner-speex-dev@xiph.org]För Jean-Marc

Sort of off topic, but I was wondering about how the SBR data factors into an mp3pro bitrate. If you encode a "64kbps" mp3pro stream, I'm guessing that 64kbps would include the SBR data. So, when played in a normal MP3 player, would a 64kbps mp3pro stream actually sound worse than a 64kbps MP3 stream? Tony Arcieri --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg

Hi., do you think that sbr policy in queue strategy will be useful? Bye ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: nik600 <nik600 at gmail.com> Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:21:14 +0100 Subject: add a new queue strategy: SBR To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com> Hi to all isn't there any plan to add the Skills Based Routing strategy in

Hello, Are there any open source project that is similar to SBR from Coding Technologies that possibly could be used together with Ogg Vorbis? /Pontus <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word

Important (imho)! I found this site in the internet: http://www.plusv.org/ PlusV is an audio enhancement algorithm similar to SRB of Mp3Pro, but 1) better than SBR 2) Fully open-source It seems to me wise to include PlusV into new versions of Ogg Vorbis. P.S. what about some long-awaited features in Ogg Vorbis? 1) ability to turn off the frequency filter in the encoder (especially for high

First: I am not a lawyer, this is no legal advice! On 16 May 2017, at 0:25, Robert Jeffares wrote: > Jack, > > I am using AAC+ encoded by Darkice and distributed on Icecast2 on a > Ubuntu server. I had to install a number of open source libraries and > compile darkice from source. No licence. This sounds like it would violate the license, given that the FAQ on

On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 01:59:05PM +0200, Michel van Dop wrote: > [2019-05-07 13:33:29] WARN format/format_get_type Unsupported or legacy > stream type: "audio/aacp". Falling back to generic minimal handler for best > effort. Is one source AAC-LC (standard AAC) and the other HE-AAC v2 (AAC+)? There are three variants of AAC: AAC-LC HE-AAC (= AAC-LC with SBR) HE-AAC v2 (=

Hello. I have same problem, and I think that it's because AAC+ uses VBR and when it's changes, is not the same bitrate, because varies... El jue., 9 may. 2019 a las 21:29, Michel van Dop (<mvandop at xs4all.nl>) escribió: > Hi Paul, > > Thank you for the information. I already try a player to discover the > stream type of both streams if the are the same. > But i can

Hi Jean Marc and List, So I have started finally fiddling around with Ultra-wideband mode. It appears to be very similar in operation to Wide mode, except that when peering into the packet structure it looks like (and these are kind of questions as much as statements here): 1. update rate 0 is not used in UWB- only 1-4? 2. The total bits used for each UWB update rate seem to be as follows:

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:48:50AM +1100, Michael Smith wrote: > > Ogg Vorbis is the format we recommend for both high quality or low > bitrate. The downside of it is worse compatibility than mp3 - not > everyone has a vorbis player, yet. AAC has compatibility problems too, > and generally doesn't exceed vorbis in quality, so you're on the right > track - use vorbis

It's really pretty simple. You can download the code and build it all you want... ...for yourself. It cannot be distributed, sold, or used commercially in any way. That's all. /g. -----Original Message----- From: Icecast [mailto:icecast-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of Robert Jeffares Sent: Tuesday, 16 May, 2017 17:03 To: icecast at xiph.org Subject: Re: [Icecast] Frauenhofer signing

Hello, I work in a development shop where we write code for both Linux and Windows, and develop on both OS's on a codebase stored on a Linux drive with Samba shares. Ever since I 'upgraded' my Windows 2000 system to service pack 3, I have been having trouble compiling my code with Visual Studio over this Samba connection. Basically what happens is that Visual Studio reports

Sorry for the crosspost but it's relevant to Vorbis and Icecast I believe. I'm seeing more and more streaming stations using AACplus, with many listeners being amazed at the sound quality. Most say that a 48kb/s sounds better than a 128kb/s MP3, which would put Ogg Vorbis at around 96kb/s IMO. That means only half the bitrate is required in AACplus compared to Ogg Vorbis for the same

Sorry for the crosspost but it's relevant to Vorbis and Icecast I believe. I'm seeing more and more streaming stations using AACplus, with many listeners being amazed at the sound quality. Most say that a 48kb/s sounds better than a 128kb/s MP3, which would put Ogg Vorbis at around 96kb/s IMO. That means only half the bitrate is required in AACplus compared to Ogg Vorbis for the same