similar to: Trying to build on Windows.

Hi, I've downloaded the Speex-1.1.5 code and am trying to compile the Speexdec code using Microsoft VC++ 6.0 IDE. When I try to open the speexdec.dsw workspace, I get a dialog asking to locate the ogg_static file. I simply cancel that message, and then the project is opened in the VC++ 6.0 IDE. Now, when I simply try to compile the program, I receive this 5 error messages. error1.

Sorry for starting another topic, this is actually a reply to Segher's post on Sun Oct 22 on the 'mdct question' topic. I wasn't subscribed properly and so I didn't get email confirmation and thus can't add to that thread. So Segher, if the equation is indeed what you say it is, then replacing mdct_backward with this version should work, but it doesn't. Am I applying

As some of you know, I'm creating a hardware MDCT core. At the moment I'm working out the best way to create a lookup table for the trig values, as set up in mdct_init: /* trig lookups... */ for(i=0;i<n/4;i++){ T[i*2]=FLOAT_CONV(cos((M_PI/n)*(4*i))); T[i*2+1]=FLOAT_CONV(-sin((M_PI/n)*(4*i))); T[n2+i*2]=FLOAT_CONV(cos((M_PI/(2*n))*(2*i+1)));

Bugs item #27425, was opened at 2009-11-11 21:15 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=27425&group_id=85 Category: win32-open3 Group: Code Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Daniel Berger (djberg96) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: win32-open3 doesn''t build with 1.9.1 Initial Comment: Windows XP VC++ 9

I tried to download/compile/install win32-dir, but I couldn''t get it to go. Over a private email Daniel Berger had me... "Curious. What platform are you on exactly? Try modifying the extconf.rb file. Add ''have_library("SHFolder")'' above ''have_library("shell32")''. If that doesn''t work, try uncommenting the other

Hello, I am trying to use Rinside package in my VC++.Net program ( using Visual Studio 8.0 environment). I have downloaded Windows binary of RInside from the following link http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RInside/index.htm Version of RInside - 0.2.3 While compiling the program , i am getting about 69 error. Some of them are the folllowing ones. Please me in solving the following issue

I'm working on getting the Darwin/Mac OS X port of Vorbis up and running again and have run into problems building libvorbisfile. I have installed the latest libtool (1.3.5) and modified it to handle Darwin/Mac OS X better (to create shared libraries, dylibs, that can be linked against other dylibs instead of creating bundles which cannot be used as input to the linker). But, when it tries

#bug 1: besselI() for nu<0 and expon.scaled=TRUE #tested with R-devel (2007-06-17 r41981) x <- 2.3 nu <- -0.4 print(paste(besselI(x, nu, TRUE), "=", exp(-x)*besselI(x, nu, FALSE))) #fix: #$ diff bessel_i_old.c bessel_i_new.c #57c57 #< bessel_k(x, -alpha, expo) * ((ize == 1)? 2. : 2.*exp(-x))/M_PI #--- #> bessel_k(x, -alpha, expo) * ((ize == 1)? 2. :

void inverse_mdct_slow(float *buffer, int n) { =A0=A0 int i,j; =A0=A0 int n2 =3D n >> 1; =A0=A0 float *x =3D (float *) malloc(sizeof(*x) * n2); =A0=A0 memcpy(x, buffer, sizeof(*x) * n2); =A0=A0 for (i=3D0; i < n; ++i) { =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 float acc =3D 0; =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 for (j=3D0; j < n2; ++j) =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 // formula from paper: =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 //acc +=3D n/4.0f *

Changes from RFC PATCH v3 - Just rebased on tip - For all else, please see notes from RFC PATCH v3 at http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/2015-March/002902.html - latest wip opus tree/branch https://git.linaro.org/people/viswanath.puttagunta/Ne10.git branch: rfcv4_final_fft_ne10 Viswanath Puttagunta (1): armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library Makefile.am

Changes from RFC PATCH v2 - fixed compile issue when just compiling for --enable-intrinsics for ARMv7 without NE10 - Notes for NE10: - All compile/link warnings are now in upstream NE10 - Only patch pending upstream in NE10 is the one that needs to add -funsafe-math-optimizations for ARMv7 targets. - Phil Wang @ ARM is working on getting this fixed. - Note that even without

I thought it would be more update/better/faster, any thing wrong? In the future, would you use short, and forget about float? If so, I use 1.1.4, I wouldn't need to change my code in the future, right? You said, it's unstable, yes, I got compiling errors with MsVC6 and MsVC.net And I modified it a bit to get it compiled. Should I post the errors here? <p>-----Original Message-----

Hello opus-dev, I've been cooking up this patchset to integrate NE10 library into opus. Current patchset focuses on encode use case mainly effecting performance of clt_mdct_forward() and opus_fft() (for float only) Glad to report the following on Encode use case: (Measured on my Beaglebone Black Cortex-A8 board) - Performance improvement for encode use case ~= 12.34% (Based on time -p

Changes from RFC PATCH v1: - passing arch parameter explicitly - reduced stack usage by ~3.5K by using scaled NE10 fft version - moved all optimization array functions to arm_celt_map.c - Other cleanups pointed out by Timothy Phil, As you mentioned earlier, could you please address all compile and linker errors/warnings coming out of Ne10 library? You can find my working Ne10 repo at [1] You

Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > thanks for the patch. No prob :) > also, if you have miroslav's patch again a more updated version > of bitbuffer.c that would be great. I have been meaning to get > around to applying it for a long time. This is Miroslav's patch, from the mailing list post I dug up in the archives: --- orig/src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c +++

Optimize opus encode (float only) usecase using ARM NE10 library. Mainly effects opus_fft and ctl_mdct_forward and related functions. This optimization can be used for ARM CPUs that have NEON VFP unit. This patch only enables optimizations for ARMv7. Official ARM NE10 library page available at http://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/ To enable this optimization, use --enable-intrinsics

hy, here is my speex encoder/decoder .. the sampleRate i use is 16000 and quality,complexity are at 5. can someone take a look in to the code and see if there is something that is making that robot voice here is a link to colored and numbered code, same as below http://barvanjekode.gama.us/temp/1257361243.html thanx. code ----------------------- #include "codec.h"

Hello Vorbis folks, I'm one of the FFTW authors (www.fftw.org), and a few days ago I was playing with our codelet generator for fun and modified it to spit out hard-coded MDCTs of small sizes. The code (at jdj.mit.edu/~stevenj/mdct_128nr.c) for 256 samples (128 outputs) seems to be almost twice as fast as the Vorbis MDCT code for that size on my 2.2GHz P-IV (gcc 3.2.2 and flags "-O1

hy, recording and playback is working perfectly without speex. i have try to set samplerat from 6000 to 441000 and quality from 1 to 10 sam with complexy, but the best i can get is with 16000 samplerate, 5quality and 3complexy .. but still, the voice that came out is annoying, artificial, robot ,... Lp, Tim +--------------------------+ | email: rico at gama.us | | www: http://gama.us

After a few experiments, I found that both alternatives are very similar, and 2~5% slower compared to the following: diff --git a/celt/mdct.c b/celt/mdct.c index 1634e8e..e490c3b 100644 --- a/celt/mdct.c +++ b/celt/mdct.c @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ void clt_mdct_backward(const mdct_lookup *l, kiss_fft_scalar *in, kiss_fft_scala it in-place. */ { kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT yp0 =