similar to: Perl modules

Hello, I've been looking to the libvorbisfile and got into troubles when trying to use it: I need to compile it on a PalmOS and the libvorbisfile must be compiled in ARM whereas calling code is in 68K. This implies that the interface ov_open_callback is not usable because the OggVorbis_File *vf must point to something in the target architecture (ARM) whereas the caller cannot do that. As

Hey guys, I wrote to this list previously, saying I needed a perl module to do Ogg Vorbis tag reading / writing. People pretty much pointed me to the Ogg::Vorbis module that wrapped around libvorbisfile and I should extend that to writing streams, not only reading them. Well, awright, I thought, let's do it. Problem is, though: The download links on freshmeat are all broken and I don't

Hey guys, I wrote to this list previously, saying I needed a perl module to do Ogg Vorbis tag reading / writing. People pretty much pointed me to the Ogg::Vorbis module that wrapped around libvorbisfile and I should extend that to writing streams, not only reading them. Well, awright, I thought, let's do it. Problem is, though: The download links on freshmeat are all broken and I don't

As far as I could find, nowhere in the documentation or even source does it actually explain how to use vorbiscomment. Just a simple "vorbiscomment reads TAG=VALUE pairs on separate lines from stdin" would save people a lot of time. Of course, this is still a painful tool to use, and since I had some .ogg's lying around with broken comments (from my first ogg vorbis patch to grip),

Hello all. I'm new to this list. I'm also new to coding with libvorbis and things, so please bear with me. :) I've been having trouble with libvorbisfile. My use of it is fairly simple, but when I try to ov_clear the vorbis file, it segfaults. I can attach or otherwise make availible some demo source code, but for now I'll just pull out relevant lines: //BEGIN PSEUDO CODE

Hi, In my application I am JITing thousands of functions, though I am doing it sequantially and running only one at a time. So it is crucial to be able to properly clean up the memory from an old JITed function when JITing and running the new one. I am using Haskell binding of LLVM and my application works OK. However, memory usage increases and never decreases during the run time of my

Hi Kirill, Don't forget to add X86TargetMachine.obj (add to Additional Dependencies in Linker options, if you are using MSVS) otherwise LLVM will try and use Interpreter instead of JIT. Hope this helps, Rob. > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of kirill havok > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008

kirill havok wrote: > Hi Gordon, > I wrote a small example, but while running I get an error("Tied to > execute an unknown external function"), where I am wrong? > I think the problem is that some_test_func() is a C++ function, so its name is being mangled during compilation. To fix it, I think you want to add a declaration telling the compiler to treat some_test_func()

Reid Spencer, thank you for your quick responce, finally i got to my PC at home. You wrote: > Attached are three files: "valery.cpp" which contains your original, > "reid.cpp" which contains corrections to most of the FIXME items and > "diffs" which shows the differences between them. The differences > should be instructive on what to do. You were

Hi, Was this ever resolved? I'm curious, I'm also in a situation where there may be many (very many) JITted functions over the history of an application (which may be running for many days) Thanks On Mar 20, 2009, at 7:34 AM, George Giorgidze wrote: > Hi, > > In my application I am JITing thousands of functions, though I am > doing it sequantially and running only

Hi Gordon, I wrote a small example, but while running I get an error("Tied to execute an unknown external function"), where I am wrong? Thanks in advance. Kirill. int some_test_func( int ){ std::cout << "!!!!" << std::endl; return 8848; } int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]){ Module *M = new Module("test"); ExistingModuleProvider* MP = new

Valery, Attached are three files: "valery.cpp" which contains your original, "reid.cpp" which contains corrections to most of the FIXME items and "diffs" which shows the differences between them. The differences should be instructive on what to do. You were really, really close .. just a few details changing. The code in "reid.cpp" compiles but I

Hi, I wrote a Processing.org library based on Cortado. Maybe the Cortado developers are interested in it. At the end of November I sent a question to this list asking about the licensing of Cortado and its libraries (see http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora-dev/2009-November/004015.html). As I wanted to create a LGPL library, I rewrote the package com.fluendo.utils, I don't use

Valery, First response of several. I don't know why the demo page at UIUC is unavailable but there is an enhanced copy of it running on the mirror at http://llvm.x10sys.com/demo/ if you ever need it. Running it produced the following LLVM equivalent for the C code in your example. implementation ; Functions: int %add1(int %x) { entry: %tmp.1 = add int %x, 1 ; <int> [#uses=1]

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > Attached are three files: "valery.cpp" which contains your original, "reid.cpp" > which contains corrections to most of the FIXME items and "diffs" which shows > the differences between them. The differences should be instructive on what to > do. You were really, really close .. just a few details changing. The

> If it's that slow, you're probably getting the interpreter instead of the > JIT. Try adding -print-machineinstr to the command line, or -debug, and > see what happens. If you're not getting the JIT, try stepping through the > LLVM program to see where it makes the execution engine and decides which > one to use... (thanks for quick reply) hm, here is the part of my

Hi! I've started looking porting our application which uses LLVM JIT to using LLVM 9 (9.0.1). To begin, I tried running the HowToUseJIT.cpp (example directory) program and it fails with a segfault: ./HowToUseJIT We just constructed this LLVM module: ; ModuleID = 'test' source_filename = "test" Running foo: Segmentation fault (core dumped) Running it through GDB:

Hi, This mozilla bug report is a crash triggered by a Vorbis file with corrupt headers: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481601 The patch to fix the crash adds a new vorbis_dsp_init() function to libvorbis, and calls that from fs_vorbis_init() in libfishsound: https://bug481601.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=366150 The public function it adds is: void

I'm considering patching my copy of ogg123 to support vorbisgain tags. Is there any interest in folding this sort of patch into the main line ogg123? Has anyone done this already (or to another command line ogg player)? John --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to

Hello - I have two files which play back in VLC correctly. They were encoded using this command: ffmpeg -y -i '/tmp/2e905b981d30324f9a0664cbabb3f59a20170406-21128-r0neh9.wav' -acodec libvorbis '/tmp/2e905b981d30324f9a0664cbabb3f59a20170406-21128-r0neh920170406-21128-146yyex.ogg However ov_pcm_total reports a zero length for one of the two files. Is this a problem with my use of the