similar to: ultra-low bitrate stream?

hi folks, in my (unlucky) first test of ogg vs other encoders, i found a case where wma and mp3pro sound much better than ogg at 64k. can anyone suggest a setting that i haven't tried yet that can rival the wma and mp3pro samples at 64k? it's the "gravel effect" that is troublesome. the part in question is the first 15 seconds of this wave file:

hello all! After having read http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/listen.html and listened to the examples on that very educational page, I decided to augment the info. This example is more simple, it involves the comparision between two streams of the same radio station, FranceInter (a station of Radio France in Paris). The ogg stream is running at around 30 kbps/11 kHz in stereo. The WMA stream

Hola a todos, Estoy iniciandome en R y la verdad es que aun estoy muy muy verde.... Estoy intentando clasificar unos datos con support vector machines, pero me da fallo al usar la funcion predict. El código que uso es el siguiente: calibrate<-read.table("calibration.txt", header=TRUE) calibrate$calibration<-as.factor(calibrate$calibration)

> From: Jack Moffitt [mailto:jack@icecast.org] > > So in the very near future, I don't think that there will be any > non-vorbis capable players. And for the most part, I think Vorbis will > be included in most players, though I have little hope that Microsoft > will allow Vorbis to stand side-by-side with WMA. There is a big difference between having a codec available for

Hello everyone. I would like to know which are the available bitrate using the ultra-wideband compression. Thank you! Paolo Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A. ================================================ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you

The latest updates to CentOS 5.5 seem to have broken the Java plugin, and have defeated any and all attempts to get it working again. I'm running CentOS 5.5 (32-bit) and Firefox 3.6.9 (installed from the CentOS repository); I've tried BOTH the openJDK plugin available through the Argeo repositories, and installing Java 1.6.0 directly from Sun/Oracle and creating the plugin soft link in

Hi All I am having 2 very long character strings (550chars) and I want to put them as expressions together with c(). The problem is that I also get these double-quotes, as seen below in 'fct'. How can I remove these double-quotes? I tried as.name() but it did not work (because of size?). These are creating trouble with subsequent programs, which I tested with strings that for some

Monty wanted some samples with which to compare Vorbis and WMA, and he doesn't have a Win32 machine, so I made some. Microsoft has made their own demo samples available at: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/en/WM8/audio.asp I took their original .wav's, and encoded them with their wma8 encoder utility (WM8EUTIL.EXE), using all of the available stereo modes at 44.1kHz. This

Hi: I have been curious as to Vorbis' performance at -q0 for some time now. When RC3 came out, I used a track I have here and encoded it at q0 at 11.025, 16, 22.05, 32 and 44.1khz, both in stereo and in mono. After having heard the great sound of -q 0 in stereo, I thought I'd see what bitrate I got with -q0 in mono. I was disturbed to discover that the resulting file was 9.5kbps higher

Hi, Dan I add "not" instruction support in PTXInstrInfo.td as you suggested before. multiclass PTX_LOGIC_2OP<string opcstr,PatFrag opnode> { ... } Now I am trying to write test case for logic and shift operations. But I have a trouble in mapping LLVM IR to PTX IR for "not" instruction. The test case I wrote is, define ptx_device i16 @t4_u16(i16 %x) { ; CHECK:

Hey y'all -- I heard some discussion a while back about "bitrate stripping" to reduce filesize without re-encoding ... has this gone anywhere? Too lazy to write a re-encode script, Nate <p> --- nate - nmt2002@columbia.edu cell=917 445 6830 aim=mediumnate abolishthe.us/gpgpublickey Nobody for president. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg

On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, John Griffiths wrote: > ok so 24kbps for 56k modems... > > can i go any lower and get the 28 k modems? (still a lot of them about) or will 24 be good enough fo that? As others have said, 16kbps should do the trick. Keep in mind though that the quality of the sound will also depend on the sampling rate. MP3 will handle some higher sampling rates higher than some of

dear vorbis developers, it would be very useful, if oggenc would support constant low-bandwith bitrates for testing. something from 20kbps to 44kbps, so anyone could test streaming over modem and isdn. audio quality doesn't matter. mörk --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to

I downloaded libogg-1.1.2 and libvorbis-1.1.0, and want to compile them using mingw32. In libogg-1.1.2 directory, 'sh configure --prefix=/mingw' and 'make' and 'make install' works smoothly. It create libogg.a, ligogg.dll.a, libogg.la in my /mingw/lib and header files in /mingw/include/ogg, so I think the gcc compiler will find them easily. After switching to

Hi All, I am planning to implement Ogg Vorbis Decoder on a 24 bit DSP. I have following doubts: 1) What is min and max bitrate? 2)What is max Audio Packet size ? 3)What is the max size of setup header? 4)Any idea how to start for making a 24Bit fixed point reference code? Shall I start with floating point or Tremor or Tremor Low Mem Version? 5) What window sizes in Ogg Vorbis are normally

I noticed the "XXX: what should this be?" w.r.t. COPY_SIZE in sftp-client.c. I made up the following quick patch to allow a new command-line argument, "-B" (for 'buffer' size) to specify this value. I haven't done any strict benchmarking yet, but -B65535 is faster than -B8192 which is much faster than -B16. PS again, I am not on this list, so please CC me any

Hello, We found a problem that we are not sure who is responsible. Here is what we found: On some small file (around 1 sec) if we ask to compress the file at 128kb/s On an encoder compiled with Microsoft visual 7.1 it generate a file at 160kb/s (that is the behaviour we expect because of the short length of the file) On same encoder compiled with Microsoft visual 8.0 with the same parameter it

Hi, all. I'm new to this list, and I know that my question touches on a FAQ. I'm just hoping to get more information than "it's a priority item, but it's not done yet." (Basically what the FAQ says.) I've been encoding about 20 minutes of mono audio each week to as small a file as I can, so it can be served via html. As long as the result is understandable,

Depending on what you are broadcasting, for 28.8 I would go 16kbps and be really safe... Lithium ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Griffiths" <john@capmon.com> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Cc: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:12 PM Subject: [icecast] bitrate for slow modems > ok so 24kbps for 56k modems... > > can i go any lower and get

Hi all, I'm running CentOS 5.5 Final, Java version "1.6.0_17" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.7.5) (rhel-1.16.b17.el5-x86_64) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode) installed via Yum. We have a java application, packaged as a jar, running on our servers which, periodically, crawls RSS feeds and writes the articles to a database. Randomly, and seemingly