similar to: Performance of low quality / low sample rate

Will oggenc have a lowpass switch? I would prefer to lowpass at 15-16khz at -q3 for use with FM broadcasting. The additional frequencies would be chopped off anyway by the transmiters hardware lowpass filter so the encoder could use the addition bits for other purposes. It could be enforced that the lowpass can only be reduced and not increased from the default. This would stop people

Hey guys. I think Vorbis is pretty cool, but since the current OggEnc only offers 44.1kHz, it limits what I wanted to use it for. So I've been using Lame to get 16kHz mono Vorbis files. I'm curious about whether Lame does Vorbis encoding the "right" way for non-44.1k stuff, or whether it just encodes as it would for 44.1k & changes the sample rate on the output, but I'm

I would very much like a lowpass option because for FM radio broadcasting I don't want to encode frequencies above 15khz. I'm waiting for this option before switching to ogg from mp3(lame). Ross. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-vorbis@xiph.org [mailto:owner-vorbis@xiph.org]On Behalf Of > Gian-Carlo Pascutto > Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2001 01:46 > To:

As a matter of interest I tested the quality at -1 which has a nominal bitrate of 45 but the 2 tracks I encoded both averaged out to exactly 48kb/s. I noticed the lowpass defaulted to 15.1khz like -q0 so that may need addressing at some stage. I used a lowpass of 13khz which overall sounded better with less artifacts. I found it sharper & clearer than a lame encoded mp3 encoded with

Oops, CTRL+Enter send strikes again ... At the other end for playback you can convert it back to 48000 (or whatever) by repeating each sample 3 times (48/16 == 3), then running a 8000Hz lowpass over the result to remove any aliasing artifacts. Cheers, David Hogan > -----Original Message----- > From: David Hogan > Sent: Tuesday, 12 December 2006 10:44 AM > To:

I mentioned many months back that I intend to switch to Ogg/Vorbis from MP3/LAME once the final version is out but I need to have an adjustable lowpass filter option similar to LAME's. If this isn't done yet, could you please add it to your list for OggEnc. Specifically I need to cut all frequencies above 17khz. Thanks, Ross. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/

Hello, I was wondering about the lowpass filter applied at the different quality levels. It seems that the 16kHz cut-off is still there at quality 3. I didn't really abx it, so maybe my mind plays tricks on me. :) Please can someone enlighten me what is used for -q0, -q1 and so on. (lame tells me whats used when encoding tracks) I know I shouldn't judge by bandwidth but I would like to

A while ago someone asked about a low-pass filter for oggenc and was told to get AFsp and filter outside of Oggenc. Well, I got it, and am totally lost (It's way more complicated than SOX) so now can anyone briefly describe what type of filter I should set up (FIR, IIR, all-pole), why one is better than the other, and if you have filter coefficient files lying around (lowpass, 19 or 20 kHz

Hi, I'm no DSP or audio expert by any means, but I can share what works for me. People in the know, I would appreciate tips on whether this stuff is ok. You could sample at 32000Hz (or 48000Hz, any AC97 card will support this), run a 8000Hz lowpass filter over the data (16000Hz sample rate can only represent frequencies up to 8000Hz) and then drop every second (or 2 out of 3 for

The following behavior began about a day ago. NO changes have been made to the Fedora 20 (Heizenbug) system on which these things run. For no obvious or accountable reason, EZStream has stopped streaming. Here's a copy of the output from the ezstream command itself: # ezstream -c "/home/admin/ezstream/dn.xml" ezstream: Connected to http://localhost:8000/broadband ezstream: Streaming

Back in the day, when I was still using LAME, I was aware of the fact that the program would cut off frequencies above a certain level (lowpass). With 192 kbps this was usually around 20Khz (which is the highest frequency a human can hear, as far as I know), and at 128 something like 16Khz. Does Vorbis do something similar? If so, does someone have a chart of the cutoffs at the different quality

Is anyone can help me with this ? I'm really desperate. Thx in ad. From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ikka - Mitra Kreasindo Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 5:02 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [asterisk-users] Mixmonitor command parameter problem on

Thanks for the answers Benjamin? On Jun 14, 2013, at 8:05 PMEDT, Benjamin Schwartz wrote: > I have flexibility in the frame sizes of the unencoded audio, and packet sizes on the RF link. > > This implies that you don't have a very tight latency constraint, so you can afford to run a resampler. > I assume the resample costs CPU cycles? the RX is battery powered, I'd just as

> As the thing is to encode for human ears (AFAIK), I'd say that 4kHz is already "quite high", > and I wonder who can actually hear pure 20kHz sine. If you read the beginning of RFC 6716, you learn that Opus never encodes any frequencies that are higher than 20 kHz. So at some medium or high bitrates, anything above 20 kHz is filtered out, not because of the bitrate but

Hi, recently I made some test with the opus tools (enc and dec) and I'm very (and positively) surprised about the resultant quality. But the only think that I miss is the ability to change the low pass filter frequency via "--lowpass" option or similar. For example at a quality or 96 kbps the cut off of the filter starts at 16Khz and is completely cut at 20 Khz. But in case of

Hi, I just wanted to know if there are any recommendations for pre-/post-processing (processing power isn't a question). I'm aiming at 16kHz and tried an lowpass-filter at 11kHz before encoding but this didn't improve the results... <p>Regards, Thomas --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe

Yea, I figured it out...brain fart on my part. Got it working, but getting some sort of TCPSocket error now... still trying. :) [root@jabez etc]# darkice -c /usr/local/etc/darkice.cfg DarkIce 0.6 live audio streamer, http://darkice.sourceforge.net Copyright (c) 2000-2001, Tyrell Hungary, http://tyrell.hu Using config file: /usr/local/etc/darkice.cfg Using POSIX real-time scheduling, priority

Hey, I've compiled DarkIce 0.6 dynamically linked to LAME 3.89. I'm running Slackware 8 and using gcc 2.95.3. Running DarkIce yields the following output: DarkIce 0.5 live audio streamer, http://darkice.sourceforge.net Copyright (c) 2000-2001, Tyrell Hungary, http://tyrell.hu Using config file: darkice.cfg Using POSIX real-time scheduling, priority 98 LAME version 3.89 (beta

I am trying to understand how to fit an ARMAX model with the arima function from the stats package. I tried the simple data below, where the time series (vector x) is generated by filtering a step function (vector u, the exogenous signal) through a lowpass filter with AR coefficient equal to 0.8. The input gain is 0.3 and there is a 0.01 normal white noise added to the output: x <- u

Don't know if anybody is still missing the lame oggenc features for resampling, lowpass/highpass filters etc, but I wrote a little script that uses sox to do all the stuff I need to real-time encode oggenc from the radio, or any input device. #!/bin/bash DATE=`date '+%m-%d-%Y-(%H.%M)'` DESTIN=/video/music/perftoday export DATE=$DATE'-PerformanceToday.ogg' sox -V -r 44100 -c