similar to: default quality settings...

can someone email me a list of special spots in quality settings, or point me to a website that tells these settings? i know i may be confusing, i'm talking about like the jump between -q4.99 and -q5 because of the whole lossy/lossless channel coupling, and filesize jump...i also know somewhere above there there is different high and low frequency cutoffs, and a point where there IS NO

This mail depends upon the fact that I don't have a couple of good earphones ;-) I read in the site that q=6 is a very high quality, but does it contain perceivable differencies from the original? (for 95% of people, of course). I also found q=6 to produce files slightly bigger (1/10 bigger) than those produced with lame VBR q=2 (about 192 bps on average). I always thought LAME VBR q=2

Hello! First of all, 100x thanks to Monty and colleagues: you have done an excellent job! I just didn't believe my ears when I first tested Oggenc 1.0 at q0 to q1 - it sounds AMAZINGLY GOOD !!! But as HDD drives are getting larger and cheaper, most of us move toward higher quality settings ......... I use q8, because: - I was able to ABX some test samples up to q4.99 - at q8 Ogg is still

Hello all, I'm testing the Speex codec for my diploma thesis on a BF-533 Blackfin under uCLinux (2005R3 RC3 release). I successfully compiled the Speex (1.1.11-svn) and I can encode/decode wav-files on my STAMP-board using the speexenc/speexdec sample apps. But I encountered that the decoded file sounds strange/noisy, when compiling with "--enable-blackfin-asm" +

Hi all, I just came across the following page: http://r3mix.net In the "News" section there is a fairly negative critique of Vorbis; especially it is mentioned that Vorbis "has terrible masking problems". There is also a Vorbis-encoded frequency sweep which shows strong deficiencies at high frequencies, but I suppose this is due to the quite low bitrate of the distributed

Hi, I'm using Sweave to prepare a descriptive report. Are at least 20 tables built with xtable command of kind: <<echo=F, results=hide>>= q5 = factor(Q5, label=c("N?o", "Sim")) (q5.tab = cbind(table(q5))) @ <<echo=F, results=tex>>= xtable(q5.tab, align="l|c", caption.placement = "top", table.placement='H') @ I'm

Hi, I have a question about how to obtain the union of several data frame rows. I'm trying to create a common key for several tests composed of different items. Here is a small scale version of the problem. These are keys for 4 different tests, not all mutually exclusive: id q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 1 A C 2 B D 3 A D B 4 C D B D I would like

Hi R-people, I have a question about lattice in general, and histogram specfically. How do you control the ordering of factors that controls the placement of the conditional panels. I have a dataset with factors that go 'Q1','Q2',"Q3','Q5' and of course I want the plot to place Question Q1 at the top and Question Q5 at the bottom of the graphical output.

hi have problems to get an samba server up that offers shares for all without a password heres my smb.conf file located under /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf [global] netbios name = DEATHB server string = Samba %v on (%L) workgroup = LANSTRIKE encrypt passwords = yes security = share [homes] browseable = no [mp3] comment = lmh path = /var/glftpd/site/mp3/lame.r3mix/ browseable = yes read only =

----- Original Message ----- From: "Silvano" <silvano at uel.br> To: <r-help at r-project.org> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 9:07 AM Subject: Tables and merge > Hi, > > I have 21 files which is common variable CODE. > Each file refers to a question. > > I would like to join the 21 files into one, to construct > tables for each question by CODE. >

Hello everyone, ff123 compiled Monty's branch of the RC1 encoder, see his post on r3mix.net forum: http://66.96.216.160/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?board=c&action=display&num=994299736&start=30 Anyway it only supports ~128kbps mode, so I did a quick listening test with some files that bugged vorbis beta4. grace.wav - the right channel is still a bit watery, and I think this can be seen

I am sure this is trivial, but I cannot solve it. I make a histogram. There are 5 categories "1",...,"5" and 80 values and the histogram does not evenly space the bars. Bars "1" and "2" have no space between them and the rest are evenly spaced. How can I get all bars evenly spaced? The code: > Q5 [1] "4" "4" "4"

In light of the recent study - http://www.airwindows.com/encoders/index.html - posted at slashdot, I've come to realize how little I know about this whole field. So, I'm making an appeal to the audio experts here. I want 'jukebox' quality, meaning ~0 artifacts while maintaining a good compression ratio, but not quite 'archival' (read high bitrate) as I don't mind

Hi all, ########################################## dof=c(1,2,4,8,16,32) Q5=matrix(rt(100,dof),100,6,T,dimnames=list(NULL,dof)) par(mfrow=c(2,6)) apply(Q5,2,hist) myf=function(x){ qqnorm(x);qqline(x) } apply(Q5,2,myf) ########################################## These looks ok. However, I would like to achieve more. Apart from using a loop, is there are fast way to 'add' the titles to be

R- Help Forum Working with the "likert" package and I can't figure out why my "bar" graphs are backwards (see attached). The percentages are place correctly but the bars are backwards. #Sample code # libraries library(likert) # create data band <- c("Band 3","Band 3","Band 3","Band 3","Band 3","Band

Howdy folks, currently i am using a cygwin32 build of all tools on NT here at work. most of my cd's are ripped to ogg files, but my mp3diskman is.. well an mp3 player. (http://www.soul.com.hk Its a nice player!) i use: ogg123.exe -d raw -f - "filename.ogg" | lame --r3mix -r - filename.mp3 Is there a better way of doing this, for instance passing the tags through as well? I am

any suggestions on the following gratefully welcome, I have a dataframe, which I am subsetting via labels atpi[, creativity] where (for example) atpi = as.data.frame(matrix(1:50, ncol = 5, nrow = 10)) names(atpi) = c("Q1", "Q2", "Q3", "Q4", "Q5") and creativity = c("Q1", "Q3", "Q4") I want to add an extra column

Hi, I have got this start situation: structure(list(subject = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L), .Label = c("s1", "s2"), class = "factor"), part = structure(c(1L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 6L, 6L), .Label = c("p1", "p2", "p3", "p4", "p5", "p9"), class =

Yes, r3mix found a bug, no it's not a serious one. It's amazing how something small gets overblown like this. The r3mix reviewer basically just hit the known short block trigger bug when doing his tests. We've known about this bug since before the beta and haven't fixed it yet because it was considered relatively minor; [ironically] it mostly affects test samples with a single

In looking at the code in ARMConstantislandPass.cpp::optimizeThumb2JumpTables(), I see that there is the following condition for not creating tbb-based jump tables: // The instruction should be a tLEApcrel or t2LEApcrelJT; we want // to delete it as well. MachineInstr *LeaMI = PrevI; if ((LeaMI->getOpcode() != ARM::tLEApcrelJT &&