similar to: ATTENTION Re: Multichannel files

Hi, As I´ve understood things, the Ogg Vorbis format supports more that two channels (stereo). Is there any tools to encode x sourcefiles into one .ogg file? I am a musican and am thrilled with the ide of makeing music in surround (or in more than stereo). This leads to my next question: is there (developing) any decoders for multichannel oggs to, let us say, 4.1 or 5.1 surround? Wouldn´t it

Jared (jared@celab21.students.csee.uq.edu.au) wrote : > Saw an article today on /. which reports that Dolby are insisting the > NETBSD dudes remove the ac3dec package from their site. Someone suggested > that we need an open source solution. ac3dec is already open ( GPL ). > Could Vorbis in the Ogg framework be this solution, can we create a pretty > simple 5.1 stream? I

Hello to the list, and please forgive me if this has already been asked before. (I am new here, you see) The question is really simple: Can I use FLAC to create multichannel files, ranging from 3-channel LCR, through Quad, 4.1 to 5.1 and possibly (later) above? The projects details are essentially this: DVD-Audio, containing MLP Lossless in stereo & surround/multichannel. Video_TS folder

Hi, Has anyone thought about using the multichannel format as a way of distributing "musician minus one" files? Eh? I hear you ask. Ok. Basically these are multitrack files but you can mute the solo track so you, the musician, can practice against the other "players". You can buy CD's of this nature, but of course, the solo instrument is on one channel and the others on

Hi. I have two CDs that the artists inteded for simultaneous listening. They even provide instructions on how to start two CD players with the minimal time shift. (for those interested - the CDs are Neurosis/Times Of Grace and Tribes Of Neurot/Grace) I've heard that Vorbis can encode multiple streams. I've already encoded both albums into regular 2-channel .ogg files. The questions

> > So > > it's closer to Dolby AC-X than to VQ. Unfortunately, I'm not sure that it's > > not patended by Dolby. > > Could you be more specific? More than anything else, we need to know more > about the patent waters we're navigating. > > Monty As Dolby AC-X is using enveloppe of the sound since several years, and as it seems that Dolby was

I have been looking for analog phones for my * system that work with our plantronic amplifiers and headsets. The problem I am having with the Aastra phones that I have purchased (PT-390, 9116, 9120, 8009 ), is that they don't seem to stay hung up unless you physically hang up the handset everytime you finish a call. I have even purchased the Aastra 9120 which sais it has on-hook

I quote from "Principles of Digital Audio" by Ken C. Pohlmann: "Because perceptual coders tailor the coded signal to the ear's acuity, they similarly tailor the required response of the playback system itself. Live music does not pass through amplifiers and loudspeakers, it goes directly to the ear. But recorded music must pass through the playback signal chain. Much of the

Hi there ! I checked Vorbis' performace for mono files at approx. 64-80 kbps (it does a good job) and I'm wondering why the current OggEnc still uses Point-Stereo (>10kHz) for -q4 and -q5 I know, we're usually unable to percieve those phase correlations above 10 kHz, But a Dolby Prologic Decoder isn't. I think a future version of OggEnc which is able to use a user-selectable

What rigs do you folks use to listen to your music? I have a P-III 500 with Altec Lansing speakers in the dining room and a P-II 350 with Labtec speakers in the Guestroom/office. Sorry, I can't remember what model the Lansings are off the top of my head. The Labtec speakers are fairly cheap. I have a PCI ensonique sound card in the P-III system. I not sure what kind of sound card is in the

On 20030610: Gregory Maxwell wrote: (in reply to Ralph Giles) >> I assume you're aware of the technical documentation on dolby's site? >> (http://www.dolby.com/pro/) In particular the surround mixing guide has >> a lot of detailed guidelines. I don't have any practical experience >> with it though, so I can't vouch for it. >Yes I am. I've done a

Arc wrote: > Ok so we cap it to 64bit, since much more than that doesn't make sense (96bit > would be a "long double" C type) On x86 CPUs, "long double" is 80 bits. > I really don't like this idea, but I will entertain, formatting it as follows: > > ID Type Bits > 0 Int 8 > 1 uInt 8 > 2 Int 16 > 3 Int 24 > 4 Int

First: I am not a lawyer, this is no legal advice! On 16 May 2017, at 0:25, Robert Jeffares wrote: > Jack, > > I am using AAC+ encoded by Darkice and distributed on Icecast2 on a > Ubuntu server. I had to install a number of open source libraries and > compile darkice from source. No licence. This sounds like it would violate the license, given that the FAQ on

As far as I know, LAME is able to mantain the informations stored in some audio files in the lower frequencies, useful for a Dolby pro logic decoder to reproduce a surround sound. Is ogg able to do it? Olaf <olaf@ kjws.com> for every kind of mail, except spam! :-) --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe

It's really pretty simple. You can download the code and build it all you want... ...for yourself. It cannot be distributed, sold, or used commercially in any way. That's all. /g. -----Original Message----- From: Icecast [mailto:icecast-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of Robert Jeffares Sent: Tuesday, 16 May, 2017 17:03 To: icecast at xiph.org Subject: Re: [Icecast] Frauenhofer signing

Hi everyone, Over the last two weeks or so, I've been thinking about how to add surround sound to Ogg -- and more than that, to do it in the best way possible. With this in mind, I started considering using Ambisonic surround sound. The advantages of this format are considerable: a) It was developed in the early to mid '70s, so the patents should be expired by now.

Hi, are there any plans for FLAC to implement spatial audio? Or maybe Atmos on FLAC? renatas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20170810/57a79181/attachment.html>

Hi folks, I'm trying to get a handle on the many lossless audio formats from the perspective of a software developer. I love the FLAC format because it is open source and it performs very well. But there is also the MLP (Meridian Lossless Packing), AAC (Apple Lossless), and probably some Microsoft format(s) that compete in the same feature set. These formats all achieve

On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Niko Mattheus wrote: > Will icecast stream to chromecast normaly? I have several onkyo amplifiers with chromecast build in which no accepting the stream. > Also tunein on a telephone will not stream to a chromecast device saying the stream is not compatible What's the format of the stream? I remember years ago finding that I couldn't stream a 192 kbps MP3

It obviously would be nice to have such a mode available, for e.g. DVD audio compression. Apparently, the list doesn''t tell me too much about it. My questions are: 1. What is the current status of the 5.1 channel coupling in Vorbis? 2. If I''ll be interested in participation in its development, what is the recommended reading? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML