similar to: [Fwd: Interview With Huffman Aviation Casts Doubt on Official Story]

Emperors1000@aol.com wrote: > > Dear reader, > The emperorsclothes list does not seem to be working. Please forgive us if > you receive this post twice. - Jared Israel, www.tenc.net > ************************** > URL for this article: http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/rozoff/abyss.htm > > To join the Emperor's Clothes email list, go to >

Patrick Masters wrote: QUIT!!!!!!!!! NOW!!!!!!!!!!!! I am tired of this shit. -----Original Message----- From: owner-vorbis@xiph.org [mailto:owner-vorbis@xiph.org]On Behalf Of Randolph Carter Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 2:01 AM To: vorbis@xiph.org Subject: [vorbis] [Fwd: Interview With Huffman Aviation Casts Doubt on Official Story] emperors1000@aol.com wrote:

Hi Is it possible to give users a different policy? If it's not possible by default, can I do it with preexec? Wasn't there an option to let a file contain the output of a program, and each time it is read, the output is piped instead of contents of a file? Because I think that would be safer, than a preexec that replaces my policy file, because when other users log in at exactly the same

Hi All, Excited to see mention of T.38 passthru with 1.4.0.... BUT it seems like "Emperor's New Clothes" from my perspective. As I understand it, T.38 passthru only works via a re-invite mechanism - so two T.38 devices try talking fax and request a T.38 media stream. Asterisk is now savvy enough to realise it can't do it, so opts out - "Hey Guys, I don't know

Hi all, Best wishes for the new year! :'') I''m very new to Ruby and Rails, and I ran into a problem with the "paginate" function. When I use the following method to get a number of forum topics based on a category name passed via the URI: @topic_pages, @topics = paginate :topics, :joins => "INNER JOIN categories ON

I''m getting insane here. I''m running shorewall 1.3.11 with iptables 1.2.5 and freeswan 1.97 on a 2.4.18-8 kernel aka MNF. The setup is a followed: Lan (192.168.1.x) - FW (eth1 192.168.1.254 - eth0 64.x.y.71) - router 64.x.y.65 (which is default GW on eth0) -internet - 161.a.b.c (FW-1) So a windows client with checkpoint tries to connect to a vpn-1 server on the internet. The

Hi people, Version of my beloved Dovecot installation: 2.2.27 (c0f36b0) I moved from a OS X server to a Linux (Ubuntu) Headless server. All fun and good to play around with. Love almost everything. In the combination with Postfix and Dovecot I?m stuck to despair into oblivion. Everything works except I cannot send mail from my (OS X) Outlook client I keep getting: Connection to the

On Jan 20, 2013, at 10:18 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Sorry, I wasn't trying to suggest anything vague, but rather refer to my previous (perhaps ill founded) understanding about the expected path forward for LLD. Anyways, I'll explain in a bit more detail so we can talk about the concrete issue. > > My concrete hope is that LLD migrates toward the coding standards that are

>>>Those things generally happen in Amsterdam. And in Kristiania in >>>Copenhagen. The usual problem: Smoking too much pot > I have to object to that, as a rule of thumb the Dutch only rob tourists who > are dressed like tourists and act like tourists, that's what we all agreed > to here and live by -- please just dress local and act local, so we can > finally

Hi there, I need to set-up something to syncronise (say every hour) a set of ftp and config files between two servers and rsync seems to be the prog for the job (for a HA ftp server using Pro-ftp). But so far, unless i run as root, with root being able to login to both servers, it doesn't work. I get the feeling i'm getting confused with rsh and ssh setups and bits....hence an

Hello there, im having a problem with the xml handling, i want to get and xml node and put things in an input text but im a little lost, im using this code, but isn''t work, what am i doing wrong? --------------------- <a href="#" onclick="getXML()">Get XML</a> <input type="text" value="nothing here" id="respuesta" />

I am trying to run a GLMM on some binomial data. My fixed factors include 2 dichotomous variables, day, and distance. When I run the model: modelA<-glmmPQL(Leaving~Trial*Day*Dist,random=~1|Indiv,family="binomial") I get the error: iteration 1 Error in MEEM(object, conLin, control$niterEM) : Singularity in backsolve at level 0, block 1 >From looking at previous help

I'm trying to understand something that just doesn't seem to compute. How can companies like Cisco justify selling their hard phones for as much as they do? I know there is a matter of recouping R&D costs but when you look at the iPhone with all its amazing features for less than $500.00 it just doesn't make sense. Am I the only one that thinks this? Roy Anciso Director of

Let me start by saying that I am a fan of lexical scoping as a way of increasing confidence in your execution models. I am hoping to move from the now thoroughly debunked "wackyscope" model that used to plague many programming languages over to proper lexical scoping in my puppet configs. I''m just having trouble finding documentation of how this works for puppet. I understand

Nu Mcafee titles released on Jun 06 20:29:48 MSK 2007 Adobe Creative Suite CS3 269$ Adobe Photoshop CS3 89$ Symantec Norton 360 29$ Microsoft Office 2007 79$ Microsoft Vista Business 79$ Nero 7 Premium 39$ Adobe Acrobat 8 Pro 79$ Adobe Flash CS3 Pro 59$ Windows XP Pro +SP2 49$ Adobe Premiere 2.O 59$ Macromedia Studio 8 99$ 0ffice2OO3 w/Contact Mgr 69$ Quickbooks

Nu Mcafee titles released on Jun 06 20:29:48 MSK 2007 Adobe Creative Suite CS3 269$ Adobe Photoshop CS3 89$ Symantec Norton 360 29$ Microsoft Office 2007 79$ Microsoft Vista Business 79$ Nero 7 Premium 39$ Adobe Acrobat 8 Pro 79$ Adobe Flash CS3 Pro 59$ Windows XP Pro +SP2 49$ Adobe Premiere 2.O 59$ Macromedia Studio 8 99$ 0ffice2OO3 w/Contact Mgr 69$ Quickbooks

I''ve looked around for a while, but can''t seem to find any documentation stating whether it was possible to pass a hash as the value of a key in an object.. can we? e.g.: foo { "foo": fred => { "key1" => "val1", "key2" => "val2" } } this gives me errors, as does using square brackets in place of the curlies for

I''m installing puppet modules from scratch on a new machine, using the code at https://hg.koumbit.net/module-puppet/ btw. The bootstrap script grabs a few base modules (to do dvcs checkouts) from http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/CommonModules , uses the new modules to get the rest. However, the modules as checked out don''t bootstrap cleanly. The fix is simple, just

Hi I'll first describe our setup: We have two different networks, one for teachers, and one for students. They are divided from each other, except for ip traffic, and it should stay that way, because students are not allowed to reach the teacher's server... (So when using samba more, I'll have to setup a better firewall I think, and/or samba rules from which IP shares may be

On 10/21/2011 09:28 AM, Owen Anderson wrote: > Reed, > > On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Reed Kotler wrote: >> I would like to see the many adhoc parsers in LLVM get replaced by ones >> generated from grammars. > > FYI, this is very unlikely to happen. The parsers in LLVM /were/ > historically generated from grammars (bison, as I recall), and those >