similar to: a few questions

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! A question, is it possible to split a ogg-vorbis file in two parts without reencoding? I want is to make a utility to scan a vorbis file for 30seconds+ of silence, split the file to two files and call the second file "Bonus track" or something... It's annoying to have the last song of an album being 30minutes with 26 minutes of

I'm forwarding this to the vorbis list FYI. I'll also forward the reply. Marshall -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: File formats (RE: MP4 Player Available for Download) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:29:20 -0500 From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@21rst-century.com> Reply-To: tme@21rst-century.com Organization: Multicast Technologies To: philippe.gentric@philips.com CC:

Hi All, First of all, I'm sorry if my question is offtopic on this list. In such case please ignore this post and/or contact me directly. I'm asking my questions there because I feel you had similar problem before starting developing Speex. My story: my friend developed 3gpp content creator and he would distribute it in binary form. But there is problem with AMR licensing (the terms

Hi all, Please could you tell me when is planned a version of Ogg Vorbis with low bitrate encoding? I'm waiting for this feature because I want to put my music on the web. But the song is very long, about 30 mn (yes, this is progressive music). So I fear nobody will listen to it except if the bitrate is cut down. Thanks! PS: If you really want, you can listen to the masterpiece at

>RFC822 is HISTORIC: please refer to RFC2822 instead. > >While UTC is sufficient for human beings, but not necessarily accurate >for machines, because of the leap year adjustment. TAI is the You mean leap seconds, not leap years. Since 1972, UTC == TAI modulo some number of seconds. Leap Seconds are announced officially by the IERS http://www.iers.org/iers/products/eop/leap.html

> On Jun 24, 2020, at 19:17, Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:23 PM Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com <mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>> wrote: > > > On 6/24/20 11:21 AM, Matt Arsenault via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> >>> On Jun 24, 2020, at 14:13, Arthur Eubanks via

>On Tuesday, October 2, 2001, at 01:18 , Kevin Marks wrote: > >> Here you seem to imply that the packets are to do with RTP networking >> units. For DV do you use the DV RFC to decide these? Or are they >> arbitrary? You have 2 size-limited structures overlaid on each other, >> neither of which necessarily corresponds to a fundamental data unit of >> the

Does anyone have a patch or information resource on implementing POP before SMTP with sendmail and DoveCot? I implemented it using a qpopper patch before we swiched to DoveCot for Maildirs. We have been using DoveCot for almost a year now and love it better than any other IMAP or POP3 server. Thanks for the info, Doug Eubanks SIMflex Internet Support support at simflex.com SIMflex Telephone

I started testing Dovecot 1.0 Test 22! I loved the performance improvements, althought dovecot has been very fast for us from the beginning. However, now I am testing test 24 and 25, and I am seeing these errors in the dovecot log and squirrelmail is giving me a ERROR : Connection dropped by imap-server. Query: STATUS "Mailing Lists.SpamAssassin" (MESSAGES UNSEEN RECENT) This is the

Hello, I am using SquirrelMail with the 1.0 releases, and I have even backed up to the latest stable release based on 1.0. I am using MailDirs. When I delete a message, the message still shows up in the message list until either I log out and back in or a new message arrives in that folder. Any ideas? Thanks Doug Eubanks doug at simflex.com The speed of time is one-second per second.

Can you explain how to revert for someone who is a 2 on a git scale of 0 to 10? At 9/22/2020 03:51 PM, Arthur Eubanks wrote: >Yes, push whatever is needed to fix the build if the fix is fairly simple (else revert and get an LGTM with the fix). > >Next time I'd recommend creating and pushing a revert first if you can't quickly figure out the issue.

On 5/14/20 5:33 AM, Arthur Eubanks via llvm-dev wrote: > > Is it the case that with the legacy PM there is no inlining at > either -O2 or -O3 and with newPM there is? Or is there something else > going on? > Legacy PM inlines at -O2/-O3, new PM inlines at -O1/-O2/-O3. These > cases where inlining occurs also coincide with the test failure. I > agree that inlining itself

I'd just note that not every pass you can run with "opt" is actually part of the optimization pipeline. There are a few important IR-level passes that only run in the codegen pipeline, but are still nameable with opt to run individually for testing purposes. Switching over doesn't need to block on these passes being migrated. So I'm not sure this method of determining

Hmm it looks like getting NPM to work with opt is non-trivial. Only a small portion of the opt functionality works with NPM :( On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:36 PM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > Maybe you could change the default PM in opt and see what fails? > > --paulr > > > > *From:* Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks at google.com> > *Sent:* Monday,

I recall reading that all MPEG AAC software has different and incompatible file formats , because this is a condition set by the MPEG AAC technology licensing authority. Some kind of yet-another-anti-piracy-measure, the idea probably being that users of different software can not swap their files. I picked up this a while ago when following AAC software development, but can't remember exactly

On 5/13/20 3:31 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote: > I believe it's meant to run after /some/ optimizations to make it a bit > more efficient, while not so optimized that it misses opportunities to > detect bugs - but I could be wrong there. I'll leave it up to other folks > to chime in. I think that is right. The more transformations you run the more UB you can also

Sanitizer passes really should not run before the inliner. For example, ASan moves all allocas into a "mega-alloca" to obtain fixed frame layout for reporting purposes. It also inserts a fake stack check in the function prologue which will get duplicated (but will probably still work) after inlining. MSan removes readnone/readonly from all functions because they all update shadow which

Here in the uk, to get a patent on anything, you have to prove that the patent is not obvious and that there is no prior art. If there is prior art, then a patent cannot be given, this is why people patenting stuff have to keep it a secret until they actually have the patent, otherwise it is considered to have been released into the public domain. Once something is in the public domain, nobody

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:59 AM Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 7:48 PM Arthur Eubanks via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > After talking with some NPM people, I believe the ultimate goal after > NPM is enabled by default is to only support `-passes=`, and remove support > for `-foo-pass`. > Hm,

Hi, First, I want to say that I have fallen in love with CentOS4. I have been using RedHat since the 5.x days. After RedHat dropped the stable system to go to a unstable system and a Enterprise system I felt like I was being left out in the cold. I quickly found out about WhiteBox and used it for quite a while. Then I learned about CentOS...and switched to it for my server needs. I have