Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "DOS commandline decoder for Ogg beta4?"
2001 Aug 23
3
RC2 vs. beta4 (test)
Hi!
I would like to share with you an interesting test result.
I re-encoded a song 10 times (the 2. made from the 1.,
the 3. made from the 2.,... the 10. made from the 9.),
with a beta4 (CVS 20010620)
and with an RC2 (CVS 20010817) library version,
256 kbit/s mode, channel coupling disabled at RC2.
The beta4 is very good at the 10. encoding too,
but the RC2 has some interesting quality bugs.
So,
2001 Jun 28
2
OGG commandline decoder
Is there any Ogg-Vorbis command-line decoder for Windows (or DOS)?
--
Jernej Simoncic, jernej.simoncic@guest.arnes.si
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
ICQ: 26266467
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word
2001 Jun 06
1
Vorbis under DJGPP (was: DOS commandline decoder for Ogg beta4)
Ever considered creating make files for the Mingw?
I've wanted to see if it worked with Ming but I've never
had the chance to do so since I imagine it might also
require some revisions to the code. (I'm not so hot at
programming anyway.)
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a
2003 Apr 05
3
24 bit with ogg
Hello.
Does ogg support 24 bit wav files for encoding?
Thanks
______________________________________________________________________________
UNICEF bittet um Spenden fur die Kinder im Irak! Hier online an
UNICEF spenden: https://spenden.web.de/unicef/special/?mc=021101
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from
2002 Jul 12
8
Uncoupled mode?
Hello,
A question:
Can we use uncoupled encoding in the 1.0?
(current CVS)
How?
Because I see some uncoupled definitions
(books\uncoupled\res_books_uncoupled.h),
but I don't know how could I switch to it
manually.
Perhaps with an option in the
vorbis_encode_ctl() function...
Because I think so it's better if I don't
use any kind of channel coupling (lossless
neither) on high bitrates
2001 Jul 04
2
windows binary (snapshot)
does anyone compiled a oggenc windows binary from the cvs sources?
please send it to me :)
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the
2000 Nov 29
2
comparison of beta2 and beta3 encoder quality
Hi,
I encoded some songs into 350 kbit/s with beta2 and beta3 too,
and I don't know why, but it seems the b2 sounds better (makes a
better quality ogg file)...
The b2 contains more the b3 contains less high sounds.
And with the b3, the size of file is smaller with 4-5%...
Do you know this problem, or do you think so, that the sound quality
is good (or better in the b3) ??
Please be carefull
2001 Aug 20
4
Batch-Tagging oggs?
Hello all.
Quick question ('Cause I'm famished and have to get something to eat)
If I have a batch of files (wave and/or ogg) with a certain naming scheme.
Would it be possible for me to write a small nifty (newbie) dos-batch
program that could tag those ogg-files (or encode the waves with tags) with
regards to the namin parameters.
Let me clarify. I usually encode waves with the
2001 Aug 15
10
RC2 worse than RC1 and Beta4
After doing an informal (128k) listening test, I have concluded that I
prefer Beta4 over RC2.
The 16kHz low-pass on the RC2 encoder makes it sound like FM radio. Both
encoders SEEM to have a couple of dB bump at 10kHz.
JT
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
2002 Nov 02
4
FAQ : CPU requirements ? and other
Hi!
<p>First the question "How fast are the encoders/decoders?" ( quoted
below ) in the FAQ ( http://www.vorbis.com/faq.psp ) should be
updated to include v1.0. What is the phrase "most commercial audio
encoders" referring to ? commercial vorbis encoders ?
Quote :
--begin quote---
How fast are the encoders/decoders?
Right now the encoder is about as fast as most
2000 Dec 25
2
Modification requests / question
Hello!
1.
You should modify the 'vorbis_ftoi(f)' for the undefinied OS/compiler
in the 'os.h' on this way:
old:
static int vorbis_ftoi(double f){
return (int)(f+.5);
}
new:
#define vorbis_ftoi(f) ((int)(f+.5f))
Because in some cases we don't use this function, and the compiler writes
many error messages.
2. Could you write a frequency and bitrate independent
2009 Mar 25
2
v1.2.beta4 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz.sig
This release fixes a memory corruption bug related to MODSEQ handling in
earlier v1.2 releases. Memory corruption means that it's a security bug
and possibly exploitable. MODSEQ code is new in v1.2, so v1.1 and older
releases are not affected.
Other than that, there
2009 Mar 25
2
v1.2.beta4 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz.sig
This release fixes a memory corruption bug related to MODSEQ handling in
earlier v1.2 releases. Memory corruption means that it's a security bug
and possibly exploitable. MODSEQ code is new in v1.2, so v1.1 and older
releases are not affected.
Other than that, there
2007 Oct 23
4
v1.1.beta4 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta4.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta4.tar.gz.sig
Lots of fixes since beta3, but apparently there are still a few bugs
left:
- Is SORT working?
- APPEND seems to have problems in some setups.
- Still some SEARCH TEXT problems? Or Squat indexing problems?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment
2010 Mar 24
1
2.0.beta4 compile errors
I am unable to get 2.0.beta4 to compile. I get the following errors:
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-slackware-linux/4.3.3/../../../../lib64/libwrap.a(hosts_access.o):
In function `host_match':
hosts_access.c:(.text+0x625): undefined reference to `yp_get_default_domain'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [tcpwrap] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
2006 Mar 28
2
6.1-BETA4-i386-disc2.iso - only usr/share/doc, no usr/src?
Does the 6.1-BETA4-i386-disc2.iso contain only usr/share/doc, or for
some reason i am unable to see anything else? I was looking for
usr/src (and for a odd chance to have usr/ports); i suppose those
two trees would be available somewhere on some disc for RELENG_6_1.
I mounted the image as ...
mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /path/to/6.1-BETA4-i386-disc2.iso -u 0
mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /mnt
...
2010 Aug 24
1
asterisk-1.8.0-beta4 - compile error
Hi,
I tried to compile asterisk-1.8.0-beta4 but after ./configure && make
I've got following error:
[CC] res_fax.c -> res_fax.o
[LD] res_fax.o -> res_fax.so
[CC] res_fax_spandsp.c -> res_fax_spandsp.o
res_fax_spandsp.c:117: error: field ?fax_state? has incomplete type
res_fax_spandsp.c:118: error: field ?t38_state? has incomplete type
res_fax_spandsp.c: In function
2001 Aug 02
1
Encoder differences, beta4 -> 1.0rc1
Hi all,
Were there encoder differences between beta4 and 1.0rc1? A precompiled
oggenc for Windows identifies itself as beta4, and from a certain mono
file produces 53.3 kb/s files, whereas one I've compiled myself,
identifying itself as 1.0rc1, produces 55.9 kb/s. Is this a feature or
a bug?
Also, all the links to images at the top of:
http://www.vorbis.com/download_win.psp
are broken.
2003 Jan 29
0
VP3 for xine 1.0-beta4
Hi,
Some of you may recall that I got the VP3 decoder working with the
xine multimedia player some time ago and posted a patch for anyone else
to try. I really messed up when I did that since I generated the patch
against some random CVS snapshot of xine-lib. I did better this time and
generated the patch against the latest release of xine-lib (1.0-beta4,
released today).
If you
2002 Jan 18
0
Beta4 better than RC2 and RC3 ???
Hello,
I hope you won't mind if I give you mine opinion and suggestions about
Vorbis audio encoder, especially new version.
I was pretty satisfied with the quality of Beta4 encoder. For a bitrates
around 112 to 128 kb/s I consider it better then any other audio
compression formats (MP3, AAC, ...) at same bitrate. Sound quality that
this version produces with bitrates below 112 kb/s was not