similar to: Re: Re: [vorbis-dev] ACM codec

My concern is primarly the 'marketing' aspect. If UCI, or MCF, or any other interface, is adopted by the toolmakers, then that's a perfectly good solution. <p>-----Original Message----- From: Christian HJ Wiesner [mailto:christian.hj.wiesner@web.de] Sent: Tue 11/12/2002 10:10 AM To: theora-dev@xiph.org Cc: Subject: [theora-dev] Re: [vorbis-dev] ACM codec

<"Dan Miller" <dan@on2.com> wrote in message news:<20021111153459.2AF71532A73@motherfish-II.xiph.org>... <hmm -- you make a good point. However note that Divx is quite popular in spite of having gone with AVI format, so your logic doesn't hold in that case. <Frankly though I sort of agree, in that Divx would have been even more popular and cause less headaches

hmm -- you make a good point. However note that Divx is quite popular in spite of having gone with AVI format, so your logic doesn't hold in that case. Frankly though I sort of agree, in that Divx would have been even more popular and cause less headaches with a .DVX extension rather than AVI. I 100% agree that the form of the codec that should be distributed for playback is OGG. The

"Steve Lhomme" <steve.lhomme@free.fr> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:3DC06324.10800@free.fr... > Josh Coalson wrote: > > --- engdev <engdev@ozemail.com.au> wrote: > >>Hi, > >>Has there been any progress on the ACM for FLAC > >>that was being looked at by Steve Lhomme? > > Haven't heard anything here about it for a long time. >

does there exist anywhere a useful source version of an ACM for vorbis audio? I've seen the binary one somewhere in Japan, and there's an abandoned project at SourceForge, but I'm having a helluva time building it. I know all the caveats about CBR vs. VBR, ACM/AVI problems etc. but I need it anyway. Thanks in advance - ___ Dan Miller (++,) Founder, CTO, On2.com --- >8 ----

<alex@foogod.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:20020924181444.H16854@firestar.foogod.com... > Greetings all.. I'm sending this message out here because I suspect that some > folks involved in this project might be interested in the following. If this > is not the case (or this is not an appropriate forum for this sort of thing) I > apologize in advance.. >

Hi, i have the big pleasure to officially announce that the matroska multimedia container project has finally left alpha status and turned into public beta status last night. By following the links below you will be able to obtain various tools to create, edit and play matroska audio and video files on your computers. Supported Operating Systems are currently Windows and Linux, but it seems

Hi everybody, I'm currently writing a real time video conferencing tool for Windows and I want to use the Theora Library for this purpose. My questions are: 1.) is there a vfw implementation of theora 2.) if no, can I bundle the VP3 vfw codec that's available from On2's website with my application Best regards, Florian (Stuttgart, Germany)

vorbis@xiph.org wrote: >Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. >We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of >"Re: Please confirm your message". > >Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your >mailer's "Reply" feature. > > vorbis+confirm+1047633476.23331.c524c3@xiph.org >

Hi Sanjiv, There does indeed appear to be some trouble with the Javasound SPI encoder (the SPI decoder works well). I am working on it, and hope to have a fix soon. In the mean time, you can use the encoder outside of JavaSound, that one works well (see the command line encoder as example code of how to implement it). sincerely Marc Gimpel Head of research Wimba <p>On

Josh Coalson wrote: > --- engdev <engdev@ozemail.com.au> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Has there been any progress on the ACM for FLAC >>that was being looked at by Steve Lhomme? > > > Haven't heard anything here about it for a long time. Sorry, I sent my reply to engdev privately (because there's no good reply to). In short I haven't worked on

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

I'm not getting copies of it, so I don't think it's going to the entire list. Is your mailserver accepting mail, but saying it's down? Are you getting copies of other messages? I suppose this could be a result of the mailservers's moving. Can anyone else confirm that they do or do not get copies of emails every 20 minutes? If it's just you, then it will help track it

Received: from motherfish.xiph.org ([207.181.249.22]) by uis.umassp.edu (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAA7324 for <ptomb@email.umassp.edu>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:12:33 -0400 Received: by motherfish.xiph.org (Postfix) id 72E6D18D023; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 03:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: icecast-outgoing@xiph.org Received: by motherfish.xiph.org

While trying to get other work done on Motherfish-II, I couldn't help but notice that machine load was over *200*, due entirely to the viewCVS CGI. Either we were being DoSed via the cgi, or it's too inefficient to even think about using. Motherfish is a server intended for *core services only*. We've been steadily forgetting that. Core services include CVS, mail and web. They