Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "codec review"
2003 Feb 26
7
[OT] Just saying hi!
I hope this list is small enough for not beeing banned when
introducing oneself. So...
Hi,
I just subscribed to the theora-lists. I'm from the XVID project,
so I know a deal about video and MPEG-4 in particular, but nothing about
Vorbis/Theora etc., That's why I'm here, because I'm interested in
patent-free alternatives.
I guess there is no documentation of the current status
2001 Sep 09
1
VP3.2 video codec open sourced
this is slightly off topic and also it was posted to the tarkin list,
but I think many people on this list are looking for an open source
video codec. ;)
On2 released the VP3.2 video codec as open source. I didn't read the
license and could not say if it's really open source.
http://www.vp3.com
http://www.streamingmedia.com/article.asp?id=7871
--- >8 ----
List archives:
2002 Nov 11
2
Quality of vp3.2 codec?
How good is the video compression in vp3.2?
For example, how does it compare (bit rate & quality) to mpeg1, mpeg2,
Divx, real Video 8+, Windows Media, etc. etc.
It being open source is nice and all, but if it can't be reasonably
competitive then there isn't much point to it.
I just haven't seen anything that compares vp32 to anything else.
(Although to be honest, I haven't
2002 Sep 02
2
c't listening test: Ogg problem at 128kbps
Hi there,
I'm new to this list, and in fact rather new to the Ogg/Vorbis codec
altogether. I recently downloaded the test files from the test
conducted by the German computer magazine c't (this was mentioned by
someone here recently).
The idea was that you were given seven WAV files each for 64kbps and
128kbps, and had to rate them. The files were randomly chosen for each
participant.
2001 Sep 26
4
SSSCA
This may not directly be a vorbis topic, but it could have some VERY serious
implications for open source development. I read this morning on the doom9
site about the "Security Systems Standard and Certification Act." I not a
lawyer so I'm just going by doom9's interpretation. Here's an excerpt from
doom9:
"Should it pass kiss your rights as a consumer by bye. As a side
2009 Jul 04
2
Some questions about Theora IP
Hello Theora developers,
I'm doing some cursory research into Theora's IP status in preparation
for asking Apple to reconsider the possibility of shipping an
implementation. I have a few questions and I'm hoping knowledgeable
people can help out.
1) What are the terms of any patent licenses or disclaimers, and do
they have field of use restrictions or limitations on code for
2006 Feb 09
3
Xp Home hack + Domain join
Hello fellows,
Does anyone of you has found the hack to permit win xp home edition to
join a domain controller.
I found somewhere on the net a software that does this.
But it cost 145 $ US, so like the upgrade... ( the only difference in
that i will not give the money to Bill Gates)
My problem is with the password modification.
Every times someone does change his password, he has to go onto the
2004 Aug 10
2
Browsing problem with duplicate domains
I have this problem with Samba:
"create_workgroup: workgroup name PRAISENET is too long. Truncating to
PRAISENET
2004/08/10 21:47:08, 0] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:create_workgroup(68)"
There are many lines like this in my logs, for every workgroup when its master
browser is a Samba 3.
Moreover there are duplicate domains (for the same domain) on the network
Workgroup
2009 Mar 23
1
Memdisk + Freedos problem
I and some other people have problems with running the freedos image included in
Ultimate Boot CD (UBCD), when using memdisk for floppy emulation.
Memdisk starts booting the image and freedos shows the following menu:
0 Boot Clean
1 Boot UMBPCI (silent)
2 Boot UMBPCI (optimal)
3 Boot UMBPCI (semi-defensive)
4 Boot EMM386 (optimal)
5 Boot EMM386 (semi-defensive)
6 Boot no UMB (defensive)
7 Boot
2015 Jul 05
2
WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE_CHANNEL_MASK is not described
An issue was raised at <http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1728923#post1728923> -
FLAC uses WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE_CHANNEL_MASK tag to describe non-standard layout,
but it isn't mentioned anywhere in FLAC format.
Channel assignment is described at <https://xiph.org/flac/format.html#frame_header>:
"Where defined, the channel order follows SMPTE/ITU-R recommendations."
2002 Jun 25
2
Ogg Vorbis in the news
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-938564.html
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
2002 Sep 17
2
Serious, inacceptable artefacts with Ogg Vorbis
Hello developers,
I recently participated in a public listening test that was held by
German magazine c't. They had two categories, 64 kbps and 128 kbps.
I only participated in the 64 kbps test where there were 7 .wav files,
with 1 of them the original one and the other 6 being encoded with
different encoders. Without knowing which file was encoded with which
encoder you had to give each
2001 Mar 05
1
Ogg Vorbis in press / in real live
Just for info -- please have a look at
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/vza-05.03.01-000/ (short news article)
and
http://www.oggmusic.de (ogg vorbis encoded music up-/download)
(German only)
So long
Friedrich
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
2015 Jul 14
0
WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE_CHANNEL_MASK is not described
Maybe I don't understand you correctly, but 0000 is mono, not undefined. It
says: 0000-0111 : (number of independent channels)-1
I agree that the use of WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE_CHANNEL_MASK should be
documented. I can probably take a look at it this week or so, if no one
hasn't already?
2015-07-05 13:54 GMT+02:00 lvqcl <lvqcl.mail at gmail.com>:
> An issue was raised at <
>
2016 Oct 01
0
NHW codec
Hello,
I would like to discuss a little about the NHW codec and its state after
nearly 5 years on the Xiph forums.
I also know that if I would like to discuss I'd better go to the great
Doom9 and Encode.ru forums but for now I find that my codec is too
experimental for these professional forums:
- the codec is only for fixed 512x512 size, just a test tool.
- there is only mid compression
-
2018 May 15
0
NHW Project - A new release?
Hello,
I just wanted your opinion on should I make a new release 0.1.5 of the NHW
Project?
I would like to finalyze all the current quality settings and add a -l8
high compression setting, and I am not far from it, all the quality
settings are nearly validated if not final, and then release a new version.
With this new version, I would like to extend my search area, and present
the NHW Project
2004 Aug 06
3
OT: whats your opinion of ODDSOCK streamTranscoder?
At 01:02 AM 3/13/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Oddsock, how come you don't include the most compatable lame_enc.dll with
>the windows streamTranscoder binary?
because legally I cannot. Distribution of a mp3 encoder requires license
fees to appropriate patent holders....one of the truly great things about
ogg vorbis......no license fees :)
oddsock
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives:
2015 Jul 21
1
A couple of questions about channel mapping
Sorry for the delay; I have been waiting for
SourceForge to come back on-line.
lvqcl wrote:
> 1) It seems that some programs (eac3to) write the value of
> WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE_CHANNEL_MASK tag with uppercase 'x' (e.g. 0X3)
> (see <http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1728852#post1728852>)
>
> Also, from MediaInfo changelog
2001 Dec 28
0
[OT] (newbie alert) - home DV video and Premiere?
> Q1) Is there an easy "setup.exe" or similar, to install the Vorbis codec
> into Windows?
Not as such, no. I think what you're looking for, for your purposes, is an
ACM codec, to produce Vorbis data wrapped in a RIFF-WAV header. For use in
WAV and AVI and the like.
I did come across such a beast a while back, but I think it had trouble
recognizing/decoding RC2-encoded data.
2007 May 22
2
Patches for Xen 3.1 packaging
Hi,
attached (hopefully ;-)) you'll find patches against the current SVN
for xen-3.0 and xen-common to support Xen 3.1. Packages I've build
with them run fine under Debian Etch for a couple of days now (with
the official 2.6.18-4-xen kernel).
But I am sure there will be some issues. I did not do any
modifications regarding versioning - something that changes with Xen
3.1.