similar to: texreg error while exporting regression table

Dear listers, I am trying to export a regression output to a latex document using the R package eststo. I have two variables: an ordered factor: group <- gl(3,5,20, labels=c("Ctl","Trt","prp")) and a continuous variable: weight <- runif(20) I want to regress weight over group, therefore I run: reg1 <- lm(weight ~ group) I wish to include the output of my

Dear R listers, I am regressing an ordered variable over an ordered independent variable using polr. The output lists every level of the ordered independent variable repeating its name and adding a suffix. In my case my variable is called "o.particip" and in my regression table I get the following: o.particip.L o.particip.Q o.particip.C o.particip^4 o.particip^5 o.particip^6 Is

Dear R-listers, does anybody can suggest some manual where I can learn more about how the hooks in knitr work? I am trying to enclose the output of an R command in the Latex verbatim environment. I defined a hook as follows: knit_hooks$set(fsverb = function(x, options) { paste("\\begin(verbatim)\n", x, "\\end(verbatim)\n", sep = "") } then I set a chunk as

Dear R listers, I am trying to create a new variable that uniquely identifies groups of observations in a dataset. So far I couldn't figure out how to do this in R. In Stata I would simply type: egen newvar = group(dim1, dim2, dim3) Please, find below a quick example to show what I am dealing with: I have a dataset with 4 variables: var <- runif(50) ## a variable that I want to group

Dear R helpers, I'm trying to recode an ordered factor to reverse its scale, but I can't figure out how to make it. I am using the Recode function provided by the Car package. I've created an ordered variable: data$o.var1 <- ordered(data$var1, levels=c(1,2,3,4), labels =c("very satisfied", "fairly satisfied", "not very satisfied", "not at all

Dear R helpers, I am using knitr to run analysis with R and edit my document with Latex. I am wondering whether there is a way to include 2 or more pictures per chunk and being able to refer them in the text independently and eventually whether it is possible to give them different captions. Let me give you an example.Rnw: \documentclass{article} \title{Example} \author{FS} \begin{document}

Dear R listers, I am trying to compute the mean of a dummy variable that is encoded as a factor. However, even though the levels of my factor are 0 - 1, when I compute the mean (after coercing the factor to be numeric), R changes 0 into 1 and 1 into yes, thus altering my expected result. Please, consider the following working example: pp <- rep(0:1, 10) pp <- factor(pp, levels=(0:1),

I'm trying to run an ordered logistic regression model. I've run the following code, but the output does not provide the p-values. Is there some command to include the p-values in the output. reg2 <- polr(trade1 ~ age2 + education2 + personal2 + economy2 + partisan2 + employment2 + union2 + home2 + market2 + race2 + income2) summary(reg2) Re-fitting to get Hessian# Call:

In that case, I can't work out why the first model fails but not the second. I would start looking at "Data" to see what it contains. if: object2 <- polr(Inc ~ Training ,Data,Hess = T,method = "logistic" ) works, the problem may be with the "Adopt" variable. Jim On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Willy Byamungu <wmulimbi at email.uark.edu> wrote: >

Hi, I'm getting an error message using polr(): Error in optim(start, fmin, gmin, method = "BFGS", hessian = Hess, ...) : initial value in 'vmmin' is not finite The outcome variable is ordinal and factored, and the independant variable is continuous. I've checked the source code for both polr() and optim() and can't find any variable called

Hi all. I'm just starting to explore ordinal multinomial regression. My dataset is 300,000 rows, with an outcome (ordinal factor from 1 to 9) and five independent variables (all continuous). My first stab at it was this: pomod <- polr(Npf ~ o_stddev + o_skewness + o_kurtosis + o_acl_1e + dispersal, rlc, Hess=TRUE) And that worked; I got a good model fit. However, a variety of other

hello everybody solved the problem with summary, now I have another one eg I estimate > try.op <- polr( > as.ordered(sod.sit.ec.fam) ~ > log(y) + > log(1 + nfiglimin) + > log(1 + nfiglimagg) + > log(ncomp - nfiglitot) + > eta + > I(eta^2) + >

This is a follow up to the message I posted 3 days ago about how to estimate mixed ordinal logit models. I hope you don't mind that I am just pasting in the code and comments from an R file for your feedback. Actual estimates are at the end of the post. ### Subject: mixed ordinal logit via "augmented" data setup. ### I've been interested in estimating an ordinal logit model

Hi all!! I am using a proportinal odds model to study some ordered categorical data. I am trying to predict one ordered categorical variable taking into account only another categorical variable. I am using polr from the R MASS library. It seems to work ok, but I'm still getting familiar and I don't know how to assess goodness of fit. I have this output, when using response ~ independent

Hi all!! I am using a proportinal odds model to study some ordered categorical data. I am trying to predict one ordered categorical variable taking into account only another categorical variable. I am using polr from the R MASS library. It seems to work ok, but I'm still getting familiar and I don't know how to assess goodness of fit. I have this output, when using response ~ independent

Dear all, To modelize the abundance of fish (4 classes) with a set of environmental variables, I used the polr and predict.polr functions. I would like to know how to bring the cumulated probabilities back to a discrete ordinal scale. For the moment I used the predict.polr function with the argument "class". Is there an other way? polrf <- polrf <- polr_mod(formula =

Dear Sir, I get an error message when I use polr() in MASS package. My data is "ord.dat". I made "y" a factor. y y1 y2 x lx 1 0 0 0 3.2e-02 -1.49485 2 0 0 0 3.2e-02 -1.49485 3 0 0 0 1.0e-01 -1.00000 4 0 0 0 1.0e-01 -1.00000 5 0 0 0 3.2e-01 -0.49485 6 0 0 0 3.2e-01 -0.49485 7 1 1 0 1.0e+00 0.00000 8 0 0 0 1.0e+00 0.00000 9 1 1 0

Hello, I am running a model with four categories and want predicted probabilities in each category. Now for this example I wont give a counterfactual just the training data is fine but is there anyway to get a confidence interval around the predicted probabilities in each group? I have tried but it gives me probabilities and I have used interval="confidence", level=.095 and then interval

Hey, everyone, I am using proportional odds model for ordinal responses in dose-response experiments. For some samll data, SAS can successfully provide estimators of the parameters, but the built-in function polr() in R fails. Would you like to tell me how to make some change so I can use polr() to obtain the estimators? Or anyone can give me a hint about the conditions for the existance of MLE

Hello again I am trying to fit an ordinal logistic model using the polr function from MASS. When I run model.loan.ordinal <- polr(loancat~age + sex + racgp + yrseduc + needlchg + gallery + sniffball + smokeball + sniffher + smokeher + nicocaine + inject + poly(year.of.int,3) + druginj + inj.years) I get an error Error in optim(start, fmin, gmin, method = "BFGS", hessian =