similar to: smbd -F: standard input is not a socket, assuming -D option

Hardware: 2x Intel Xeon Quad-Core 2.33GHz 24GB FBDIMM RAM 2x 2TB HDD in RAID-1 Intel Server Board S5400SF Setup: Arch Linux x86_64 Xen 4.1.2 Grub2 Multiboot Synopsis: I set up a new VM for Debian Squeeze following instructions here: http://www.howtoforge.com/installing-debian-squeeze-6.0-domu-on-centos-5.5-x86_64-dom0. Partitioning & installation completed correctly. When I tried to run the

Hi, I have been doing some tests using hping2 and TCP SYN pings targeting local and remote hosts from two FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p10 and one Linux 2.4.18 host. The three machines have the same hardware configuration and have been running for 6 months now. The average load isnt too high (usually 0.01 to 0.15) on the FreeBSD machines. Here is the output from hping2 (excuse me the line wrap),

Hello everybody, I've had a samba environment with the following "brief" description: - There are 2 DC (*samba4 *and *samba4bkp*) running samba version 4.1.6 on my domain (*SMB*). DNS back end is Samba Internal DNS; - I've added a new DC (*king*) running samba version 4.10.2 and as DC to *SMB *domain with BIND9 DNS Back End; - *king* has updated dns zones and

Hi all, My infrastructure is GlusterFS with 2 Nodes: L137B-GlusterFS-Node1.L137B-root.com L137B-GlusterFS-Node2.L137B-root.com I have followed this guide: http://www.itzgeek.com/how-tos/linux/centos-how-tos/install-and-configure-glusterfs-on-centos-7-rhel-7.html/2 I have created a device, formatted as ext4, mounted it. The next step was to install gluster FS. I installed glusterfs 3.10.3,

Hi! I've got troubles with dynamic dns updates. Ubuntu: 12.04 / Samba 4.0.0 / followed off. howto Winsrv: Server 2k8R2 root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# samba -V Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-94f11e9 root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# kinit administrator at SCHAU.LOCAL Password for administrator at SCHAU.LOCAL: root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# klist Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Default principal: administrator

Hello, what does the wine error message "unknown DOS version" mean? Will I have to change my wine configuration in some way? Or is the program not runnable with wine at all? Any hints are appreciated. Thanks in advance. Martin

Hello, I was looking to tackle the "StringRef'ize APIs" suggestion from the clang project page and just wanted to post a couple of thoughts and ask a couple of questions. First of all I am going to talk about how I see the goals of the project. Basically, as far as I understand it I will be converting existing functions that take std::string or char*'s to use llvm::StringRef

Package: xen-3 version: 3.1.0-2 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: make[5]: Entering directory `/build/user/xen-3-3.1.0/debian/build/build-utils_i386/tools/libxc' gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686

Hi list, CentOS 4.4 connecting to Promise M500i iSCSI disk array. 2/4 servers connect fine with iscsi-initiator-utils-4.0.3.0-4. The other 2 servers have this in dmesg: SCSI device sdb: 1 512-byte hdwr sectors (0 MB) sdb: asking for cache data failed sdb: assuming drive cache: write through SCSI device sdb: 1 512-byte hdwr sectors (0 MB) sdb: asking for cache data failed sdb: assuming drive

Hi to all, In other statistical software, such as Eviews, it is possible to regress a model with the Least Squares method, assuming that the residuals follow an AR(q) process. For example the resulting regression is something like y = 1.2154 + 0.2215 x + 0.251 AR(1) How is it possible to do the same in R? Thank you very much in advance, Constantine Tsardounis http://www.costis.name

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 05:54:51PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > No idea why this happens: > > index-parse.y: In function 'yyparse': > index-parse.c:1256:6: error: assuming pointer wraparound does not occur when comparing P +- C1 with P +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow] > if (yyss + yystacksize - 1 <= yyssp) > ^ > > It only happens on one machine,

Yes, paraphrasing Murphy I can say of myself: "Nothing seems to be able to stop a stupid thought in its pathway from the brain to the keyboard". :-) Sorry once again and thank for your patience. Stefano > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk] > Inviato: venerd?? 23 luglio 2004 16.30 > A: Guazzetti Stefano > Cc: Luis

Still wrong: > x <- data.frame(a = sample(letters[1:3], 10, replace=T), b=1:10) > x a b 1 a 1 2 a 2 3 b 3 4 b 4 5 a 5 6 a 6 7 b 7 8 b 8 9 b 9 10 c 10 > subset(x, a == c("b", "c")) a b 3 b 3 7 b 7 9 b 9 10 c 10 > subset(x, a %in% c("b", "c")) a b 3 b 3 4 b 4 7 b 7 8 b 8 9 b 9 10 c 10 What matters

sorry for my previus (WRONG) answer, as someone already pointed out a solution could be subset(data, PUNTAR==c("IX49","IX48")) > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Guazzetti Stefano > Inviato: venerd?? 23 luglio 2004 15.55 > A: 'Luis Rideau Cruz'; r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > Oggetto: R: [R] retrieve rows from frame assuming criterion > >

No idea why this happens: index-parse.y: In function 'yyparse': index-parse.c:1256:6: error: assuming pointer wraparound does not occur when comparing P +- C1 with P +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow] if (yyss + yystacksize - 1 <= yyssp) ^ It only happens on one machine, and not on any others, even though they have similar versions of gcc and bison installed. Rich. -- Richard

Hi all, I have a data frame in which one column(PUNTAR) is of character type. What I want is to retrieve is the frame but only with those rows matching elements of PUNTAR with a list characters (e.g c("IX49","IX48") ) Year TUR STODNR PUNTAR 1994 9412 94020061 IX49 1994 9412 94020062 IX48 1994 9412 94020063 X32 1994 9412 94020065 X23 1994 9412

Jeroen Dobbelaere via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > Hi Jesper, > >> Thanks, these are interesting differences. The CHAR_BIT and byte >> relation is established in the C standard and I would prefer the byte >> terminology. It means the same thing as addressable unit but is a bit >> shorter and probably more widely known. > > Looking

I agree, addressable unit size is probably a better abstraction. However, in the lib/CodeGen directory alone, there's some 785 uses of the word "byte" and a significant fraction of the code that we want to modify is using the byte terminology today. An example of unmodified code from my showcase patch set: assert(!(Shift & 0x7) == 0 && "Shifts not

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of JF > Bastien via llvm-dev > > I’m not a fan of C and C++ supporting anything but 8 bits per byte. > Realistically, C and C++ on such targets are different languages from 8- > bit-per-byte C and C++, and therefore code isn’t portable from one to the > other. Having done

Hi Jeroen, Thanks, these are interesting differences. The CHAR_BIT and byte relation is established in the C standard and I would prefer the byte terminology. It means the same thing as addressable unit but is a bit shorter and probably more widely known. Do you suggest any in-tree changes at some call sites using the suggested AdressSpace parameter or would we rely on the default value always?