similar to: Networking problem on virtualized pfSense firewall

Hi. I've configured a Samba PDC controller on which I've configured a couple of printers using Cups. I've set up the relevant config according to the documentation, so: load printers = Yes printing = cups printcap name = cups [print$] comment = Printer Drivers path = /dati/samba/drivers browseable = yes guest ok = no read only = yes

Hi. I need to setup a single Samba server with multiple domains. I did more than one setup with single domain, but I'm having troubles finding info about multiple domain, especially with LDAP. Can anyone point me to a link, possibly with examples, on how to configure such a setup? many thanks -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.it YetOpen S.r.l. - http://www.yetopen.it/ Via Carlo

I know about this param, I configured it and log.smbd, log.nmbd and others are rotated, log.samba is not. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: "Lorenzo Milesi" <maxxer at yetopen.it>, "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 7:29:04 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] log.samba

Can you try this and adjust the path's in it. #/etc/logrotate.d/samba /var/log/samba/log.smbd { weekly missingok rotate 7 postrotate [ ! -x /usr/bin/smbcontrol ] || [ ! -f /run/samba/smbd.pid ] || /usr/bin/smbcontrol smbd reload-config endscript compress delaycompress notifempty } /var/log/samba/log.nmbd {

Samba 4.12.1 installed from source following the wiki. I noticed /usr/local/samba/var/log.samba is not being rotated at all, it starts since the day I installed and it's still growing (500M so far). Is this something which must be handled manually with a logrotate entry? What signalling does samba require after the file has been rotated? I didn't find anything on the wiki, is it worth

I'm having a weird situation with a freshly installed Samba v4.12.1 compiled from source. This is a single server with DC and fileserver, I followed all the guidelines for doing things correctly in this specific situation and I hope I haven't missed anything. The server works correctly as expected, I'm managing all the permissions from Windows. Unfortunately users occasionally

I've set up a single server with a DC and fileserver. I've read through all docs and the warnings on the wiki (VERY well done, many thanks to all the contributors) more than once so I hope I haven't missed anything. smb.conf: # Global parameters [global] netbios name = FILESERVER realm = WDC.DOMAIN.IT server role = active directory domain controller

> Yes you can use the Ubuntu 22.04 packages if you really must, but this > will only get you Samba 4.15.3 > On the other hand, Using Samba from backports on Debian bullseye will > get you 4.17.8 and is, in my opinion, easier to use. Both for Debian and Ubuntu it's better to use Michael repos, to get consistent minor release updates: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/README

> samba-tool domain: no such subcommand: provision Are you sure there's no typo or hidden character? provision command is still there in 4.18.2 :) # samba-tool domain provision ERROR: No domain set! -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.com CTO @ YetOpen Srl Corso Martiri della Liberazione 114 - 23900 Lecco - ITALY - | 4801 Glenwood Avenue - Suite 200 - Raleigh, NC 27612 - USA

Hi. I need to use some other distributions other than Debian as a Xen domU. These distributions are: - Fedora Core 7 - Opensuse 10.2 - Gentoo 2007.0 - Slackware 11.0 - Ubuntu 6.06.1 Server - Ubuntu 7.04 Server - Centos 5.0 - Mandriva 2007 Could you tell me a way to install it as domU, please? I searched for rpmstrap, but it supports only Fedora Core 4 and Centos 4... Could you help me, please?

> The latest Samba version is 4.10.6 and there have been numerous updates > since 4.3.11, but you shouldn't be having the problem you have, so lets > start be you posting your smb.conf Thank you very much. Here it is: [global] server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate realm = domain.lan ldap server require strong auth =

> Not sure, but that is the way it looks, just a thought, are you using > sssd ? no, not even installed > Just like a normal share, '[homes]' is a special share that doesn't use > 'path. There used to be something on the wiki about using '[home]' on a > DC, I didn't know it had gone until you mentioned it ;-) So if I use [home] it would be a normal

Latest Samba4 upgrade (4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.26) broke external LDAP auth probably with the following error: LDAP request size (81) exceeds (0) samba-tool outputs the following when ran: Unknown parameter encountered: "ldap max anonymous request size" Ignoring unknown parameter "ldap max anonymous request size" Unknown parameter encountered: "ldap max authenticated

Hi. We migrated a S4 workgroup to S4 AD DC, I'm trying to allow users to access the new \\fileserver with the old host name \\server. I added a CNAME record to the AD DNS zone, created alias for fileserver with samba-tool spn add ldap/SERVER fileserver$ samba-tool spn add HOST/SERVER fileserver$ I also added netbios aliases = server to smb.conf but this should be useless, as

I've just deployed an AD DC fileserver with Samba4 but the server itself is not available when browsing network computers from a Windows PC. Is it because of this [1][2] or did I misconfigure it? Thanks my config: # Global parameters [global] netbios name = FILESERVER realm = WDC.MYDOMAIN.IT server role = active directory domain controller server services =

> That all smells quite similar to what I were seeing > here before, and what someone else were seeing too, > all with 4.17[.4]. This famouse WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND > error too. We upgraded one more domain, and in the hope to avoid this error, we remained on 4.16. So we deployed a new 4.16.9 DC, joined, everything is fine. Remove the old DC, upgrade OS, install 4.16.10 (which was

> I would expect to only see that on a machine with the MIT kdc installed, > try this > > apt-get -s remove krb5-kdc > > This will prove one way or other if it is installed and what it wants to > remove along with it, it will not remove anything. Apparently nothing requires it: The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:

We've recently upgraded a S3 to Samba4 with AD (4.3.11-Ubuntu). The access control on the old installation was done with "valid users" and "write list". We've ported this to ACL, but for some path users are denied access and we cannot understand why. I.e. for a generic share, user "user1" can browse and access almost everything except for directory

> which share isn't working ? > is it 'CONDIVISIONE' ? What is really weird is: Computer01, Win10, user1 logged in as local (not using domain user), share mapped with domain user. In the path I've posted in the first message the user can access BUT cannot write. Computer01, Win10, user1 logged in as domain user: same as above, user can access the folder but cannot write.

On 07/02/2023 18:35, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: > > >> A little more context, manual replication unfortunately doesn't help: > > Last (sorry for the spam, I'm starting to forget things): > > # dig _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.wdc.domain.it srv > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.wdc.domain.it. 900 IN SRV 0 100 389 dc1.wdc.domain.it. > >