similar to: Ubuntu upstart

?Hi, I was wondering if anyone has managed to get the preload_app and SIGUSR2 combination working well with upstart? My issue currently is that when I perform a SIGUSR2 against the master, check everything''s working and close off the old master, upstart then attempts to restart it because the original PID/binary are no longer running. What is the correct way of handling this? In my

Currently, on deploys we''re sending HUP to the "old" master to reload the config, and then we send it a USR2 to reload the app code. Is this redundant -- i.e. does USR2 reload the unicorn config, or just the application code? I am under the impression that USR2 forks a new master from the old, and only reloads app code, and not the unicorn config, but I just wanted to double

Hey guys, I''m sending USR2 to unicorn after cap deploy, and the old master is getting replaced by a new master that doesn''t work. Here are some similar threads I found ... http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-unicorn/2010-October/000733.html http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-unicorn/2010-October/000717.html I''m not using Bundler, and I have working_directory

Hi - I tried to get Daemontools and Unicorn working together a while back - there are issues on USR2 restart because of the pid change - I''m hoping someone in the community will have some understanding of this issue I documented my experience and eventual defeat here : http://log.robotarmyma.de/post/2053448029/daemontools-ubuntu-rvm-bundler-unicorn-install Any help would be received

First off thanks very much for all the hard work on unicorn. Alas, we''ve encountered an issue where unicorn fails to spawn new workers that have loaded the incoming revision on a capistrano deploy. I''m not entirely sure the issue is due to unicorn as it appears that bundler was responsible for a similar issue in the past:

Hello, I''m using unicorn since a while, but now I try to run it the first time inside a FreeBSD jail. The initial start of unicorn works fine and it serves all the requests. But if I want to restart it using the USR2 signal, it (more or less) slowly starts using more and more CPU cycles. There is no error message in the logs and it quite hard to reproduce that error. In 1 of 20 tries,

Hi, A couple days ago, I was trying to run Unicorn for Ramaze, and found that `Unicorn.run'' didn''t share the same interface with other Rack handlers, i.e. `options[:Host]'' and `options[:Port]'' Because of this, I can''t just use: Rack::Handler.register(''unicorn'', ''Unicorn'') And invoke this:

Signaling using normal kill(2) is preserved, but the master now prefers to signal workers using a pipe rather than kill(2). Non-graceful signals (:TERM/:KILL) are still sent using kill(2), as they ask for immediate shutdown. This change is necessary to avoid triggering the ubf (unblocking function) for rb_thread_call_without_gvl (and similar) functions extensions. Most notably, this fixes

Hi, I have a question about automating the restarting of Unicorn with the following steps, and much appreciate your help. Assumption: (i) "pid" is set to unicorn.pid in the config file; (ii) a Unicorn process is already running. (1) kill -USR2 `cat unicorn.pid` (via Capistrano deployment task for example) (2) Inside the "before_exec" hook in the config file, do: kill -QUIT

hi there, first, kudos to Scott. You guy rock with this revolutionizing (and so logic) idea ;-) next, a personal point of view about the lack of upstream adoption of upstart: I wanted to provide an upstart script for NUT for some time, but never found enough matching example to do so. the embedded scripts only address inittab, and the replacement-initscripts are unreachable (see below) and far

Hi all, I need some help by solving a strange problem: Situation: I wrote a scrip that uses rsync to send backups to another server. It does something like: /usr/bin/rsync -azi --numeric-ids --exclude tmp --exclude var/spool/ --delete -e ssh root at 10.0.0.65:/ /storage/volumes/65 The script has a source file that dictates which servers to backup. E.g. several ip address are visited to

Hi all, Trying to test libvirt 1.1.3 with virtlockd locking my qcow2 images on a NFS storage between two kvm hosts. ./configure ... --with-init-script=upstart Libvirtd upstart script is actually well generated but I can't see nothing about virtlockd... or am I blind ? :) Nevertheless, running virtlockd -d && service libvirtd restart works fine. Am I wrong thinking that editing

Hi Eric, Here is my try to write a quick upstart script for virtlockd. It should be named /etc/init/virtlockd.conf, then : ln -s /lib/init/upstart-job /etc/init.d/virtlockd It seems to work for me : # virtlockd - Locking daemon for libvirt description "virtlockd" start on filesystem and runlevel [2345] stop on starting rc RUNLEVEL=[016] pre-start script test -x

Has a beta been released and if so can anybody say whether it uses Upstart? or Has anyone worked with Upstart?

I am trying, without success, to create an upstart config file to automatically start and restart an ssh proxy. The command sting that I use in the script has been checked and verified from the shell but it fails in the upstart file. The file contents are: . . . # proxy is used to authenticate smtp submissions # so start it before the postfix service starts start on starting postfix # Take

Good morning, The tuning page says worker_processes should be at least the number of CPU cores on a dedicated server. In the case of hyper-threading, should this be the number of cores or the number of threads? For example the Intel Core i7-2600 Quadcore[1] has 4 cores and 8 threads. Would I start my worker_processes at 4 or 8? Finally, would the same apply to Nginx worker processes? Many

Hello, I'm just migrating my boxes to fedora 9 which brings us to the upstart mechanism instead of SystemV, etc.The distro as it is delivered does not have configuration which supports powerfail events. What can I put in /etc/events.d to make nut work again with the rest of the system fortimely shutdown, etc? Pointers to example files are very welcome! Thanks. Kind regards, Udo

I am having issues when using unicorn with a Capistrano deployment. >From what I have been able to understand Capistrano uses a scheme in wich every release is deployed inside the releases directory under a unique name and if the transaction was successful, creates a symlink named current that will point to that release. So I end up with a deployment directory such as:

I am running a samba ad on Ubuntu 16.04 configured as told in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller The server is running fine currently, but I have to manually start it after every reboot. The link to the upstart scripts in the wiki are dead: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_Init_Script_Examples Does anyone have a functioning init

Hello all, I have always deploys rails apps with unicorn and nginx as a reverse proxy in the past. However, I am working with a new firm and they would like to use Apache with mod_pagespeed in front of unicorn. We will be deploying a rails 3.1 app with streaming. To me, mod_pagespeed does not seem like a magic bullet, as it appears to be a collection of best practices which have to be rewritten