similar to: PEAQ(CELT)

Hi, I have noticed in the source code of CELT the numbers?like 2.f ,? 102.f? ,? 0.1f? ,? etc... What does the " f "? mean in this case? Is the number 102.f?? equal to the number 102 or the number 0.1f?? equal to the number? 0.1?! Thank you for your attention. Osama Y. Fadhil. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, ?I'm trying to improve CELT according to the bit allocation problem and psychoacoustic masking which was mentioned in the paper "A High-Quality Speech and Audio Codec With Less Than 10-ms Delay". What software version do you prefer for me to choose?on my study? Best Regards, Osama Y. Fadhil. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Good Morning; Iam asking whether any one have knowledge about is it possiple to incorporate a psycoacoustic model?(specifically?I mean ?MPEG-1 psychoacoustic model 1) into the CELT codec(any version even older versions of the coder,?no matter) Iam using version 0.3.2. Kind Regards; Osama. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Can you tell me where is the function that calls the function compute_allocation() in CELT codec version 0.3.2 ? Best Regards, Osama Y. Fadhil. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20101201/4e309a23/attachment-0002.htm

Hi, *"That's in general not very reliable. You can get PEAQ to say all sorts of silly things." Can you provide me links for any more effective tools other than PEAQ? Which is more reliable for Speex resampler? * *"strongly suspect that it's just not compensating for the delay introduced by the resampler. Because higher quality means higher delay, you'd find that PEAQ

Dear all, Iam a student pursuing MSc degree in computer science at the University of Babylon,Iraq. My project is about the CELT. I have chosen version 0.3.2 of the software, lcc compiler, windows xp environment. One of my current problems is that when I execute the?testcelt program tool,?the output audio file can not be payed. Could you help me, please? I have tried some media players ,like

Hi, Can you give me some directions or notes which to be followed in order to do dynamic allocation in CELT ? Best Regards, Osama Y. Fadhil. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20101205/0a1aa44e/attachment-0002.htm

Hi, Can you explain to me how did you get equation (6) in the CELT paper "A High-Quality Speech and Audio Codec With Less Than 10-ms Delay"? Best Regards, Osama Y. Fadhil. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20101209/9c03ca0a/attachment-0002.htm

Warning: Sligthly off topic. http://shelleytherepublican.com/2006/04/linux-european-threat-to-our-computers.html Quotes: > And guess what software Osama Bin Laden uses on his laptop? > > If you guessed it was Linux you would be 100% right. > Next time somebody asks you how Al Queda agents pay for their > rifles and rocket launchers, you can tell them that foreign hackers >

Hi Rhishi, PQevalaudio is very unreliable and buggy. I have compared to PEAQ and - as a result - now I am not using it anymore. With best regards, Christian Hoene Von: opus-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:opus-bounces at xiph.org] Im Auftrag von Rhishikesh Agashe Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Oktober 2013 12:35 An: opus at xiph.org Cc: Rasmi Mishra Betreff: [opus] ODG (Objective Difference

Emperors1000@aol.com wrote: > > Dear reader, > The emperorsclothes list does not seem to be working. Please forgive us if > you receive this post twice. - Jared Israel, www.tenc.net > ************************** > URL for this article: http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/rozoff/abyss.htm > > To join the Emperor's Clothes email list, go to >

Hi, I have found differences in quality between opus_demo and opusenc/opusdec. I used for both applications the same raw pcm file,16 bit,48khz,litle endian. i use libopus 1.1-beta and opus-tools-0.1.7. The command for opus_demo is: opus_demo audio 48000 1 64000 -cvbr -framesize 10 in.pcm out.pcm For opusenc/dec: opusenc --raw --raw-chan 1 bitrate 64 -cvbr --framesize 10 in.pcm in.opus

Hi, I just built a sample application with speex resampler in linux and I tried to resample 8K sine wave tone mono to 48k using speex_resample_process_int. I am using a tool called EAQUAL for audio quality. I find the quality of Speex resampler to be decreasing when I increase the quality q of the resampler init function. Can some one give me pointers regarding this?? As per the API, if the

Dear All, Is there any modules to compute the chi-square goodness of fit , K.S. statistics and Anderson Darling nonparametric test and compre the fitting of a class of distributions using these tests? Thank you. Osama Hussien -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send

Hello Osama, and Hisham, At 1330GMT there was some malicious activity coming from your network IP 37.75.210.90. Please act accordingly. Things that may be of use "972599779558" N.

On 2/18/08, Premkiran Mannava <loverays@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > *"That's in general not very reliable. You can get PEAQ to say all sorts > of silly things." > > Can you provide me links for any more effective tools other than PEAQ? > Which is more reliable for Speex resampler?* I can already tell you what Jean-Marc will say -- use your ears :)

I am aware of a couple CELT users running the codec across a bit-error channel where corruption takes the form of flipped bits (such as a raw wireless link) rather than a packet-loss channel (like ethernet or an IP network). CELT has been designed to work reasonably well on both kinds of channel. You can turn a bit-error channel into a packet-loss channel by including a CRC across the entire

emperors1000@aol.com wrote: > > This is being sent on behalf of emperors1000@aol.com > as part of the mailing list that you joined. > List: emperorsclothes > URL: http://www.emperors-clothes.com > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > URL for this article: http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/dekkers.htm > > Join Emperor's Clothes

Hello David, In brief, I've solved this problem on my Dell Inspiron 1525 (with Broadcom 4312 wireless card), so I figured letting You know would be nice, 'cause it didn't seem like the issue is resolved. Visit this link: http://jomcode.com/fadhil/?p=59 and in addition check out the comment on the same page by Andre Kiepe to have the modules load on boot. Best Regards, Milos.

Premkiran Mannava a ?crit : > I just built a sample application with speex resampler in linux and I > tried to resample 8K sine wave tone mono to 48k using > speex_resample_process_int. I am using a tool called EAQUAL for audio > quality. That's in general not very reliable. You can get PEAQ to say all sorts of silly things. > I find the quality of Speex resampler to be