similar to: Current git CELT breaks audio above +3dBFS.

hi. i am currently adding celt support to netjack. very nice to see a free low-latency codec :) i currently dont require robustness against packet loss, because the sync code of netjack does not handle packet loss very gracefully. how much bandwidth is wasted for this feature ? is it sensible, to have the data downsampled berfore encoding , in order to reduce bandwidth ? i suspect that just

I am aware of a couple CELT users running the codec across a bit-error channel where corruption takes the form of flipped bits (such as a raw wireless link) rather than a packet-loss channel (like ethernet or an IP network). CELT has been designed to work reasonably well on both kinds of channel. You can turn a bit-error channel into a packet-loss channel by including a CRC across the entire

Hi all, I am the developer of the llcon software (llcon.sf.net) which is a software making it possible for musicians to play in real-time over the internet. Up to now I have used ADPCM or no audio coding. Gregory Maxwell was pointing me to the great CELT project. Using CELT has the advantage to be able to use higher sample rates, getting lower code rate and better error concealment. I have

Hi, Since our device can only handle the Celt part of Opus (due to a MIPS limitation), we have two questions: 1. Is it possible to via SDP force the remote party to send a specific mode of the 32 different possible modes or to force the remote side to use CELT only? 2. In the reference implementation of Opus it looks like the only way to force the encoder to use CELT only

So, once all those things are in place what Andrew says WILL happen? I think plans as important as that deserves an announcement. Roadmap for the project? Future directions for the main committers? Are there patent issues? Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:45:14 -0400 > From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [CELT-dev] Mailing list and project shutdown >

# make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/celt-0.7.0' Making all in libcelt make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/celt-0.7.0/libcelt' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -s -O3 -march=i686 -fvisibility=hidden -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wall -Wextra -Wcast-align -Wnested-externs -Wshadow -Wno-parentheses

On 09/12/2007, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > The full source for CELT is available at: > http://downloads.us.xiph.org/releases/celt/celt-0.0.1.tar.gz > or through git at http://git.xiph.org/celt.git It seems the current version of celt in git has an experimental Ogg mapping ... I've written up the bos page at

--- celt/arch.h | 2 ++ celt/arm/fixed_arm64.h | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ celt_headers.mk | 1 + 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+) create mode 100644 celt/arm/fixed_arm64.h diff --git a/celt/arch.h b/celt/arch.h index 9f74ddd..219569b 100644 --- a/celt/arch.h +++ b/celt/arch.h @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ static OPUS_INLINE opus_int16 SAT16(opus_int32 x)

--- celt/arch.h | 2 ++ celt/arm/fixed_arm64.h | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ celt_headers.mk | 1 + 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+) create mode 100644 celt/arm/fixed_arm64.h diff --git a/celt/arch.h b/celt/arch.h index 9f74ddd..219569b 100644 --- a/celt/arch.h +++ b/celt/arch.h @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ static OPUS_INLINE opus_int16 SAT16(opus_int32 x)

Aymeric Moizard a ?crit : >> None of that is defined yet, though I'm open to suggestions on how to do >> the mapping. > > CELT/44100 and CELT/48000 > a=fmtp:105 stereo=on > > probably a latency value? It would definitely need a frame_size value > "CELT" doesn't seems to be used for any other existing audio related > stuff? right? Not yet.

I too would like to know the status of the opus IP holders. From what I've seen on the CELT and opus lists, it seems that the CELT part of opus is covered by patents from Xiph and Broadcom, and the SILK part of opus is covered by the rest. All of the IP holders except Qualcomm and Huawei have released their patents to the public as far as opus is concerned, and the general consensus from

Diana Cionoiu a ?crit : > Hi Jean-Marc, > > 1. Why CELT versus Speex? There's nearly no overlap between Speex and CELT. CELT is much higher quality, very low latency, and of course, higher bit-rate than Speex. So it really depends on the application. > 2. What's the RTP payload for CELT, so we can add it in Yate? > 3. What are the SDP declaration parameters? None of that

As some of you may know, I'm going to be presenting CELT at the upcoming linux.conf.au conference in January. See http://linux.conf.au/programme/schedule/view_talk/187?day=thursday for details about the talk. I would like to include some references to real world applications, demos, etc., where your are already using (or planning to use) CELT. If you want me to mention your project in front of

Hi all, Just a quick note to let you know that we are currently integrating CELT with our DAB transmission and reception software tools. We plan to have a working demo at the broadcast conference IBC 2009 in September where we have a small booth. We hope to be able to demonstrate a real-time DAB CELT encoder as part our our Live CD based on Ubuntu and GNU/Radio (

I need to test the latency of a system that I ported CELT to. I'd like to set a flag when the stream "changes". In order to see the stream "change", I'd like to be able to scan the compressed CELT directly to set the flag. ie. I'd like to be able to find a byte or two that change reliably between two values when the stream "changes". I don't

Hi, folks, I have an old CELT thing that I'm updating to Opus and I'm trying to get individual pieces upgraded.  My first task is upgrading the CELT encoder to Opus. The old CELT thing treated the L and R channels as independent mono streams, encoded them somehow with CELT to form one bitstream, sent one bitstream across, and then unpacked it manually after the decoder. Can I do that

Hi Jean-Marc, 1. Why CELT versus Speex? 2. What's the RTP payload for CELT, so we can add it in Yate? 3. What are the SDP declaration parameters? Diana Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm happy to announce CELT version 0.5.0. This release includes > simplifications to the bit allocation code and includes a new > low-complexity mode that can be enabled (without

Hi, This isn't that new anymore, but I'd let everyone know that CELT 0.10.0 is out. We've improved the quality quite a bit since the last release and we fixed many bugs. For this release, Monty has written an extensive demo page at: http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/celt/demo.html Although it's not final yet, it contains a lot of information of CELT, recent changes and

I saw the custom API, but nothing explicitly says "CELT-only" just "custom sample rate and frame size". I'll dig further now that you've pointed me in a direction. Thanks, -a On 7/6/15, 6:18 PM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > I believe what you want is called Opus custom (OPUS_CUSTOM in the > code).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I believe what you want is called Opus custom (OPUS_CUSTOM in the code). With that you can compile only the contents of the celt/ directory and use it like the old CELT. Jean-Marc On 07/06/2015 06:48 PM, Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > Is there a configuration or compile flag that lets me disable the > SILK portion of the codec and use CELT