similar to: zero/mute pattern ?

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban <foerster at lisas.de> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes <johnny at ...> wrote: > >> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.roth at

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 03/09/2017 07:35 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban <foerster at lisas.de> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes <johnny at ...> wrote: > >> > >>> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >

? There seems to be a memory violation when calling celt_mode_create(48000, 240). ? The function compute_pulse_cache() calls celt_alloc (the second one, bits=celt_alloc()) in order to allocate 343 byte, but it is using about 872 bytes at that location, which will be deleted by the following allocations. ? In this case the following encoder call crashes at first run. ? Sorry, my time is very

On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Hi, Johnny, >>> >>> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed >>>> that they have upgraded

I try to shape traffic using HTB and mark packets within iptables using PREROUTING. But the filterrules seems to ignore the marks set with PREROUTING Only POSTROUTING marks are accepted. First my configuration I have a router connected to the internet via ADSL over interface ppp0. eth0 is a tunnel to ppp0 and eth1 serves the LAN. LAN is 192.168.57.0/24 on 10Mbit ppp0 is 80.126.16.44 on

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes <johnny at ...> wrote: > On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have

On 03/09/2017 07:35 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban <foerster at lisas.de> wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes <johnny at ...> wrote: >> >>> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 03/09/2017 09:01 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> On 03/09/2017 07:35 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban <foerster at lisas.de> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes <johnny at ...> wrote: >>>>

I tried using the iLBC codec, and whlie I like it, I ran into a strange issue. I did a few searches on Google and haven't found anyone with the same issue as this. Anyhow, I was using a Plantronics analog headset and box plugged into a Digium TDM card, dialed out over my VoIP provider's IAX channel to the PSTN. I was in a conference call which is running on an Avaya PBX (which

Hi all! Using C6 on an Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 motherboard with AMD six core FX6300. That board uses Realtek ALC892 audio chipset. For the first time since I got that motherboard I tried plugging in headphones to the front panel speaker output. I was somewhat displeased to note that the speakers don't mute when that happens. I recall seeing info on that in Fedora, but not Centos, and

Dear R-helpers, I am using confint() within a function, and I want to turn off the message it prints: x <- rnorm(100) y <- x^1.1+rnorm(100) nlsfit <- nls(y ~ g0*x^g1, start=list(g0=1,g1=1)) > confint(nlsfit) Waiting for profiling to be done... 2.5% 97.5% g0 0.4484198 1.143761 g1 1.0380479 2.370057 I cannot find any way to turn off 'Waiting for. .." I tried

I have a CyberPower PR3000LCDRTXL2U with a BP48V75ART2U expansion chassis, which I am monitoring using NUT 2.8.0 (on Gentoo Linux). TThe UPS appears to be telling me that the batteries need replacement due to age. CyberPower support has confirmed that for me and told me how i should be able to mute the alarm from the front panel until I can replace the batteries, but it doesn't appear

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 12:23?PM Phil Stracchino via Nut-upsuser < nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: > I have a CyberPower PR3000LCDRTXL2U with a BP48V75ART2U expansion > chassis, which I am monitoring using NUT 2.8.0 (on Gentoo Linux). TThe > UPS appears to be telling me that the batteries need replacement due to > age. CyberPower support has confirmed that for

Hello, Has anybody been able to get the Mute button work on grandstream? it simply does nothing. Only Hold is avalable, which is not that good. Thanks -- Anton Yurchenko<phila@dg.net.ua> Digital Generation

Hi All, We are currently evaluating the confbridge application while we prepare to upgrade our environment to asterisk v1.6.2.x. We have run in to two issues using it to kick/mute participants in a bridge and would like to ask for the experience of others running the application for any work-arounds. Firstly for kicking participants, would it be possible to use the softhangup application

Hello, I have a really irritating issue that I haven't had time to investigate much - I hope someone has encountered it and can tell me a solution. I didn't see anything in searching archives / sites.. When my Nextel i90c phone gets a page (2 way text message via the internet option) it has an irritating tone to get me to hear it. However this tone seems to mute asterisk (reproducible).

On 3/21/24 14:00, Greg Oliver via Nut-upsuser wrote: > All I can say is definitely replace the batteries if you are going to > keep using it.? The CyberPower(s) I have had in the past all have the > battery check that cannot be turned off and when the batteries are > actually "dead" the unit will kill the load to everything every time it > runs the check.? Just FYI.

Hi. I am using latest asterisk 1.2 and it would be nice in a meetme conference to be able to mute all but a particular user and then unmute all those users again with one command. Am I missing something or is this not available? Maybe I could write something, but I wanted to check first. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it?

Hello ppl, Is there anyway to control a call mid-way in terms of sending a re-INVITE with say sendonly, etc. to mute one call leg of a bridged call ?? Looked around, so far, doesnt seem to be possible. If it's not, I think it's quite an important feature (re-INVITES mid-session) for a B2BUA. cheers - Ben.

This is weird. If I have 2 members call into meetme using zap PRI channels on the box, they can here each other's keypresses. If I have 2 members call into a separate box using the same PRI's and then forward (dial(iax/...)) them to the previous box into the same meetme, they only hear a minor "squelch" for each other's keypresses. How can I completely mute a